Cited by 4,460Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research

Open access
Fusch, Patricia, Ness, Lawrence·2015·The Qualitative Report

Abstract

Failure to reach data saturation has an impact on the quality of the research conducted and hampers content validity. The aim of a study should include what determines when data saturation is achieved, for a small study will reach saturation more rapidly than a larger study. Data saturation is reached when there is enough information to replicate the study when the ability to obtain additional new information has been attained, and when further coding is no longer feasible. The following article critiques two qualitative studies for data saturation: Wolcott (2004) and Landau and Drori (2008). Failure to reach data saturation has a negative impact on the validity on one’s research. The intended audience is novice student researchers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Amerson, R. (2011). Making a case for the case study method. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(8), 427-428. doi: 10.3928.01484834-20110719-01
  2. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373-395. doi:10.1177/0891241605280449 · DOI
  3. Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40-43. Retrieved from http://www.nursing-standard.co.uk
  4. Bernard, R. H. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137-152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brockman, J. L., Nunez, A. A., & Basu, A. (2010). Effectiveness of a conflict resolution training program in changing graduate students style of managing conflict with their faculty advisors. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 277-293. doi: 10.1007/s10755- 010-9142-z · DOI
  7. Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christiansen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263-1278. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9 · DOI
  8. Bucic, T., Robinson, L., & Ramburuth, P. (2010). Effects of leadership style on team learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(4), 228-248. doi:10.1108/13665621011040680 · DOI
  9. Burmeister, E., & Aitken, L. M. (2012). Sample size: How many is enough? Australian Critical Care, 25, 271-274. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2012.07.002 · DOI
  10. Chenail, R. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255-262. Retrieved from www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/
  11. Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (5 th ed.). New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.
  12. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. doi:10.1177/1558689812437186 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dibley, L. (2011). Analyzing narrative data using McCormack's lenses. Nurse Researcher, 18(3), 13-19. Retrieved from http://nurseresearcher.rcnpublishing.co.uk/news-and- opinion/commentary/analysing-qualitative-data
  14. Dimitroff, R. D., Schmidt, L. A., & Bond, T. D. (2005). Organizational behavior and disaster: A study of conflict at NASA. Project Management Journal, 36(2), 28-38. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org
  15. Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing and diffusion in a tween virtual world. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 47-69. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9057-1 · DOI
  16. Forsey, M. G. (2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558-572. doi:10.1177/1466138110372587 · DOI
  17. Fusch, G. E. (2008). What happens when the ROI model does not fit? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(4), 60-76. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2001.tb00230.x · DOI
  18. Fusch, P. I. (2013). Identifying conflict resolution skills sets for production front line supervisors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3575083)
  19. Gerring, J. (2011). How good is enough? A multidimensional, best-possible standard for research design. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 625-636. doi:10.1177/1065912910361221 · DOI
  20. Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The what and how of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710-737. doi:10.1177/1094428109351319 · DOI
  21. Holloway, I., Brown, L., & Shipway, R. (2010). Meaning not measurement: Using ethnography to bring a deeper understanding to the participant experience of festivals and events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 1(1), 74-85. doi:10.1108/17852951011029315 · DOI
  22. Jackson, J. E. (1990). I am a fieldnote: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity. In R. Sanjek (Ed.), Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology (pp. 3-33). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  23. Jayawardana, A., & O'Donnell, M. (2009). Devolution, job enrichment and workplace performance in Sri Lanka's garment industry. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 19(2), 107-122. Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELRRev/
  24. Kerr, C. (2010). Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquire supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10(3), 269-281. doi:10.1586/erp.10.30 · DOI
  25. Landau, D., & Drori, I. (2008). Narratives as sensemaking accounts: The case of an R & D laboratory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(6), 701-720. doi:10.1108/09534810810915736 · DOI
  26. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  27. Morse, W. C., Lowery, D. R., & Steury, T. (2014). Exploring saturation of themes and spatial locations in qualitative public participation geographic information systems research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(5), 557-571. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.888791 · DOI
  28. Nepomuceno, M., & Porto, J., (2010). Human values and attitudes toward bank services in Brazil. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(3), 168-192. doi:10.1108/02652321011036459 · DOI
  29. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2010). Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 696-726. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-3/onwuegbuzie.pdf
  30. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Slate, J. R., Stark, M., & Sharma, B. (2012). An exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 16-77. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17-1/onwuegbuzie.pdf
  31. O'Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012, May). Unsatisfactory saturation: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal, 1-8. doi:10.1177/1468794112446106 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Packer-Muti, B. (2010). Conducting a focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 1023- 1026. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-4/packer.pdf
  33. Porte, G. (2013). Who needs replication? CALICO Journal, 30, 10-15. doi:10.11139/cj.30.1.10-15 · DOI
  34. Richardson, L., & Adams St. Pierre, E. (2008). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3 rd ed., pp. 473-500). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  35. Roe, B. E., & Just, D. R. (2009). Internal and external validity in economics research: Tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments, and field data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1266-1271. doi:10.1111/j.14678276.2009.01295.x. · DOI
  36. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  37. Stavros, C., & Westberg, K. (2009). Using triangulation and multiple case studies to advance relationship marketing theory. Qualitative Market Research, 12(3), 307-320. doi:10.1108/13522750910963827 · DOI
  38. Walker, J. L. (2012). The use of saturation in qualitative research. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(2), 37-46. Retrieved from http://www.cccn.ca
  39. Wolcott, H. F. (2004). The ethnographic autobiography. Auto/Biography, 12, 93-106. doi:10.1191/0967550704ab004oa · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fusch, P., & Ness, L.
Affiliations
Walden University (US)
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Published
2015-09-08
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
OpenAlex
W1780778418
Cited by
4,460
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 262 · 2025: 510 · 2024: 520 · 2023: 546 · 2022: 561 · 2021: 583 · 2020: 484 · 2019: 414 · 2018: 313 · 2017: 191 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
962.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • ScholarWorks (Walden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
data saturation, qualitative research, content validity, research validity, coding, replication, research design, research students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review