Cited by 32Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Young Students’ Functional Thinking Modes: The Relation Between Recursive Patterning, Covariational Thinking, and Correspondence Relations

Pittalis, Marios, Pitta-Pantazi, Demetra, Christou, Constantinos·2020·Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Abstract

A theoretical model describing young students’ (Grades 1–3) functional-thinking modes was formulated and validated empirically (n = 345), hypothesizing that young students’ functional-thinking modes consist of recursive patterning, covariational thinking, correspondence-particular, and correspondence-general factors. Data analysis suggested that functional-thinking tasks can be categorized on the basis of the proposed model. Analysis traced three categories of students that represent different functional-thinking profiles. Category 1 students exhibited a recursive-thinking profile. Category 2 students utilized a combination of recursive and contextual strategies and exhibited an emergent covariational and correspondence-particular thinking. Category 3 students approached functional-thinking situations flexibly, using a combination of covariational and correspondence strategies. A structural model showed two parallel paths from recursive patterning to correspondence-general through correspondence-particular or covariational.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0164

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Usiskin, 1988, The ideas of algebra, K12: 1988 yearbook, 8
  2. Usiskin, 1988, The ideas of algebra, K12: 1988 yearbook, 8
  3. Wilkie, 2016, Developing students’ functional thinking in algebra through different visualisations of a growing pattern’s structure, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 223, 10.1007/s13394-015-0146-y · DOI
  4. Dubinsky, 1992, The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 85
  5. Doorman, 2013, Educational design research. Part B: Illustrative cases, 425
  6. Smith, 2008, Algebra in the early grades, 133
  7. Tanışlı, 2011, Functional thinking ways in relation to linear function tables of elementary school students, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 206, 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.001 · DOI
  8. Vollrath, 1986, Search strategies as indicators of functional thinking, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 387, 10.1007/BF00311326 · DOI
  9. Teddlie, 2009, Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences
  10. Eisenberg, 1992, The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 153
  11. Mulligan, 2009, Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 33, 10.1007/BF03217544 · DOI
  12. Warren, 2006, Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 208, 10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.006 · DOI
  13. Palinkas, 2015, Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533, 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y · DOI · Paper page
  14. Blanton, 2015, The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46, 39, 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Piaget, 1977, Epistemology and psychology of functions, 10.1007/978-94-010-9321-7 · DOI
  16. Lo, 2001, Testing the number of components in a normal mixture, Biometrika, 88, 767, 10.1093/biomet/88.3.767 · DOI · Paper page
  17. El Mouhayar, 2018, Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 89, 10.1007/s10649-018-9821-8 · DOI
  18. Ferrara, 2016, An early algebra approach to pattern generalisation: Actualising the virtual through words, gestures and toilet paper, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 1, 10.1007/s10649-015-9674-3 · DOI
  19. Creswell, 2012, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research
  20. Stephens, 2017, Compendium for research in mathematics education, 386
  21. Kane, 2016, Validity as the evaluation of the claims based on test scores, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 309
  22. Jurdak, 2014, Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 75, 10.1007/s10649-013-9494-2 · DOI
  23. Dubinsky, 1992, The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 85
  24. Sfard, 1991, On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1, 10.1007/BF00302715 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Carraher, 2007, Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 669
  26. Cooper, 2011, Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives, 187, 10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_12 · DOI
  27. Lynn, 1986, Determination and quantification of content validity, Nursing Research, 35, 382, 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Greeno, 1988, The situated activities of learning and knowing mathematics, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the PME-NA, 481
  29. Papic, 2011, Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 237, 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0237 · DOI
  30. Muthén, 2017, Mplus user’s guide
  31. Siemon, 2011, Teaching mathematics: Foundations to middle years
  32. Smith, 2008, Algebra in the early grades, 133
  33. Doorman, 2013, Educational design research. Part B: Illustrative cases, 425
  34. Confrey, 1995, Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66, 10.2307/749228 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rivera, 2010, Visual templates in pattern generalization activity, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 297, 10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0 · DOI
  36. Blanton, 2011, Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives, 5, 10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Stephens, 2017, A learning progression for elementary students’ functional thinking, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19, 143, 10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Cañadas, 2016, Second graders articulating ideas about linear functional relationships, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 87, 10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.004 · DOI
  39. Miles, 1994, Qualitative data analysis
  40. Stephens, 2017, Compendium for research in mathematics education, 386
  41. Mason, 1996, Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching, 65, 10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_5 · DOI
  42. Greeno, 1988, The situated activities of learning and knowing mathematics, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the PME-NA, 481
  43. Taherdoost, 2016, How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; A step by step guide, International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5, 37
  44. Kieran, 2018, Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds, 79, 10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_4 · DOI
  45. Blanton, 2015, A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’ thinking about generalizing functional relationships, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46, 511, 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Demetriou, 2006, The functional and developmental organization of cognitive developmental sequences, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 209, 10.1348/000709905X43256 · DOI
  47. Radford, 2018, Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds, 3, 10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Brown, 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
  49. Boeije, 2002, A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews, Quality and Quantity, 36, 391, 10.1023/A:1020909529486 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ellis, 2011, Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives, 215, 10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_13 · DOI
  51. Radford, 2011, Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives, 303, 10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_17 · DOI
  52. Thompson, 2017, Compendium for research in mathematics education, 421
  53. Warren, 2005, Introducing functional thinking in Year 2: A case study of early algebra teaching, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6, 150, 10.2304/ciec.2005.6.2.5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • 1 University of Cyprus
Venue
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Published
2020-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
631-674
ISSN
  • 0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2306
OpenAlex
W3118468031
Cited by
32
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
functional thinking, younger schoolchildren, correspondence relations, early algebra, theoretical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review