Cited by 125Evolution and Paleontology StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Global trends and biases in new mammal species discoveries

Open access
Reeder, DeeAnn M., Helgen, Kristofer M., Wilson, Don E.·2007·Occasional papers

Abstract

Reeder, Deeann M., Helgen, Kristofer M., Wilson, Don E. (2007): Global Trends And Biases In New Mammal Species Discoveries. Occasional Papers of the Museum 269: 1-36, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20206413

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.title.156951

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mammals, recent advances in morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa-coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts-have led to widespread taxonomic changes.

    “In mammals, recent advances in the morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa—coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts—have led to widespread taxonomic changes (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Álvarez-Castañeda et al. 2019).”
  • Total recognized species richness has increased by ~25% since MSW3 (2005).

    “Similarly, total recognized species richness has increased by ∼46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (Wilson and Reeder 1993; Cole et al. 1994), ∼25% since MSW3 (Wilson and Reeder 2005; Reeder et al. 2007), and ∼4% since the release of MDD1 (Burgin et al. 2018).”
  • That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method.

    “That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method (Reeder et al. 2007).”
  • These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates.

    “These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Moura and Jetz 2021).”
  • These estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.

    “Both of these estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeder, D. M., Helgen, K. M., & Wilson, D. E.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Venue
Occasional papers
Published
2007
ISSN
0149-175X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W60496746
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.13
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Occasional Papers Museum at Texas Tech University (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
new mammal species, species discovery, taxonomic bias, geographic bias, mammal diversity, species description

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review