Global trends and biases in new mammal species discoveries
Open accessAbstract
Reeder, Deeann M., Helgen, Kristofer M., Wilson, Don E. (2007): Global Trends And Biases In New Mammal Species Discoveries. Occasional Papers of the Museum 269: 1-36, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20206413
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mammals, recent advances in morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa-coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts-have led to widespread taxonomic changes.
“In mammals, recent advances in the morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa—coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts—have led to widespread taxonomic changes (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Álvarez-Castañeda et al. 2019).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Reeder et al. 2007
Total recognized species richness has increased by ~25% since MSW3 (2005).
“Similarly, total recognized species richness has increased by ∼46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (Wilson and Reeder 1993; Cole et al. 1994), ∼25% since MSW3 (Wilson and Reeder 2005; Reeder et al. 2007), and ∼4% since the release of MDD1 (Burgin et al. 2018).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Reeder et al. 2007
That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method.
“That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method (Reeder et al. 2007).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Reeder et al. 2007
These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates.
“These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Moura and Jetz 2021).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Reeder et al. 2007
These estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.
“Both of these estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Reeder et al. 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates
Hoffmann, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., Böhm, M., Brooks, T. M., Butchart, S. H. M., Carpenter, K. E., Chanson, J., Collen, B., Cox, N. A., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194442 · Cited by 1,515 · see citing works
How many species of mammals are there?
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L., & Upham, N. S. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx147 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places
Parsons, D. J., Pelletier, T. A., Wieringa, J. G., Duckett, D. J., & Carstens, B. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2103400119 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reeder, D. M., Helgen, K. M., & Wilson, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Venue
- Occasional papers
- Publisher
- Museum of Texas Tech University
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 0149-175X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W60496746
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Occasional Papers Museum at Texas Tech University (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- new mammal species, species discovery, taxonomic bias, geographic bias, mammal diversity, species description
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review