Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parasocial Romance: A Social Exchange Perspective

Adam, Aimee, Sizemore, Brittany·2013·Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships

Abstract

Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships that people hold with media figures. Although it has been previously demonstrated that people often feel strong friendships with people that they have never met, parasocial romantic attachments have not been well-studied. In the current study, we examined reasons why people form parasocial romances from a social exchange perspective by surveying participants on perceived costs and benefits of both real-life and parasocial romantic relationships (PSROMs), and on the strength of their PSROMs. We found that participants who reported stronger PSROMs also reported greater perceived benefits (relative to costs) of PSROMs, and that these benefits are surprisingly similar to those received from real-life relationships (RLRs). The results suggest that parasocial relationships are formed for similar reasons as real-life relationships, but that there are some unique costs associated with PSROMs. This research helps to explain why people form romantic attachments with media characters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1968.tb01473.x · DOI
  4. 10.1080/08838159709364424 · DOI
  5. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0265407504041374 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/0265407599164005 · DOI
  8. 10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. In K. Törnblom & A. Kazemi (Eds.), Handbook of social resource theory: Theoretical extensions, empirical insights, and social applications (pp. 15-32). New York, NY: Springer.
  11. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/584918 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x · DOI
  15. 10.1080/08838158709386664 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1748048510393658 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00052.x · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00224545.1967.9919772 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF00287608 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/00224499809551915 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00599.x · DOI
  24. 10.1080/15205430903296051 · DOI
  25. Tuchakinsky, 2010, Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple parasocial relationships scale., American Journal of Media Psychology, 73
  26. 10.1080/01463379309369904 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Adam, A., & Sizemore, B.
Venue
Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships
Published
2013-06-28
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
12-25
ISSN
1981-6472
Cited by
32
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review