Cited by 8Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health and Patient Involvement

Patients’ perspectives about the design of a mobile application for psychotic disorders

Open access
Simões de Almeida, Raquel, Sousa, Tiago, Marques, António, Queirós, Cristina·2018·Psychology, Community & Health

Abstract

Aim: Based on the design of applications for psychotic disorders illness self-management, this study aimed to understand patients’ patterns of technology usage, as well as their expectations and requirements concerning the design of an app for rehabilitation and illness management purposes. It also aimed to identify guidelines for mobile application development for this population. Method: After a literature review, a questionnaire was developed, focused on behaviours and opinions about technology usage. It was applied, through a cross-sectional study, to a sample of 102 users of mental health services with psychotic disorders (62% men; with ages between 22 and 66 years old). Results: Nearly 59% of the participants were willing to download an app for illness self-management, and 51% evaluated as essential the self-management of their mental health condition. However, correlation analysis revealed that the more years with mental illness, the less importance is given to an app for this purpose. Conclusion: The use of mobile technologies seems to the have potential to empower individuals with mental health problems, especially younger ones and those in early disease stages. Concerns about privacy/security should be considered, as well as simple screening designs and texts. The results also reveal the importance of user participatory design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/pch.v7i1.192

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Simões de Almeida, Sousa, Marques, & Queirós 25 Psychology, Community & Health 2018, Vol. 7(1), 16-28 doi:10.5964/pch.v7i1.192

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simões de Almeida, R., Sousa, T., Marques, A., & Queirós, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Técnica do Porto (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Venue
Psychology, Community & Health
Published
2018-08-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
16-28
ISSN
2182-438X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886112744
Cited by
8
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychology Community & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
mobile application design, psychosis, illness self-management, patient perspectives, technology use, psychiatric rehabilitation, privacy and security concerns, user requirements, mental health service users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review