Cited by 33Biomedical Ethics and RegulationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchMesenchymal stem cell research

The Alpha Stem Cell Clinic: A Model for Evaluating and Delivering Stem Cell-Based Therapies

Open access
Trounson, Alan, DeWitt, Natalie D., Feigal, Ellen G.·2012·Stem Cells Translational Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Cellular therapies require the careful preparation, expansion, characterization, and delivery of cells in a clinical environment. There are major challenges associated with the delivery of cell therapies and high costs that will limit the companies available to fully evaluate their merit in clinical trials, and will handicap their application at the present financial environment. Cells will be manufactured in good manufacturing practice or near-equivalent facilities with prerequisite safety practices in place, and cell delivery systems will be specialized and require well-trained medical and nursing staff, technicians or nurses trained to handle cells once delivered, patient counselors, as well as statisticians and database managers who will oversee the monitoring of patients in relatively long-term follow-up studies. The model proposed for Alpha Stem Cell Clinics will initially use the capacities and infrastructure that exist in the most advanced tertiary medical clinics for delivery of established bone marrow stem cell therapies. As the research evolves, they will incorporate improved procedures and cell preparations. This model enables commercialization of medical devices, reagents, and other products required for cell therapies. A carefully constructed cell therapy clinical infrastructure with the requisite scientific, technical, and medical expertise and operational efficiencies will have the capabilities to address three fundamental and critical functions: 1) fostering clinical trials; 2) evaluating and establishing safe and effective therapies, and 3) developing and maintaining the delivery of therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration, or other regulatory agencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5966/sctm.2011-0027

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some institutions have merged their common experiences to try to avoid repetition of errors and associated costs.

    “To try and avoid the repetition or errors and the associated costs, some institutions have merged their common experiences (notable examples are California’s Alpha Stem Cell Clinics, supported by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine108,109, the UK Catapult Program in Cell Therapies and the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Trounson A, Baum E, Gibbons D et al. Developing a model for successful transla- tion of stem cell therapies. Cell Stem Cell 2010;6(6):513-516.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trounson, A., DeWitt, N. D., & Feigal, E. G.
Affiliations
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Trounson, Alan
Venue
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Published
2011-12-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
9-14
ISSN
  • 2157-6564 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-6580
OpenAlex
W2138929311
Cited by
33
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stem Cells Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
stem cell therapy, cell therapy delivery, clinical infrastructure, cell manufacturing, good manufacturing practices, clinical trials, regulatory approval
MeSH terms
Animals, Cooperative Behavior, Health Facilities, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Support as Topic, United States, Models, Organizational, Health Care Sector, Biomedical Research, Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Research, Health Facility Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review