Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 949

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015

Open access
Berger, Ann M., Mooney, Kathi, Alvarez-Perez, Amy, Breitbart, William S., Carpenter, Kristen M., Cella, David, Cleeland, Charles, Dotan, Efrat, Eisenberger, Mario A., Escalante, Carmen P., Jacobsen, Paul B., Jankowski, Catherine, LeBlanc, Thomas, Ligibel, Jennifer A., Loggers, Elizabeth Trice, Mandrell, Belinda, Murphy, Barbara A., Palesh, Oxana, Pirl, William F., Plaxe, Steven C., Riba, Michelle B., Rugo, Hope S., Salvador, Carolina, Wagner, Lynne I., Wagner-Johnston, Nina D., Zachariah, Finly J., Bergman, Mary Anne, Smith, Courtney·2015·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue is defined as a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment that is not proportional to recent activity and interferes with usual functioning. It is one of the most common side effects in patients with cancer. Fatigue has been shown to be a consequence of active treatment, but it may also persist into posttreatment periods. Furthermore, difficulties in end-of-life care can be compounded by fatigue. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cancer-Related Fatigue provide guidance on screening for fatigue and recommendations for interventions based on the stage of treatment. Interventions may include education and counseling, general strategies for the management of fatigue, and specific nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. Fatigue is a frequently underreported complication in patients with cancer and, when reported, is responsible for reduced quality of life. Therefore, routine screening to identify fatigue is an important component in improving the quality of life for patients living with cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0122

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 949

Metadata

Authors
Berger, A. M., Mooney, K., Alvarez-Perez, A., Breitbart, W. S., Carpenter, K. M., Cella, D., Cleeland, C., Dotan, E., Eisenberger, M. A., Escalante, C. P., Jacobsen, P. B., Jankowski, C., LeBlanc, T., Ligibel, J. A., Loggers, E. T., Mandrell, B., Murphy, B. A., Palesh, O., Pirl, W. F., Plaxe, S. C., Riba, M. B., Rugo, H. S., Salvador, C., Wagner, L. I., Wagner-Johnston, N. D., Zachariah, F. J., Bergman, M. A., & Smith, C.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2015-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1012-1039
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W2177704039
Cited by
949
References
35
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0122
The paper
Berger, A. M., Mooney, K., Alvarez-Perez, A., Breitbart, W. S., Carpenter, K. M., Cella, D., Cleeland, C., Dotan, E., Eisenberger, M. A., Escalante, C. P., Jacobsen, P. B., Jankowski, C., LeBlanc, T., Ligibel, J. A., Loggers, E. T., Mandrell, B., Murphy, B. A., Palesh, O., Pirl, W. F., . . . Smith, C. (2015). Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.