Cited by 24Quantum Information and CryptographyCryptography and Data SecurityCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

Getting Ready for Post-Quantum Cryptography: Exploring Challenges Associated with Adopting and Using Post-Quantum Cryptographic Algorithms

Open access
Barker, William, Polk, W., Souppaya, Murugiah·2021

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cryptographic technologies are used throughout government and industry to authenticate the source and protect the confidentiality and integrity of information that we communicate and store. The paper describes the impact of quantum computing technology on classical cryptography, particularly on public-key cryptographic systems. This paper also introduces adoption challenges associated with post-quantum cryptography after the standardization process is completed. Planning requirements for migration to post-quantum cryptography are discussed. The paper concludes with NIST’s next steps for helping with the migration to post-quantum cryptography.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.cswp.15

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attack analysis of currently available post-quantum approaches is somewhat limited and their incorporation into existing legacy systems and applications is challenging and expected to take more time.

    “Besides, attack analysis of currently available approaches is also somewhat limited and their incorporation into existing (legacy) systems and applications is challenging and is expected to take more time [190].”

    From Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [190]

    The Post-Quantum Cryptography section says candidate algorithms are unsuitable as drop-in replacements and that implementation may take 5 to 15 or more years after standards are published, supporting the integration and timing claims. The passages do not establish that attack analysis of the available approaches is limited. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, W., Polk, W., & Souppaya, M.
Published
2021-04
OpenAlex
W4285523545
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Funders
Information Technology Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
post-quantum cryptography, quantum computing threats, public-key cryptography, migration planning, NIST standardization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review