The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Open accessAbstract
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 provides guidance to industry, government agencies, and other organizations to manage cybersecurity risks. It offers a taxonomy of high-level cybersecurity outcomes that can be used by any organization — regardless of its size, sector, or maturity — to better understand, assess, prioritize, and communicate its cybersecurity efforts. The CSF does not prescribe how outcomes should be achieved. Rather, it links to resources that provide additional guidance on practices and controls that could be used to achieve those outcomes. This document explains CSF 2.0 and its components and describes some of the many ways that it can be used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Complementary to ZTA, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 released in 2024 [6] and the Cybersecurity Performance Goals [3] provide actionable implementation guidance for organizations initiating trust transformation programs in OT environments.”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, released in 2024, further embeds these principles within a broader enterprise risk governance structure applicable to critical infrastructure sectors including manufacturing.[6]”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The proposed architecture is explicitly designed to align with and extend the IEC 62443 industrial security standard and NIST CSF 2.0, enabling organizations with existing compliance programs to adopt this framework as a coherent extension rather than a competing model.[4], [6], [8]”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The architecture proposed in this study aligns structurally with NIST CSF 2.0, and suggests potential validity and practical applicability as a strategic security model [2].”
From Towards Secure Legacy Manufacturing: A Policy-Driven Zero Trust Architecture Aligned with NIST CSF 2.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–646 of 646
DESIGNING SECURITY SYSTEMS FOR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS
Yashchuk, V. A., Polotai, O., & Balatska, V. (2026) · Scientific papers of Donetsk National Technical University Series Informatics Cybernetics and Computer Science · doi:10.31474/1996-1588-2026-2-43-173-186
Maity, S. S. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26oct511
Federated Digital Capability Under Geopolitical Pressure
Khang, L. G., Uyen, D. M., Tam, N. T. K., & Lan, N. B. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1182-9.ch012
Zenia, M. M. (2024) · American Journal of Scholarly Research and Innovation · doi:10.63125/an0pcq39 · Cited by 2
Digital Transformation in Public and Private Organizations
Islam, M., & Chohan, F. H. (2025) · Jurisocial Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.68740/jjss15
Svitlychnyi, V., Klimushyn, P., & Onishchenko, Y. (2026) · Cybersecurity Education Science Technique · doi:10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1237
Digital Transformation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Systems and Governance
Ogwu, M. C., & Izah, S. C. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9360-5.ch012
A RiskBased Cybersecurity Assessment Framework for Educational Institutions
Vaidya, K. (2026) · International Journal of Versatile Research and Analysis · doi:10.56975/ijvra.v4i10.711726
LEADERSHIP, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2026) · doi:10.65655/ocp.m30.c117
Kimpan, W., Roshna, D., Kesorn, K., Vivancos, N. K., & Namee, K. (2026) · International Conference on Computer and Communications Management (ICCCM) · doi:10.1145/3841323.3841353
Imran, M. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science · doi:10.17762/jidmis.v3.5057
Cybersecurity Services: Definition and Relationship with Risk & Control Frameworks
Rokicki, A. (2026) · Bezpieczeństwo. Teoria i Praktyka · doi:10.31749/2451-0718-btip-2026-2-002
Jaramillo, R. G. F. (2026) · ASCE MAGAZINE · doi:10.70577/asce.v5i4.1132
Gavrylechko, Y. (2026) · Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences · doi:10.31891/2307-5740-2026-358-53
Alrefai, G. (2026) · International Journal of Information & Digital Security · doi:10.54878/tq4szd72
الدردير, ع. ا. (2026) · Shihab Journal of Humanities · doi:10.65405/sjh.2.2.195
Agentic IoT for Urban Renewable Energy
Guan, C., Shi, J., Yu, Y., & Zhou, S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0278-0.ch008
Rathod, B., Baviskar, M. D., & Puri, S. (2026) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.70400
E-Commerce Platform with Integrated Order Tracking and Sales Analytics for Lupah Sug Gadget Hub
Hamidin, N. D., Abdulla, A. W. M., Pandi, S. H., & Pawaki, E.-D. H. (2026) · International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development · doi:10.65339/ijggsd.v1.i1.13
Cyber Security Architecture for AI Enabled Software Defined Vehicles
Sinha, M., Gupta, T. S., Mukherjee, S., & Velayutham, T. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icosics70095.2026.11746555
Explainable AI-Driven Framework for Real-Time Data Leakage Detection in Cloud Environments
Patil, S., Singh, P., & Garg, A. (2026) · International Conference on Information, Implementation, and Innovation in Technology (I2ITCON) · doi:10.1109/i2itcon69735.2026.11747913
HERMES-SOC: An AI Agent as the First Incident Analyst for Small-Scale Security Operations Centers
Yonso, B. A., Yapende-Ko, J.-H., Ndassimba, E., & Ouya, S. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Information, Communication and Networks (ICICN) · doi:10.1109/icicn71760.2026.11745081
Maniago, A. M. (2026) · International Journal of Research Studies in Education · doi:10.5861/ijrse.2026.26441
Data Is Critical Infrastructure
Gardner, A. J. (2026) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/979-8-8688-3192-8_7
Balancing Standards with Local Context
Gardner, A. J. (2026) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/979-8-8688-3192-8_4
Shaikh, Z. M. (2026) · Poornaprajna International Journal of Management Education & Social Science (PIJMESS) · doi:10.64818/pijmess.3107.4626.0078
Shah, B. S. A., & Abid, E. Z. (2026) · Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (ADIPEC) · doi:10.2118/235907-ms
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, DATA, AND DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2026) · doi:10.65655/ocp.m30.c137
Mohammed, A. R. A. (2026) · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals · doi:10.64388/ire1724646
Seixas, N., Pereira, J. D., Campos, J. R., Vieira, M., & da Cunha, P. R. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10933744/v1
Rahman, A. (2026) · International Journal of Engineering Technology Research & Management · doi:10.67809/ijetrm.bko2611r8x4
Kushnir, I. (2026) · Economics Finances Law · doi:10.37634/efp.2026.78.4
A Management Maturity Framework for Thailand’s Satellite-Enabled Critical Services
Delmaire, C., & Malisuwan, S. (2026) · International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) · doi:10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v9i4p117
Sudana, I. M., Handaga, B., & Wantoro, J. (2026) · Jurnal Sistem Informasi · doi:10.21609/jsi.v22i2.1612
A Layered Risk-Based Framework for Protecting Internet Users from Common Cybersecurity ThreatsPreprint
Musa, R. T., & Mahamud, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11589926/v1
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, CRISIS PREPAREDNESS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2026) · doi:10.65655/ocp.m30.c141
Manasa, U., Shreyas, A., & Arun Kumar, B., V (2026) · doi:10.1109/nmitcon70171.2026.11754423
Silent data thieves: Investigating malicious data exfiltration packages in PyPI
Li, Y., Bai, G., Shi, Y., & Huang, K. (2026) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-026-10961-w
Bustos-Gardea, R., Ponce, H., Hernández, J. L., Martínez-Villaseñor, M. D. L., Ochoa, G., Vazquez, R., & Mendez, I. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-44191-1_27
Muhammud, F. S. (2026) · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2026.101000278
Spatial Crime Pattern Visualization and Monitoring System for Jolo, Sulu
Basri, A.-A. A., Piddih, M. R., Asmad, N. J., & Sakiran, J. G. (2026) · International Journal of Global Goals and Sustainable Development · doi:10.65339/ijggsd.v1.i1.29
Metadata
- Authors
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Published
- 2024-02-26
- OpenAlex
- W4385562826
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 160 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 28
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Information Technology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Keywords
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework, cyber risk management, cybersecurity maturity, risk assessment, risk prioritization, cybersecurity controls, cybersecurity practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review