The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guide for conducting risk assessments
Open accessAbstract
This publication has been developed by NIST to further its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), Public Law (P.L.) 107-347.NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems.This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, Section 8b(3), Securing Agency Information Systems, as analyzed in Circular A-130, Appendix IV: Analysis of Key Sections. Supplemental information is provided in Circular A-130, Appendix III, Security of Federal Automated Information Resources.Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority.Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official.This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States.Attribution would, however, be appreciated by NIST.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robotics cyber security: vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2022) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8 · Cited by 320
Guide to Operational Technology (OT) security
Stouffer, K., Pease, M., Tang, C., Zimmerman, T., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Hahn, A., Saravia, S., Sherule, A., & Thompson, M. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-82r3 · Cited by 315
Hogan, M., & Piccarreta, B. (2018) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8200 · Cited by 33
Uche James, U., Idika, C. N., & Anebi Enyejo, L. (2023) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit23564522 · Cited by 29
Deepfake-Enabled Infiltration: The Threat of Synthetic Identities in Corporate Environments
Lozada, J. (2026) · Journal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education · doi:10.53735/cisse.v13i1.226
Metadata
- Authors
- Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative
- Corresponding author
- Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative
- Published
- 2012
- OpenAlex
- W2794421626
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Funders
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Australian Government
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- NIH Office of the Director
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- risk assessment, information security, FISMA, federal information systems, information security standards, risk management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review