Cited by 501Information and Cyber SecurityWeb Application Security VulnerabilitiesInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Guide for conducting risk assessments

Open access
Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative·2012

Abstract

This publication has been developed by NIST to further its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), Public Law (P.L.) 107-347.NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems.This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, Section 8b(3), Securing Agency Information Systems, as analyzed in Circular A-130, Appendix IV: Analysis of Key Sections. Supplemental information is provided in Circular A-130, Appendix III, Security of Federal Automated Information Resources.Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority.Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official.This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States.Attribution would, however, be appreciated by NIST.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.sp.800-30r1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative
Corresponding author
Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative
Published
2012
OpenAlex
W2794421626
Cited by
501
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Funders
  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence
  • Australian Government
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • NIH Office of the Director
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
risk assessment, information security, FISMA, federal information systems, information security standards, risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review