Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsUltrasound in Clinical Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agreement of cardiac index measurements between ultrasonic cardiac output monitor and transthoracic echocardiography in neonates

Open access
Menif, Khaled, Ayari, Ahmed, Louati, Assaad, Ibn Haj Hassine, Shatila, Bouziri, Asma, Borgi, Aida·2024·La Tunisie Médicale

Abstract

Objectives : To evaluate the agreement of cardiac index (CI) calculated by Ultrasonic sonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and transthoracic thoracic echocardiography (TTE) in order to know if we can recommend USCOM in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Design : Prospective observational evaluative study carried out over a period of 3 months Setting: PICU at children's hospital in Tunis Participants: All newborns without tracheostomy or a known congenital heart disease, admitted to the PICU during the study period were enrolled. Interventions: Paired and consecutive measurements of CI were obtained in all patients with both technologies. All measurements by TTE and USCOM were performed by two distinct operators. It is the average of three successive measures of the CI, in the same patient, with each technology, which was considered. Agreement of CI between the 2 techniques was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and percentage error. Measurements and Main Results : Forty-two infants were analyzed with the mean (standard deviation) gestation 36 weeks ( 5 days), age 1 days (1.09) , and weight 2.9 kg (0.87). Respiratory failure was the main cause of admission 75%. At the time of the study, 33 (75.%) patients were ventilated artificially. Bias (mean difference) of the CI between the two methods was 1.2 l/min/m2 and precision (± 2 SD of differences) was 1.08 l/min/m2. The MPE of CI measurement for USCOM vs TTE was 54.9%. Conclusions : The USCOM showed a poor agreement to TTE measures of CI. The two methods cannot be considered interchangeable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.62438/tunismed.v102i9.5095

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Table 1. Patient characteristics
Table 1. Patient characteristicsCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 1. Pearson correlation between heart rate (HR), measured aortic outflow tract diameter (AOT), velocity time integral (VTI) and cardiac index (CI) by USCOM and TTE.
Figure 1. Pearson correlation between heart rate (HR), measured aortic outflow tract diameter (AOT), velocity time integral (VTI) and cardiac index (CI) by USCOM and TTE.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Bland Altman plots for heart rate (HR), aortic outflow tract diameter (AOT), velocity time integral (VTI), and cardiac index (CI)
Figure 2. Bland Altman plots for heart rate (HR), aortic outflow tract diameter (AOT), velocity time integral (VTI), and cardiac index (CI)CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Table 2. USCOM-1A accuracy analyses with transthoracic echocardiogram as reference standard
Table 2. USCOM-1A accuracy analyses with transthoracic echocardiogram as reference standardCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Menif, K., Ayari, A., Louati, A., Ibn Haj Hassine, S., Bouziri, A., & Borgi, A.
Affiliations
Tunis University (TN)
Venue
La Tunisie Médicale
Published
2024-08-27
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
565-570
ISSN
  • 0041-4131 (ISSN-L)
  • 2724-7031
OpenAlex
W4402620206
Cited by
3
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • La Tunisie Médicale (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
cardiac index, ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, transthoracic echocardiography, neonates, measurement agreement, pediatric intensive care, respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic monitoring
MeSH terms
Cardiac Output, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prospective Studies, Tunisia, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agreement of cardiac index measurements between ultrasonic cardiac output monitor and transthoracic echocardiography in neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.62438/tunismed.v102i9.5095
The paper
Menif, K., Ayari, A., Louati, A., Ibn Haj Hassine, S., Bouziri, A., & Borgi, A. (2024). Agreement of cardiac index measurements between ultrasonic cardiac output monitor and transthoracic echocardiography in neonates. La Tunisie Médicale. https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i9.5095

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.