Cited by 224Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Clinicians’ abilities to estimate cardiac index in ventilated children and infants

Open access
Tibby, S. M, Hatherill, M., Marsh, M. J, Murdoch, I. A·1997·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of clinicians involved in the provision of paediatric intensive care to estimate cardiac index in ventilated children, based on physical examination and clinical and bedside laboratory data. METHODS: Clinicians were exposed to all available haemodynamic and laboratory data for each patient, allowed to make a physical examination, and asked to first categorize cardiac index as high, high to normal, low to normal, or low, and then to quantify this further with a numerical estimate. Cardiac index was measured simultaneously by femoral artery thermodilution (coefficient of variation 5.37%). One hundred and twelve estimates were made by 27 clinicians on 36 patients (median age 34.5 months). RESULTS: Measured cardiac index ranged from 1.39 to 6.84 1/min/m2. Overall, there was poor correlation categorically (kappa statistic 0.09, weighted kappa 0.169) and numerically (r = 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.41), although some variation was seen among the various levels of seniority. CONCLUSION: Assuming that objective measurement, and hence manipulation, of haemodynamic variables may improve outcome, these findings support the need for a safe, accurate, and repeatable technique for measurement of cardiac index in children who are critically ill.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.77.6.516

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low cardiac output state is accurately clinically recognized in only 25% of cases in pediatric intensive care units.

    “Low cardiac output state is accurately clinically recognized in only 25% of cases in pediatric intensive care units [10].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    Table 1 (Discussion; page unavailable) shows that clinicians correctly classified 12 of 47 measured low-cardiac-index estimates as low—about 25%. The Patients and methods section specifies that these estimates concerned ventilated, sedated children, so the result does not establish a 25% recognition rate for all pediatric intensive care patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Morrison G. Measurement of car- diac output in children. In: Vincent J-L, ed. 1995 yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Berlin: Springer, 1995:606-14.
  2. Celoria G, Steingrub JS, Vickers-Lahti M, et al. Clinical assessment of hemodynamic values in two surgical intensive care units. Arch Surg 1990;125:1036-9.
  3. Pollack MM, Fields AI, Ruttimann UE. Distribution of car- diopulmonary variables in pediatric survivors of septic shock. Crit Care Med 1985;13:454-9.
  4. Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Tibby SM, McLuckie A. Continu- ous haemodynamic monitoring in children: use of tran- soesophageal Doppler. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:761-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tibby, S. M., Hatherill, M., Marsh, M. J., & Murdoch, I. A.
Affiliations
Guy's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-12-01
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
516-518
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2005219150
Cited by
224
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
cardiac index, pediatric intensive care, mechanically ventilated children, infants, hemodynamic assessment, thermodilution, physical examination
MeSH terms
Body Surface Area, Cardiac Output, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Competence, Humans, Infant, Respiration, Artificial, Thermodilution, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review