Cited by 69Infection Control and VentilationAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Filtration Performance of FDA-Cleared Surgical Masks

Open access
Rengasamy*, Samy, Miller, Adam, Eimer, Benjamin C., Shaffer, Ronald E.·2009·Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection

Abstract

Ashortage of NIOSH-approved respirators is predicted during an influenza pandemic and other infectious disease outbreaks. Healthcare workers may use surgical masks instead of respirators due to non-availability and for economical reasons. This study investigated the filtration performance of surgical masks for a wide size range of submicron particles including the sizes of many viruses. Five models of FDA-cleared surgical masks were tested for room air particle penetrations at constant and cyclic flow conditions. Penetrations of polydisperse NaCl aerosols (75±20 nm, count median diameter), monodisperse NaCl aerosols (20-400 nm range) and particles in the 20-1000 nm range were measured at 30 and 85 liters/min. Filtration performance of surgical masks varied widely for room air particles at constant flow and correlated with the penetration levels measured under cyclic flow conditions. Room air particle penetration levels were comparable to polydisperse and monodisperse aerosol penetrations at 30 and 85 liters/minute. Filtration performance of FDA-cleared surgical masks varied widely for room air particles, and monodisperse and polydisperse aerosols. The results suggest that not all FDA-cleared surgical masks will provide similar levels of protection to wearers against infectious aerosols in the size range of many viruses

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.66828/001c.167200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rengasamy*, S., Miller, A., Eimer, B. C., & Shaffer, R. E.
Affiliations
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
26
Issue
1-2
Pages
54-70
ISSN
0892-6298 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7202395910
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
surgical masks, filtration efficiency, particle penetration, submicron particles, pandemic influenza, respirator shortage, healthcare workers, viral aerosols, NaCl aerosol, respiratory protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review