The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Acute Vaporized Nicotine in Non-Tobacco Users at Rest and during Exercise
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“reported no effect on peak power achieved.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Of the five studies that assessed sub- or maximal endurance, only one demonstrated an ergogenic effect with nicotine [46], whilst the other four demonstrated no change [22, 62] or did not explicitly report time or work completed [18, 58].”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Only five of the performance studies report data on side effects [22, 45–47, 62]; all used nicotine-naïve participants who reported either minor (occasional coughing/sneezing, scratchy/tickly throat) or major (tachycardia, nausea, dizziness, etc.) adverse events that even led to participants suspending trials.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“all previous NRT studies [18, 22, 46, 47, 53] have administered fixed doses.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cryer, P. E., Haymond, M. W., Santiago, J. V., & Shah, S. D. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197609092951101 · Cited by 1,101 · cited 1×
“Nicotine delivered by traditional cigarettes is known to acutely increase arterial pressure and HR via elevated sympathetic activity (9, 11, 18, 22, 23) and impaired cardiac diastolic function in smokers (3) and non-smokers (2).”
BackgroundMechanisms responsible for sympathetic activation by cigarette smoking in humans.
Grassi, G., Seravalle, G., Calhoun, D. A., Bolla, G. B., Giannattasio, C., Marabini, M., Del Bo, A., & Mancia, G. (1994) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.90.1.248 · Cited by 394 · cited 1×
“We recently reported higher resting and orthostatic arterial pressures in young, normotensive non-smokers following acute EC nicotine exposure compared with placebo (10), and suggest that this and our current observations are related to known increases in plasma catecholamines observed with smoking (16).”
Result
Cited by
Cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Skotsimara, G., Antonopoulos, A. S., Oikonomou, E., Siasos, G., Ioakeimidis, N., Tsalamandris, S., Charalambous, G., Galiatsatos, N., Vlachopoulos, C., & Tousoulis, D. (2019) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487319832975 · Cited by 190
Mündel, T. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0764-5 · Cited by 71
Johnston, R., Doma, K., & Crowe, M. (2018) · Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · doi:10.1111/cpf.12443 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogt, D. L., Levi, M. A., Rickards, C. A., Stelly, S. P., & Cooke, W. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Exercise Science
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-615
- ISSN
- 1939-795X
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
