Cited by 25Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Casein Protein Supplementation in Trained Men and Women: Morning versus Evening

Open access
Antonio, Jose·2017·International Journal of Exercise Science

Abstract

International Journal of Exercise Science 10(3): 479-486, 2017. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of casein supplementation (54 grams) in the morning (Casein-MOR) or evening (Casein-EVE) (90 minutes or less prior to sleep) on measures of body composition and exercise performance in trained men and women. Twenty-six healthy men and women who had been training regularly for greater than 12 months completed this 8-week study (mean±SD; Casein-MOR group [n=14, seven male, seven female]: 30.0±8.2 yr; 170.7±9.5 cm; 70.9±13.9 kg. Casein-EVE group [n=12, nine male, three female]: 28.9±9.5 yr; 172.9±7.3 cm; 72.6±10.9 kg). Subjects in each group supplemented with casein protein (54 grams) either in the morning (prior to 12:00pm) or evening (~90 minutes or less prior to sleep). Subjects were advised to not significantly alter their training program as well as to keep a diary of their workouts. Body composition was assessed via the Bod Pod®. In addition, subjects provided dietary self-reports via MyFitnessPal®. Approximately 24 daily dietary self-reports were provided from each subject that self-monitored their diet. The investigators monitored their diet throughout the study. Both the Casein-MOR and Casein-EVE groups consumed significantly more protein (post versus pre; p<0.05); however, there were no between-group differences regarding protein intake. Furthermore, there were no within- or between-group differences for any other measure. In trained subjects who did not significantly alter their training program, the addition of 54 grams of casein protein in the morning or evening had no significant effects on body composition. Furthermore, the additional consumption of protein calories did not result in an increase in fat mass despite the fact that exercise volume did not change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70252/qwha8703

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Antonio et al. study, although not statistically significant, the morning group added 0.4 kg of fat free mass while the evening protein group added 1.2 kg of fat free mass.

    “although not statistically significant, the morning group added 0.4 kg of fat free mass while the evening protein group added 1.2 kg of fat free mass”

    From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise (2017) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Results section (page not provided) reports no statistically significant within- or between-group differences in body composition, supporting that qualifier. The Methods > Protocol section says fat-free mass was measured, but the passages in our copy do not give the claimed gains of 0.4 kg and 1.2 kg; searches for those values and the body-composition table did not recover them. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although not statistically significant, the morning group added 0.4 kg of lean body mass compared to 1.2 kg in the evening group in Antonio et al.

    “although not statistically significant, the morning group added 0.4 kg of lean body mass compared to 1.2 kg in the evening group”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing (2017) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Results section reports no statistically significant body-composition differences within or between the morning and evening groups, and the Methods identify fat-free mass as a measured outcome. The passages in our copy do not report the claimed gains of 0.4 kg and 1.2 kg (searched for both figures and the fat-free-mass results), so those amounts cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In young healthy men and women, casein protein supplementation (54 g) for 8 weeks in the morning or evening resulted in no differences in body composition or performance between groups.

    “The authors reported no differences in body composition or performance between the morning and evening casein supplementation groups.”
  • In Antonio et al., participants supplemented with 54 g of casein protein for eight weeks either in the morning or in the evening showed no differences in body composition or performance between groups.

    “The authors reported no differences in body composition or performance between the morning and evening casein supplementation groups.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonio, J.
Venue
International Journal of Exercise Science
Published
2017
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
479-486
ISSN
1939-795X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617797241
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • International journal of exercise science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
body composition, fat mass, trained athletes, exercise performance, protein intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review