Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concepts of Ethnicity and Culture in Andean Archaeology

Stovel, Emily M.·2013·Latin American Antiquity

Abstract

Although Andean archaeology has long used the term “ethnic” to refer to human groups, new understandings of ethnicity have injected less static understandings of contextualized identity construction into our models of the past. A review of recent work on ethnicity in the field reveals, however, that methodological approaches to these social entities do not always follow suit and rather favor normative synchronie comparisons. This paper explores the origins and trends in the study of ethnic groups and ethnicity in Andean archaeology, arguing that we may be seeing the persistence of the culture concept in the guise of ethnicity. It also examines best practices in the literature in order to make recommendations concerning the adoption of local, contextual, and diachronic methods in conjunction with multiple lines of evidence. These practices are more likely to expose the processes of identity construction by rendering explicit the relationships among culture, ethnicity, and the use of emblemic material culture. It argues, thereby, for the provision of proof of this process rather than its assertion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/1045-6635.24.1.3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existen conocidas limitaciones para la identificación, a escala de la comunidad aldeana, de entidades políticas y procesos identitarios en escenarios multiétnicos andinos donde las configuraciones socioespaciales resultan difíciles de identificar en el registro arqueológico.

    “nos enfrentamos aquí sin duda a las conocidas limitaciones para la identificación, a escala de la comunidad aldeana, de entidades políticas y de procesos identitarios en escenarios multiétnicos andinos donde las configuraciones socioespaciales (frecuentemente interdigitadas) resultan difíciles de identificar en el registro arqueológico”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 152

  1. Lima Tórrez, 2008b, Arqueología de las Tierras Altas, Valles Interandinos y Tierras Bajas de Bolivia: Memorias del 1 Congreso de Arqueología de Bolivia, 265
  2. 10.1016/0278-4165(86)90008-5 · DOI
  3. Nielsen, 2001, Evolución del espacio doméstico en el norte de Lípez (Potosí, Bolivia): ca. 900–1700 DC, Estudios Atacameños, 21, 41
  4. Nystrom, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, 82
  5. Bonfil Batalla, 1992, Identidad y relativismo cultural en América Latina
  6. Martínez, 1991, Etnicidad, economía y simbolismo en los Andes: II Congreso International de Etnohistoria, Coroico, 35
  7. Shennan, 1989, Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, 1
  8. 10.1016/0278-4165(84)90002-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90019-8 · DOI
  10. Silverman, 1988, Cahuachi: Non-Urban Cultural Complexity on the South Coast of Peru, Journal of Field Archaeology, 15, 403, 10.1179/jfa.1988.15.4.403 · DOI
  11. Oakland Rodman, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 115, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.11 · DOI
  12. Gil García, 2002, Acontecimientos y regularidades chullparias: más allá de las tipologías. Reflexiones en torno a la constructión del paisaje chullpario, Revista Española de Antropología Americana, 32, 207
  13. Knudson, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, 194
  14. Williams, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 134, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.12 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/soutjanth.18.1.3629122 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_34 · DOI
  17. Knudson, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas
  18. 10.1002/ajpa.10311 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Avila, 2009, Interactuando desde el estilo: variaciones en la circulatión espacial y temporal del estilo alfarero yavi, Estu-dios Atacameños, 37, 29
  20. Gordones Rojas, 1994, Etnicidad, arqueología y patrimonio: implicaciones de la destructión de patrimonio arqueológico en el estudio de la etnicidad, Revista Venezolana de Sociología y Antropología, 4, 33
  21. 10.1002/ajpa.20480 · DOI
  22. Knudson, 2007, La influencia de Tiwanaku en San Pedro de Atacama: una investigatión utilizando el análisis de isótopos del estroncio, Estudios Atacameños, 33, 7
  23. Stark, 2008, Ethnic Identity in Nahua Mesoamerica: The View from Archaeology, Art History, Ethnohislory and Contemporary Ethnography, 1
  24. 10.1177/1469605305057585 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00042.x · DOI
  26. 10.1525/aa.1996.98.2.02a00100 · DOI
  27. Sillar, 2002, Identidad étnica bajo el dominio inca: una evaluatión arqueológica y etnohistórica de las repercusiones del estado Inka en el grupo étnico canas, Boletín de Arqueología (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú), 6, 205
  28. 10.2307/482267 · DOI
  29. Gentile, 1996, Fronteras, etnias, culturas: América Latina, siglos XVI- XX, 85
  30. 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.846 · DOI
  31. Buikstra, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, 24
  32. Browman, 1984, Social and Economic Organization in the Prehispanic Andes, 117, 10.30861/9780860542476 · DOI
  33. Conrad, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, 55, 10.2307/j.ctt20h6vhb.7 · DOI
  34. Murra, 1972, Visita de la provincia de León de Huánuco en 1562, 427
  35. Sutter, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 183, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.14 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/971740 · DOI
  37. Browman, 1980, Tiwanaku Expansion and Altiplano Economic Patterns, Estudios Arqueológicos, 5, 107
  38. de Vries, 2002, Imaging the Andes: Shifting Margins of a Marginal World, 64
  39. Salomon, 1982, Latin American Research Review, 17, 75
  40. Stanish, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, 83, 10.2307/j.ctt20h6vhb.9 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/CBO9780511616396 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_38 · DOI
  43. Ogburn, 2007, Incas Past and Present: Archaeology and the Indigenous Saraguros of Southern Ecuador, Stanford Journal of Archaeology, 5, 134
  44. Goldstein, 2000, The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective, 182
  45. 10.1007/0-387-28940-2_7 · DOI
  46. Decoster, 2005, Identidad étnica y manipulatión cultural: la indumentaria inca en la época colonial, Estudios Atacameños, 29, 163
  47. Kaulicke, 2002–2004, Identidad y transformatión en el Tawan1tinsuyu y en los Andes coloniales. Perspectivas arqueológicas y etnohistóricas, 6
  48. Vaughn, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 86, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.9 · DOI
  49. Gordones Rojas, 2005, Arqueología de la Cordillera andina de Mérida: Timote, Chibcha y Arawako
  50. Torres-Rouff, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, 212
  51. Nielsen, 2008, Arqueología de las Tierras Altas, Valles Interandinos y Tierras Bajas de Bolivia: Memorias del 1 Congreso de Arqueología de Bolivia, 145
  52. Bawden, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 12, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.5 · DOI
  53. Aldenderfer, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South Central Andes, 10.2307/j.ctt20h6vhb · DOI
  54. Aldenderfer, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, 1, 10.1353/book32736 · DOI
  55. Klaus, 2009, Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas, 126
  56. 10.1007/BF02229256 · DOI
  57. Sackett, 1990, Uses of Style in Archaeology, 32
  58. Topic, 1998, Ethnogenesis in Huamanchucho, Andean Past, 5, 109
  59. 10.1525/california/9780520232457.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1002/ajpa.20965 · DOI
  61. Williams, 2005, Género y etnicidad en la arqueología sudamericana, 163
  62. Bonomo, 2005, Género y etnicidad en la arqueología sudamericana, 139
  63. Durston, 1997, La presencia andina en los valles de Arica, siglos XVI-XVIII: casos de regeneratión colonial de estructuras archipielágicas, Chungará, 29, 249
  64. Buikstra, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 233, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.17 · DOI
  65. 10.1017/S104566350000763X · DOI · Paper page
  66. Huertas Vallejos, 2009, La arqueología y la etnohistoria: un encuentro andino, 55
  67. Abercrombie, 1998, Pathways of Memory and Power: Ethnography and History among an Andean People
  68. 10.2307/279544 · DOI
  69. Llagostera, 1996, Integratión surandina: Cinco siglos después, 17
  70. 10.4324/9780203324615 · DOI
  71. 10.2307/971791 · DOI
  72. 10.2307/971952 · DOI
  73. Avila, 2005, El estilo alfarero yavi y su relatión con la construcción de entidades culturales, Teoría, 14, 85
  74. Torres-Rouff, 2012, Considering Power and the Display of Wealth and Exotica: Northern Chile’s Larache Cemetery
  75. del Río, 2005, Etnicidad, territorialidad y colonialismo en los Andes. Tradición y cambio entre los soras de los siglos XVI y XVII
  76. Lima Tórrez, 2008a, Arqueología de las Tierras Altas, Valles Interandinos y Tierras Bajas de Bolivia: Memorias del I Congreso de Arqueología de Bolivia, 131
  77. Goldstein, 2005, Andean Diaspora: The Tiwanaku Colonies and the Origins of South American Empire
  78. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505 · DOI
  79. Cohen, 1974, Urban Ethnicity, ix
  80. Hodder, 1982, Symbols in Action
  81. Capriles Flores, 2005, ¿Etnicidad en la arqueología boliviana? Una revisión crítica, Textos Antropológicos, 15, 165
  82. Reycraft, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 54, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.7 · DOI
  83. Lozada, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 206, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.15 · DOI
  84. Comaroff, 1992, Ethnography and the Historical Imagination
  85. 10.1215/00141801-2007-064 · DOI
  86. Stanish, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 226, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.16 · DOI
  87. 10.4324/9780203438732 · DOI
  88. Meskell, 1975, Formaciones económicas y políticas del mundo andino, Historia Andina, 3, 313
  89. 10.1525/aa.1995.97.4.02a00110 · DOI
  90. Stanish, 1992, Ancient Andean Political Economy, 10.7560/765269 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1086/338290 · DOI
  92. Bourdieu, 1990, The Logic of Practice, 10.1515/9781503621749 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1086/591318 · DOI
  94. Rowe, 1946, The Andean Civilizations, 183
  95. Meskell, 1984, Andean Societies, Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 119, 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001003 · DOI
  96. Meskell, 1985a, Andean Ecology and Civilization: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Andean Ecological Complementarity, 3
  97. 10.1023/A:1022808529265 · DOI
  98. Silverman, 1993, Cahuachi in the Ancient Nasca World
  99. Meskell, 1985b, Andean Ecology and Civilization: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Andean Ecological Complementarity, 15
  100. Sutter, 2000, Latin American Antiquity, 11, 43
  101. Blom, 2003, Tiwanaku and its Hinterland: Archaeology and Paleoecology of an Andean Civilization, 434
  102. Reycraft, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp · DOI
  103. 10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.432 · DOI
  104. 10.2307/25063066 · DOI
  105. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, 1990, Las macroetnias en el ámbito andino, Allpanchis, 1, 3, 10.36901/allpanchis.v22i35/36.882 · DOI
  106. Capriles Flores, 2003, Arqueología e identidad étnica: el caso de Bolivia, Chungará, 35, 347
  107. Uribe, 2002, El dominio del inka, identidad local y complejidad social y las tierras altas del desierto de Atacama, Norte Grande de Chile (1450–1541 DC), Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 6, 301, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200201.012 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Wise, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, 103, 10.2307/j.ctt20h6vhb.11 · DOI
  109. 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_49 · DOI
  110. 10.1007/s10816-005-8451-5 · DOI
  111. 10.1146/annurev.an.07.100178.002115 · DOI
  112. Covey, 2008, Journal of Archaeological Research, 16, 287
  113. Larson, 1995, Ethnicity, Markets, and Migration in the Andes: At the Crossroads of History and Anthropology, 10.1215/9780822379867 · DOI
  114. 10.1017/CBO9780511558214 · DOI
  115. Barth, 1994, The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, 11
  116. 10.2307/280450 · DOI
  117. Torres-Rouff, 2007, La deformatión craneana en San Pedro de Atacama, Estudios Atacameños, 33, 25
  118. Isbell, 1997, Mummies and Mortuary Monuments: A Postprocessual Prehistory of Central Andean Social Organization, 10.7560/738706 · DOI
  119. Aninat, 1986, Chungará, 17, 67
  120. 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.10.001 · DOI
  121. Blom, 2005b, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 153, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.13 · DOI
  122. Harris, 1997, Saberes y memorias en los Andes. In memoriam Thierry Saignes, 351, 10.4000/books.iheal.827 · DOI
  123. Wobst, 1977, For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, 317
  124. Shimada, 1982, El hombre y su ambiente en los Andes centrales, 137
  125. Páez, 2008, Tipologizando identidades. Reflexiones sobre la constructión de identidades étnicas en la arqueología del NOA, Avá, 13, 1
  126. Lorandi, 2003, Los Andes: Cincuenta años después (1953–2003), 129
  127. Hidalgo Lehuedé, 1998, Actas del IV Congreso International Etnohistoria, 32
  128. Béron, 2005, Género y etnicidad en la arqueologia sudamericana, 119
  129. 10.2307/280642 · DOI
  130. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457 · DOI
  131. Bawden, 1993, Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, 42, 10.2307/j.ctt20h6vhb.6 · DOI
  132. Thomas, 1996, Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology
  133. Barth, 1969, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, 9
  134. Santoro, 2010, Revisita al tercer caso de verticalidad de John Murra en las costas de los Andes centrales y centro sur, Chungará, 42, 325
  135. 10.1080/00438243.1998.9980409 · DOI
  136. Patterson, 1987, Power Relations and State Formation, 117
  137. 10.2307/2802176 · DOI
  138. 10.1525/aa.1989.91.1.02a00010 · DOI
  139. Martínez, 1998, Pueblos del chañar y el algarrobo: los atacamas en el siglo XVII
  140. Cook, 1981, Demographic Collapse, Indian Peru, 1520–1620
  141. Salomon, 1985, Andean Ecology and Civilization: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Andean Ecological Complementarity, 511
  142. 10.1017/S001041750001433X · DOI
  143. 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.417 · DOI
  144. Navarrete, 1990, Cerámica y etnicidad. Una aproximación al estudio de las formas culturales como expresión de lo étnico, Boletín de Antropología Americana, 22, 47
  145. Williams, 2005, Género y etnicidad en la arqueología sudamericana
  146. Berdan, 2008, Ethnic Identity in Nahua Mesoamerica: The View from Archaeology, Art History, Ethnohistory and Contemporary Ethnography
  147. 10.1007/0-306-48652-0_11 · DOI
  148. 10.2307/280643 · DOI
  149. Agüero, 1999, Gaceta Arqueológica Andina, 25, 167
  150. Núñez A., 1995, Movilidad giratoria, armonía social y desarrollo en los Andes meridionales: patrones de tráfico e interacciñn económica
  151. Janusek, 2005, Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, 34, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfwp.6 · DOI
  152. Dietler, 1998, The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, 232

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stovel, E. M.
Venue
Latin American Antiquity
Published
2013-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 1045-6635
  • 2325-5080
Cited by
18
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review