CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Amazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeology and Cultural HeritageLatin American history and culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-Ethnic Settlement and Interregional Exchange in Pimampiro, Ecuador

Bray, Tamara L.·2005·Journal of Field Archaeology
DOI 10.1179/009346905791072369
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reports on recent archaeological investigations at the sites of Shanshipampa and La Mesa in the Pimampiro district of northern Ecuador, a zone rich in archaeological resources about which relatively little is known. Within the context of Andean archaeology, this region is particularly significant insofar as it is described in early historic accounts as an important center of interregional trade. The role of trade in the shaping of ethnic identity and the evolution of complex societies has received relatively little attention in Andean scholarship. The present study expands our understanding of the modes, content, and significance of interregional interaction in the Andes by directing attention to the evidence for long-distance trade, trans-zonal connections, and multi-ethnic settlement in the northern highlands.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/009346905791072369

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Berenguer Jose, 1984, Gaceta Arqueologica Andina, 10, 4
  2. Borja Antonio, 1965, Relaciones Geograficas de Indias. (Originally published 1591.) Biblioteca de Autores Españoles, t. 184, 248
  3. Bray Tamara, 1994, Sarance, 20, 135
  4. Bray Tamara, 1995, “Pimampiro y Puertos de Comercio: Investigaciones Ar-queológicas Recientes en la Sierra Norte del Ecuador,”, 30
  5. Bray Tamara, 1996, Memorias, 5, 33
  6. Bray Tamara, 2001, Arqueologia del Area Intermedia, 3, 11
  7. Bray, Tamara 2003Los Efectos del Imperio Incaico el la Frontera Septentrional: Una Investigacidn Arqueoldgica. Quito: Abya-Yala Press.
  8. Caillavet Chantal, 1983, Caravelle, 41, 5
  9. Caillavet Chantal, 1983, Bul-letin de l'Institut FrauFais des Etudes Andines, 12, 3
  10. Caillavet Chantal, 1989, Ciencia, Vida y Espacio en Iberoamérica, Vol. 3, 109
  11. Cardenas Felipe, 1989, Boletin de Arqueologia, 4, 25
  12. Chapman Ann, 1957, “Port of Trade Enclaves in Aztec and Maya Civilizations,”, 114
  13. Doyon Leon, 1988, “Tumbas de la Nobleza en La Florida,”, 51
  14. Echeverria Jose, 1981, Sarance, 9, 25
  15. Francisco, Alice 1969 “An Archaeological Sequence from Carchi, Ecuador,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  16. Grijalva Carlos, 1921, Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Historia, 2, 33
  17. Helms, Mary 1979Ancient Panama: Chiefi in Search of PowerAustin: University of Texas Press.
  18. Hodder, Ian 1982Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Jijon y Caamano Jacinto, 1920, Boletin de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Históricos Americanos, 4, 1
  20. Knapp Gregory, 1987, Pre-hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region, Part 2. BAR International Series 359, 403
  21. Landizuri Cristóbal, 1990, Quitumbe, 7, 11
  22. Lathrap Donald, 1971, Dumbarton Oaks Conference on Chapin (1968)., 73
  23. Lathrap Donald, 1973, “Gifts of the Cayman: Some Thoughts on the Subsistence Basis of Chavin,”, 91
  24. Lyon Patricia, 1981, Networks of the Past: Regional Interaction in Archaeology, Proceedings of the livelfth Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, 3
  25. Meyers Albert, 1981, “Análisis de la Cerimica de Cochasqui,”, 220
  26. Meyers Albert, 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueolo'gicos. Coleccidn Pendoneros, 143
  27. Morris Craig, 1985, “From principles of ecological complementarity to the or-ganization and administration of Tawantinsuyu,”, 477
  28. Mothes Patricia, 1986, “Pimampiro's Canal: Adaptation and Infrastructure in Northern Ecuador,”
  29. Murra John, 1964, Visita hecha a la Provincia de Chucuito por Garci Diez de San Miguel en el a& 1567. Documentos Regionales para el Etnologia y Etnohistoria Andinas, Tomo 1, 419
  30. Murra John, 1972, Visita de la Provincia de Leon de Hudnuco en 1562. Documentos por la Historia Etnologia de Hudnuco y Ia Selva Central, Vol. 2, 427
  31. Myers Thomas, 1988, no editor stated, Primero Seminario de Investigaciones Sociaks en la Amazonia, 37
  32. Oberem Udo, 1974, “Trade and Trade Goods in the Ecuadorian Montana,”, 346
  33. Oberem Udo, 1978, Actes du XIIIe Congrès In-ternational des Américanistes (Paris, 1976), 4, 51
  34. Oberem Udo, 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Ar-Oeolitgicos. Colección Pendoneros, No. 3, 59
  35. Oberem Udo, 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueolo:gicos. Coleccidn Pendoneros, No. 3, 125
  36. Oberem Udo, 1981, Cochasqui: Estudios Arqueolo'gicos. Coleccidn Pendoneros, No. 3, 39
  37. Pease Franklin, 1982, The Inca and Aztec States, 1400-1800: Anthropology and History, 173
  38. Porras Pedro, 1972, Cuadernos de Historia y Arqueologia, 22, 210
  39. Ramirez Susan, 1982, Senri Ethnological Studies, No. 1, 123
  40. Revere Robert, 1957, “No Man's Coast: Ports of Trade in the Eastern Mediter-ranean,”, 38
  41. Rostworowski de Diez Canseco Maria, 1975, Revista del Muse° Nacional, 38, 250
  42. Salazar Ernesto, 1985, Miscelcinea Antropoldgica Ecuatoriana, 5, 129
  43. Salazar Ernesto, 1992, “El Intercambio de Obsidiana en el Ecuador Precolombi-no: Perspectivas Tairica-Metodológicas,”, 116
  44. Salomon Frank, 1978, Journal of Steward Anthropology, 9, 231
  45. Shimada Izumi, 1982, El Hombre y su Ambiente en los Andes Centrales, Senri Ethnological Studies, No. 10, 137
  46. Shimada Izumi, 1985, “Perception, Procurement, and Management of Resources: Archaeological Perspective,”, 357
  47. Shimada Izumi, 1987, “Horizontal and vertical dimensions of prehistoric states in Northern Peru,”, 130
  48. Shimada Izumi, 1987, Gaceta Arqueoldgica Andina, 4, 15
  49. Shimada, Izumi 1994Pampa Grande and the Moche State. Washington, D.C. Smithsonian Institution Press.
  50. Stein, Gil 1999Rethinking World-Systems. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  51. Uhle Max, 1928, Anales de la Universidad Central (Quito), 264, 183
  52. Uribe Maria Victoria, 1986, Mis-celdnea Antropolo'gica Ecuatoriana, 6, 211
  53. Uribe Maria Victoria, 1986, Anucirio Colombian° de Historia So-cial y de la Cultura, 13, 5
  54. Zeidler James, 1994, Regional Archaeology in Northern Manabi, Ecuador, Vol. 1. University of Pittsburgh Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology, No. 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bray, T. L.
Corresponding author
Bray, Tamara L.
Venue
Journal of Field Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
119-141
ISSN
  • 0093-4690 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-4582
DOI
10.1179/009346905791072369
OpenAlex
W1972763324
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Field Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
  • Office of the Vice President for Research, Wayne State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
Keywords
Pimampiro, La Mesa, interregional exchange, long-distance trade, ethnic identity, Andean archaeology, Northern Highlands, complex societies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review