The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Comparative Approach in Evolutionary Anthropology and Biology
Abstract
Comparison is fundamental to evolutionary anthropology. When scientists study chimpanzee cognition, for example, they compare chimp performance on cognitive tasks to the performance of human children on the same tasks. And when new fossils are found, such as those of the tiny humans of Flores, scientists compare these remains to other fossils and contemporary humans. Comparison provides a way to draw general inferences about the evolution of traits and has long been the cornerstone of efforts to understand biological and cultural diversity. Individual studies of fossilized remains, living species, or human populations are the essential units of analysis in a comparative study; bringing these elements into a broader comparative framework creates a means of testing adaptive hypotheses and generating new ones. With this book, Charles L. Nunn intends to ensure that evolutionary anthropologists and organismal biologists have the tools to realize the potential of comparative research. Nunn provides a wide-ranging investigation of the comparative foundations of evolutionary anthropology in past and present research, including studies of animal behavior, biodiversity, linguistic evolution, allometry, and cross-cultural variation. He also points the way to the future, exploring the new phylogeny-based comparative approaches and offering a how-to manual for scientists who wish to incorporate these new methods into their research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16505 · Cited by 1,244
Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E., & Currie, T. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414495112 · Cited by 440
How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology
MacLean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., Nunn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Brannon, E. M., Call, J., Drea, C. M., Emery, N. J., et al. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8 · Cited by 260
Self-citationEmbodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum
Barton, R. A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0112 · Cited by 210
Infectious Disease and Group Size: More than Just a Numbers Game
Nunn, C. L., Jordán, F., McCabe, C. M., Verdolin, J. L., & Fewell, J. H. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0111 · Cited by 192
Self-citationHunter-Gatherers and the Origins of Religion
Peoples, H. C., Duda, P., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-016-9260-0 · Cited by 186
Phylogenetic Analyses: Comparing Species to Infer Adaptations and Physiological Mechanisms
Rezende, E. L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100079 · Cited by 120
Comparative bioacoustics: a roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa
Odom, K. J., Araya‐Salas, M., Morano, J. L., Ligon, R. A., Leighton, G. M., Taff, C. C., Dalziell, A. H., Billings, A. C., Germain, R. R., Pardo, M., et al. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12695 · Cited by 81
Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis
Miller, I. F., Barton, R. A., & Nunn, C. L. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41250 · Cited by 70
Self-citationThe Molecular Basis of Human Brain Evolution
Enard, W. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.030 · Cited by 55
Clauss, M., Dittmann, M. T., Müller, D. W. H., Zerbe, P., & Codron, D. (2014) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2013.01.002 · Cited by 54
Hrnčíř, V., Duda, P., Šaffa, G., Květina, P., & Zrzavý, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229363 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunn, C. L.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W4299868879
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.