The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Abstract
Humans are a striking anomaly in the natural world. While we are similar to other mammals in many ways, our behavior sets us apart. Our unparalleled ability to adapt has allowed us to occupy virtually every habitat on earth, and our societies are larger, more complex, and more cooperative than any other mammal's. In Not by Genes Alone, Peter J. Richerson and Robert Boyd argue that only a Darwinian theory of cultural evolution can explain these unique characteristics. Not by Genes Alone offers a radical interpretation of human evolution, arguing that our ecological dominance and our singular social systems stem from a psychology uniquely adapted to create complex culture. Richerson and Boyd consider culture to be essential to human adaptation, as much a part of human biology as bipedal locomotion. Drawing on work in the fields of anthropology, political science, sociology, and economics - and building their case with such fascinating examples as kayaks, clever knots, and yams that require twelve men to carry them - Richerson and Boyd convincingly demonstrate that culture and biology are inextricably linked. In abandoning the nature-versus-nurture debate as fundamentally misconceived, Not by Genes Alone is a truly original and groundbreaking theory of the role of culture in evolution and a book to be reckoned with for generations to come.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this way, sociocultural and environmental factors transmit emotion concepts to the new generations as a tool for regulating the body and each other.50,51,[154][155][156]”
From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [156]
In the citing paper
“Culture has been defined as information capable of affecting individuals' behaviours that is acquired from other individuals via social transmission 50 .”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,013 of 1,013
Cognition and biology: perspectives from information theory
Wallace, R. (2013) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0573-1 · Cited by 28
Institutions as Mechanisms of Cultural Evolution: Prospects of the Epidemiological Approach
Heintz, C. (2007) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.244 · Cited by 28
““Institution” appears in the indexes of Sperber (1996) and Richerson and Boyd (2005) , but this adds up to less than ten book-pages on the topic! New Institutional Economics and Evolutionary Economics are research fields in which both institution and cultural evolution are central, but their research is not yet well i…”
BackgroundEvolution, Psychology, and a Conflict Theory of Culture
MacDonald, K. B. (2009) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490900700206 · Cited by 30
Frye, T. (2017) · Cited by 27
Karakus, M., Usak, M., & Ersozlu, A. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020988865 · Cited by 27
Introductory essay: Evolutionary science and the study of religion
Slingerland, E., & Bulbulia, J. (2011) · Religion · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2011.604513 · Cited by 26
Walsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26
Modularity and Recombination in Technological Evolution
Charbonneau, M. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0228-0 · Cited by 25
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Why Was Human Evolution So Rapid?
Tattersall, I. (2017) · Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_1 · Cited by 15
Integrating philosophy with anthropology in an approach to morality
Wong, D. B. (2014) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499614534554 · Cited by 11
Participatory Design as a Tool for Sustainable Regional Development
Ontkóc, M., & Kotradyová, V. (2021) · Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU · doi:10.2478/alfa-2021-0010 · Cited by 3
Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality
Windzio, M. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09531-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W1484547183
- Cited by
- 2,793
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 186 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 195 · 2013: 162 · 2012: 202
- FWCI
- 304.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- cultural evolution, human evolution, gene-culture coevolution, human adaptability, social complexity, cooperation, nature versus nurture, human behavior, cultural psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review