The Economic Cost of Methamphetamine Use in the United States, 2005
Abstract
This first national estimate of the economic cost of methamphetamine (meth) use in the United States suggests that costs reached $23.4 billion in 2005. The analysis, with a lower-bound estimate of $16.2 billion and an upper-bound estimate of $48.3 billion, considers the burden of addiction, premature death, drug treatment, lost productivity, crime and criminal justice, health care, production and environmental hazards, and child endangerment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior economic-burden studies feature many of these domains, and they are viewed as key drivers of SUD social costs, including costs from alcohol use disorders and smoking.
“many of these domains are featured in existing studies of the economic burden of SUDs”
From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Nicosia, Pacula, Kilmer, Lundberg, & Chiesa, 2009
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648 · see citing works
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 · Cited by 4,230 · see citing works
The nature, time course and severity of methamphetamine withdrawal
McGregor, C., Srisurapanont, M., Jittiwutikarn, J., Laobhripatr, S., Wongtan, T., & White, J. M. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01160.x · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McKetin, R., Najman, J. M., Baker, A. L., Lubman, D. I., Dawe, S., Ali, R., Lee, N. K., Mattick, R. P., & Mamun, A. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03933.x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Harms, R., Morsey, B., Boyer, C. W., Fox, H. S., & Sarvetnick, N. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049897 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders
McCollister, K., Yang, X., Sayed, B., French, M. T., Leff, J. A., & Schackman, B. R. (2017) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.008 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
A review of psychological and pharmacological treatment options for methamphetamine dependence
Ciketic, S., Hayatbakhsh, M. R., Doran, C. M., Najman, J. M., & McKetin, R. (2012) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.3109/14659891.2011.592900 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nicosia, N., Pacula, R., Kilmer, B., Lundberg, R., & Chiesa, J.
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 2009
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
