Cited by 43Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders

Open access
McCollister, Kathryn, Yang, Xuan, Sayed, Bisma, French, Michael T., Leff, Jared A., Schackman, Bruce R.·2017·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Aims Estimating the economic consequences of substance use disorders (SUDs) is important for evaluating existing programs and new interventions. Policy makers in particular must weigh program effectiveness with scalability and sustainability considerations in deciding which programs to fund with limited resources. This study provides a comprehensive list of monetary conversion factors for a broad range of consequences, services, and outcomes, which can be used in economic evaluations of SUD interventions (primarily in the United States), including common co-occurring conditions such as HCV and HIV. Methods Economic measures were selected from standardized clinical assessment instruments that are used in randomized clinical trials and other research studies (e.g., quasi-experimental community-based projects) to evaluate the impact of SUD interventions. National datasets were also reviewed for additional SUD-related consequences, services, and outcomes. Monetary conversion factors were identified through a comprehensive literature review of published articles as well as targeted searches of other sources such as government reports. Results Eight service/consequence/outcome domains were identified containing more than sixty monetizable measures of medical and behavioral health services, laboratory services, SUD treatment, social services, productivity outcomes, disability outcomes, criminal activity and criminal justice services, and infectious diseases consequences. Unit-specif…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.008

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

30 of 89 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 10 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Rape or sexual assault costs $270,352 per act.

    “Violent offenses including murder, rape/sexual assault, and aggravated assault generated the highest cost-per-offense ($10.09 million, $270,352, and $120,166 per act, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010 source

      Section 5 (Results; page not provided) gives the paper’s per-offense cost for rape/sexual assault as $240,776, not $270,352. Its third sensitivity analysis gives $244,126, also not the claimed amount. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A day in a residential alcohol or drug treatment program costs $177.

    “A day in a residential alcohol/drug treatment program costs $177.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites French, Popovici, & Tapsell, 2008 source

      Table 1 in Results §3.1 reports a mean cost of $789 per client per week for adult residential treatment, or about $113 per day, not $177. Table 2 in Results §3.2 gives an adult residential weekly cost band of $607–$918, also below $177 per day. The cited paper does not present $177 as the daily residential treatment cost. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A day of methadone or disulfiram treatment costs $24 per patient.

    “A day of methadone or disulfiram treatment costs $24 per patient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites French, Popovici, & Tapsell, 2008 source

      The Results (sections 3.1 and 3.2; page unavailable) report a mean methadone-maintenance cost of $104 per client per week and a proposed weekly cost band of $87–$112, rather than $24 per day. Our copy does not report a cost for disulfiram treatment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Aggravated assault costs $120,166 per act.

    “Violent offenses including murder, rape/sexual assault, and aggravated assault generated the highest cost-per-offense ($10.09 million, $270,352, and $120,166 per act, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010 source

      The Results (section 5; page unavailable) give a total societal cost of $107,020 per aggravated assault, not $120,166. The same section reports $115,365 under an alternative sensitivity analysis, also below the claimed figure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The lifetime medical cost savings from preventing one HIV infection is $389,359.

    “The lifetime medical cost savings from preventing one HIV infection is estimated to be $389,359 (Schackman et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schackman et al., 2015 source

      The Results (Base case; page unavailable) estimate discounted lifetime medical savings of $229,800 from avoiding one HIV infection, not $389,359. Table 2 also gives $400,200 in undiscounted base-case savings; neither figure matches the cited amount. (LLM, conf=0.92)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average cost of screening for alcohol use disorders is $9.22, ranging from $0.69 to $32.

    “Accounting for a few outliers, the average cost of screening is $9.22, ranging from $0.69 to $32.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bray, Zarkin, Hinde, & Mills, 2012 source

      The Results (page not supplied) exclude high-cost outliers and report an average screening cost of $6.85, ranging from $0.51 to $23.99—not $9.22, ranging from $0.69 to $32. The paper uses the median, $3.80, for its summary estimate. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Across all settings, the average cost per episode of brief treatment is $31, ranging from $27 to $33 per session.

    “Across all settings, the average cost per episode of brief treatment (BT) is $31, ranging from $27 to $33 per session.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barbosa, Cowell, Landwehr, Dowd, & Bray, 2016 source

      Section 3.1 (Unit costs, including Table 2) gives an average brief-treatment unit cost of $26.06 across settings, with setting-specific averages of $22.63, $27.61, and $27.94. The Discussion repeats the $26.06 overall figure. These figures do not match the claimed $31 average or $27–$33 range. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average cost of brief intervention is $62, ranging from $4.22 to $126.

    “The average cost of brief intervention is $62, ranging from $4.22 to $126.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bray, Zarkin, Hinde, & Mills, 2012 source

      The Abstract reports a median brief-intervention cost of approximately $48, not an average of $62, and a range of $3.41–$243.01, not $4.22–$126. The Results also report a median of $48.73 across the estimates in Table 2. Our copy provides no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among these domains, criminal activity typically contributes the largest share of the total economic consequences of substance use disorders and is the largest driver of social costs.

    “Of these domains, the relative contribution of criminal activity to the total economic consequences of SUDs is typically the largest driver of social costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bouchery et al., 2011 source

      The paper's Costs of crime section estimates alcohol-attributable crime at $73.3 billion, while Table 2 lists lost productivity at $161.3 billion. Crime therefore was not the largest cost driver in this study. The study also concerns excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., not substance use disorders generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ettner et al., 2006 source

      The ‘Pre-Post Changes in the Individual Sources of Monetary Benefit’ section (Table 2; page unavailable) reports a $5,676 reduction in crime costs over nine months, larger than the $3,352 increase in earnings. That supports crime as the largest contributor to the benefits measured in this California treatment cohort, but not the broader claim that crime is typically the largest driver of the total social costs of substance use disorders. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites McCollister & French, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The additional lifetime cost of an individual infected with Hepatitis C is $80,007, ranging from $58,036 to more than $90,000.

    “The additional lifetime cost of an individual infected with Hepatitis C is $80,007, ranging from $58,036 to more than $90,000 (Razavi et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Razavi et al., 2013 source

      The Results section estimates the lifetime cost for an individual infected in 2011 at $64,490, with a range of $46,780–$73,190 in 2011 dollars—not $80,007 with the cited range. Its estimate with medical inflation is $205,760, so that adjustment does not account for the claimed figures. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior economic-burden studies feature many of these domains, and they are viewed as key drivers of SUD social costs, including costs from alcohol use disorders and smoking.

    “many of these domains are featured in existing studies of the economic burden of SUDs”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Materials and methods · plain
      “and are considered the major drivers of the social costs of SUDs, including alcohol use disorders and smoking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bouchery, Harwood, Sacks, Simon, & Brewer, 2011 source
    • cites Florence et al., 2016 source
    • cites Nicosia, Pacula, Kilmer, Lundberg, & Chiesa, 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Seventeen screening and brief intervention studies with relevant cost information were identified, but their costing methods varied.

    “Seventeen SBI studies were identified with relevant cost information, although the costing methodology varied across these studies (activity-based, non-activity based, and hybrid).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bray, Zarkin, Hinde, & Mills, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Referral to treatment is less resource intensive than brief intervention or brief treatment, with an average cost of $12 and a range of $9.58 to $14.

    “Referral to treatment is less resource intensive than BI or BT, with an average cost of $12 (range $9.58 to $14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barbosa, Cowell, Landwehr, Dowd, & Bray, 2016 source

      Section 3.1 (page unavailable) reports a lower average unit cost for referral to treatment ($7.83) than for brief intervention ($8.56) or brief treatment ($26.06). It does not support the claimed $12 average or $9.58–$14 range; its setting-specific referral costs are $8.03, $9.23, and $12.06. The Discussion also cautions that referrals were rarely observed, limiting strong conclusions about their costs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The crime cost study used national data on criminal offenses, victim losses, productivity losses, and criminal justice system expenditures and has been used in several economic evaluation studies.

    “This study used national data on criminal offenses, victim losses, productivity losses, and criminal justice system expenditures and has been used in several economic evaluation studies to date.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010 source

      The Data and Methods sections describe using national offense and criminal-justice expenditure data, alongside sources for victim and productivity losses; the Discussion (§6.2) notes that the loss data came from several disparate sources. The Conclusion (§7) proposes using the estimates in future economic evaluations, but does not establish that this study had already been used in several such studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The paper reports unit-specific monetary conversion factors and, where possible, upper and lower bounds.

    “Unit-specific monetary conversion factors are reported, along with upper and lower bound estimates, whenever possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The chosen monetary conversion factor for a urinalysis test for alcohol and other drug use is $65, the mean of lab-based costs from $50 to $80.

    “we selected a cost per urinalysis test for alcohol and other drug use of $65, reflecting the mean for lab-based costs ranging from $50 - $80.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The review identified eight broad domains of SUD-related services, consequences, and outcomes, with more than sixty monetizable measures.

    “Eight service/consequence/outcome domains were identified containing more than sixty monetizable measures of medical and behavioral health services, laboratory services, SUD treatment, social services, productivity outcomes, disability outcomes, criminal activity and criminal justice services, and infectious diseases consequences.”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Materials and methods · plain
      “we categorized them into eight broad domains: (1) medical and behavioral health services, (2) laboratory services, (3) substance use disorder treatment, (4) social services, (5) productivity outcomes, (6) disability outcomes, (7) criminal activity and criminal justice services, and (8) infectious diseases consequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The measures include units of service, such as a treatment day or episode, and laboratory products, such as drug and alcohol urinalysis and HIV testing.

    “Measures include units of service, such as a day or episode of treatment, as well as laboratory products, such as urinalysis screening for drugs and alcohol and HIV testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nonviolent crimes such as theft or household burglary may also generate intangible costs to crime victims, but the authors were not able to estimate this component with existing data sources.

    “Nonviolent crimes such as theft or household burglary may also generate intangible costs to crime victims, but we were not able to estimate this component with existing data sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    HIV and HCV measures represent a lifetime perspective on costs, whereas other measures such as a day on probation or a day missed from work represent short-term costs.

    “HIV and HCV measures, for instance, represent a lifetime perspective on costs, whereas other measures (e.g., day on probation, day missed work) represent short-term costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review and targeted searches to find economic data for the conversion factors.

    “A comprehensive literature review and targeted searches of sources were conducted to identify economic data for the MCFs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because of these factors, Hepatitis B may cost more or less than the reported value.

    “Depending on these factors, Hepatitis B may be more or less expensive than the reported value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Those AHA estimates are based on CCR-adjusted inpatient charges per day.

    “These estimates are based on CCR-adjusted hospital charges per inpatient day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Lifetime Hepatitis B treatment costs vary with patient age, comorbidities, and how the patient responds to first-line therapy.

    “For example, the estimated lifetime cost of Hepatitis B treatment will depend on a number of factors such as age of the patient, existing comorbidities, and response to first line treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For converting expenditures across years, the GDP deflator and PCE-Health index are considered preferable to the CPI, as they reflect different inflation rates for health and non-health spending, among other considerations.

    “These tools for normalizing expenditures from different years are considered superior to the consumer price index (CPI), as they take into account different rates of inflation between health and non-health expenditures, among other factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dunn, Grosse, & Zuvekas, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Monetary conversion factors are required to value the economic consequences and costs of services across different measures.

    “Monetary conversion factors (MCFs), sometimes referred to as unit prices or unit costs, are necessary for estimating the economic consequences and costs of services across these disparate measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Short-term estimates reflect an intervention's immediate impact and match outcome data collected during post-intervention follow-up, such as up to five years.

    “The short-term estimates represent the immediate impact of an intervention and align well with outcome data being collected within a post-intervention follow-up assessment (e.g., up to 5 years, although the vast majority of SUD research studies do not extend data collection beyond a 1 or 2 year follow up).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Most SUD research studies do not collect outcome data beyond one or two years.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This emergency department estimate would be much higher for a more serious admission requiring hospitalization and including patient productivity losses.

    “This estimate would be much higher for a more serious emergency department admission resulting in hospitalization and including patient productivity losses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The group counseling cost estimate includes only personnel costs, because the authors lacked information on office lease rates and administrative expenses.

    “We did not have information on office lease rates or administrative expenses for group counseling services, so this estimate represents only personnel costs of conducting group counseling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors state that their list of measures and conversion factors is not exhaustive and is intended to supplement SUD research using standard variables.

    “This implies that the list of measures and MCFs is not exhaustive, but instead is meant to complement SUD-related research studies using a standard set of variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For conversion factor selection, the authors prioritized US nationally representative data, multi-site randomized trials, and micro-costing studies.

    “In our selection of MCFs, we specifically sought data from US nationally representative sources, multi-site randomized controlled trials, or micro-costing studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Across all domains, the search found 17,653 studies, and the authors extracted cost estimates from 34 studies plus online sources.

    “A total of 17,653 studies were identified across all domains and cost estimates were abstracted from 34 studies and online sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The CMS estimates rely on Medicare relative value units, which include physician time, practice expenses, and malpractice insurance.

    “The CMS cost estimates are based on Medicare's relative value units (RVUs), which incorporate physician time, practice expenses, and malpractice insurance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average cost per homeless shelter day is $36, ranging from $14 to $68.

    “The average cost per homeless shelter day is $36, ranging from $14 to $68 (The Lewin Group, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The Lewin Group, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The monetary conversion factors for a day with medical, psychological, or psychiatric problems are derived using DATCAP and ASI measures, drawing on value-of-statistical-life and QALY literature with a VSL of $1 million.

    “These MCFs draw from the literature on the value of a statistical life (VSL) (Viscusi & Aldy, 2003) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (Mehrez & Gafni, 1989) to project the cost per one-unit decrement in a quality-adjusted life-day based on a VSL of $1 million.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites French, Salome, & Carney, 2002 source
    • cites Viscusi & Aldy, 2003 source
    • cites Mehrez & Gafni, 1989 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The lifetime cost per case of a low birthweight infant is $173,001.

    “Cutler and Meara (1999) estimated the lifetime cost per case of a low birthweight infant to be $173,001 (Cutler & Meara, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cutler & Meara, 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average cost per day in foster care, a group home, or as a ward of the state is $23, ranging from $15 in Alaska to more than $29 in Maryland.

    “The average cost per day in foster care, a group home, or as a ward of the state is $23, ranging from $15 per day in Alaska to more than $29 per day in Maryland (DeVooght & Blazey, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DeVooght & Blazey, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other estimates place the value per QALY at approximately $100,000 to $300,000 based on trends in healthcare spending and population health gains.

    “Others have estimated a range of approximately $100,000-$300,000 based on trends in healthcare spending and population health gains (Braithwaite, Meltzer, King, Leslie, & Roberts, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braithwaite, Meltzer, King, Leslie, & Roberts, 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Incarceration costs include operating costs such as salaries, benefits, contracted services, supplies, facilities, healthcare and other inmate services, as well as capital expenditures.

    “Incarceration costs (jail/detention or prisons) include operating costs (salaries, benefits, contracted services, supplies, facilities costs, healthcare and other services for inmates) as well as capital expenditures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pew Center on the State, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kyckelhahn, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Henrichson & Delaney, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Long-term costs have more uncertainty, which can cause considerable variation in total cost estimates.

    “However, long-term costs have more uncertainty and this can cause considerable variation in total cost estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This study provides an updated and standardized source of information on the economic consequences of substance use disorders to facilitate future cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of interventions targeting substance use disorders and other risky behaviors in the US.

    “This study provides an updated and standardized source of information on the economic consequences of SUDs to facilitate future cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of interventions targeting SUDs and other risky behaviors in the US.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Monetizing reductions in rare yet costly events tends to skew the distribution of total social costs and introduces statistical challenges in estimating cost-effectiveness ratios or net economic benefits.

    “Monetizing reductions in these rare yet costly events tend to skew the distribution of total social costs and introduces a number of statistical challenges in estimating cost-effectiveness ratios or net economic benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The variety of domains and measures considered allows analyses to be framed from different perspectives, such as the criminal justice system, insurance payer, or treatment provider.

    “The variety of domains and measures considered here allows for the framing of analyses from different perspectives (e.g., criminal justice system, insurance payer, treatment provider).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Micro-costing is the recommended approach in the Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine and in the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.

    “This is the recommended approach highlighted in the Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (Neumann et al., 2017) as well as in the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) (Husereau et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Neumann et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Husereau et al., 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Health services costs are based on national reimbursement rates or adjusted hospital charges, which may not accurately represent actual costs of service delivery.

    “Health services costs, on the other hand, are based on national reimbursement rates or adjusted hospital charges, which may not accurately represent actual costs of service delivery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The authors believe these monetary conversion factors are the current state of the science for estimating economic consequences.

    “Nonetheless, we have attempted to select high quality information based upon the best available data sources and believe that these MCFs are the “current state of the science” for estimating economic consequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If an act does not result in an arrest or other contact with the criminal justice system, the associated societal costs of the individual transaction are minimal.

    “if an act does not result in an arrest or other contact with the criminal justice system, the associated societal costs of the individual transaction is minimal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    This review and cost-compilation study provides a current, comprehensive, and standardized source of monetary conversion factors for estimating the economic consequences of substance use disorders in the US.

    “This review and cost-compilation study offers an important contribution to the economic evaluation literature by providing a current, comprehensive, and standardized source of MCFs for estimating the economic consequences of substance use disorders in the US.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The monetary conversion factors can be used outside substance use disorder treatment evaluations to estimate the economic consequences of crime prevention programs, school-based delinquency interventions, and prevention programs targeting risky behaviors.

    “The estimates can also be used outside of SUD treatment evaluations to estimate the economic consequences of crime prevention programs, school-based delinquency interventions, and prevention programs targeting risky behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
44 of 44
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For estimating per-client group counseling cost, the authors assumed an average of 10 participants per group therapy session.

    “we made an assumption about the average number of clients attending a group therapy session. The website psychologistanywhereanytime.com reports that the average group therapy session has 5-10 participants. We selected an average of 10 participants per group session”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most SUD research studies do not collect outcome data beyond one or two years.

    “although the vast majority of SUD research studies do not extend data collection beyond a 1 or 2 year follow up”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most economic evaluations of substance use disorder interventions will include at least some of the outcomes covered by the monetary conversion factors.

    “Most economic evaluations of SUD interventions will have at least a subset of these outcomes.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • School-day value uses a different inflation index from the stated method

    Minor

    The methods say all non-health estimates were converted to 2016 dollars with the GDP deflator. The calculation of the school-day value instead says it used the CPI.

  • School-day value uses a different inflation index than the stated method

    Minor

    The methods say all estimates were converted to 2016 dollars using either the GDP deflator or the PCE-Health index. The school-day estimate is instead described as adjusted using the CPI.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCollister, K., Yang, X., Sayed, B., French, M. T., Leff, J. A., & Schackman, B. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • McCollister, Kathryn
  • Yang, Xuan
  • Sayed, Bisma
  • French, Michael T.
  • Leff, Jared A.
  • Schackman, Bruce R.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
81
Pages
25-34
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2735354337
Cited by
43
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA040500, R01DA035808)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
substance use disorders, economic evaluation, cost estimation, health care costs, productivity loss, disability costs, criminal justice costs, HIV, hepatitis C, co-occurring disorders, social services, treatment costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Communicable Diseases, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review