Joint venture governance
Open accessAbstract
Joint venture (JV) success greatly depends on governance mechanisms such as contracts, equity shares and boards of directors. Unlike some other types of alliances, JVs are always governed by detailed legal contracts that describe how the relationships are to be structured and governed. Using a unique database of 626 JV contracts, this dissertation expands our knowledge on JV governance through three interrelated empirical studies.The first study examines JV contracts and the institutional determinants of their complexity by drawing on institutional theory and transaction cost economics (TCE). Results indicate that contractual complexity is greater for international JVs than for domestic JVs. In addition, contractual complexity is also related to institutional variables based on the country in which the contract is enforced. For example, complexity is higher in countries with a civil law system in comparison to common law, in countries with inefficient court systems, and in countries where corruption levels are low.The second study addresses another crucial governance mechanism in JVs: The board of directors. A board is often used to help partner firms monitor and manage the JV, align the interests of the partners and address possible conflicts (Contractor & Reuer, 2014; Cuypers, Ertug, Reuer, & Bensaou, 2017). However, little is known about what determines whether a JV board is actually established. By analyzing the contracts and by drawing on TCE and agency theories, results show that JV boards serve as complements to JV contracts rather than substitutes. Boards are also more likely to be created for JVs which have multiple safeguards, for JVs that perform research and development, and for international JVs and JVs hosted in countries with lower quality of intellectual property rights protection. The last study explores the relationship between equity shareholding and board participation, two important JV governance mechanisms that are presumed to be correlated. Results confirm that this correlation is strong (0.58) but not extremely high. Drawing on TCE and resource dependency theories, this chapter examines why certain joint ventures present a deviation between the percentages of board representation share versus the equity shareholding of each partner. Results indicate that board representation in international JVs tends to have a greater deviation, while JVs with deadlock clauses, large boards, and JVs hosted in stable countries deviate less.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IJVs are today covered by as detailed and long an agreement as contractual or non-equity alliances, both based on the letter of the agreement and the relationship, although the relationship is on average stronger and deeper in IJVs than in contractual alliances.
“Many IB scholars still seem to be not fully aware that IJVs are today covered by as detailed and long an agreement as in contractual or “non-equity” alliances, both of which are based on the letter of the agreement, as well as the relationship, although the relationship is, on average, stronger and deeper in IJVs than in contractual alliances (Velez-Calle, 2018; Contractor & Reuer, 2019).”
From The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade (2022) · cites this paper as Velez-Calle, 2018
Cites
Choice Between Non-Equity Entry Modes: An Organizational Capability Perspective
Krishna Erramilli, M., Agarwal, S., & Dev, C. S. (2002) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491014 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Nyaw, M. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.626 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade
Contractor, F. J. (2022) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y · Cited by 225 · see citing works
- Authors
- Velez-Calle, A.
- Venue
- No Publisher Supplied
- Publisher
- No Publisher Supplied
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2938834371
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- joint ventures, international joint ventures, board of directors, board representation, intellectual property protection, corruption, civil law vs common law, resource dependence theory, agency theory, transaction cost economics, institutional determinants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review