Cited by 17Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chinese Esoteric Buddhism

Goble, Geoffrey C.·2019·Columbia University Press eBooks

Abstract

Chinese Esoteric Buddhism is generally held to have been established as a distinct Buddhist school in eighth-century China. Geoffrey C. Goble provides an innovative account of the tradition’s emergence that sheds new light on the structures and traditions that shaped its institutionalization, with a focus on Amoghavajra (704–774).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7312/gobl19408

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goble, G. C.
Corresponding author
Goble, Geoffrey C.
Venue
Columbia University Press eBooks
Published
2019-10-10
OpenAlex
W3209939075
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.43
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Amoghavajra, esoteric Buddhism, Buddhist sects, Chinese Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review