Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of Patients for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Revascularization Early after Myocardial Infarction: Is There Evidence for a Gender Bias?

Krumholz, Harlan M., Douglas, Pamela S., Lauer, Michael S., Pasternak, Richard C.·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a gender bias exists in the selection of patients for diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures early after myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A community-based tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 2473 consecutive patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and a peak creatine kinase MB fraction of at least 4%. MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of men and women regarding the frequency with which they underwent various cardiac procedures. RESULTS: Women had coronary angiography during hospitalization for myocardial infarction much less frequently than men (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% Cl, 0.46 to 0.65), but the age-adjusted rates were similar in women and men (odds ratio, 0.91; Cl, 0.75 to 1.12). An abnormal ejection fraction (less than 50%) was equally frequent in women and men who underwent left ventriculography (odds ratio, 0.85; Cl, 0.56 to 1.30). Among patients who had coronary angiography, women had a significantly lower rate of severe coronary artery disease, defined as either a left main stenosis of more than 50%, three-vessel disease, or two-vessel disease with a proximal left anterior descending stenosis of more than 70% (odds ratio, 0.67; Cl, 0.48 to 0.93). When adjustments were made for age, women had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as often as men (odds ratio, 1.16; Cl, 0.83 to 1.62) but had coronary artery bypass graft surgery significantly less frequently (odds ratio, 0.58; Cl, 0.37 to 0.91). When adjustments were made for age and the severity of coronary artery disease, the difference in rates was of borderline significance (odds ratio, 0.65; Cl, 0.41 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of a difference in the rate of coronary angiography early after myocardial infarction between women and men was found after age adjustment. Among patients who have cardiac catheterization early after myocardial infarction, women and men are equally likely to have angioplasty, but women are less likely than men to have coronary artery bypass surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-785

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Krumholz, H. M., Douglas, P. S., Lauer, M. S., & Pasternak, R. C.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-05-15
Volume
116
Issue
10
Pages
785-790
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1982522370
Cited by
290
References
21
FWCI
19.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of Patients for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Revascularization Early after Myocardial Infarction: Is There Evidence for a Gender Bias? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-785
The paper
Krumholz, H. M., Douglas, P. S., Lauer, M. S., & Pasternak, R. C. (1992). Selection of Patients for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Revascularization Early after Myocardial Infarction: Is There Evidence for a Gender Bias? Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.