The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Mortality of Women in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Evidence for Referral Bias
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences in referral reasons explain the higher operative mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A tertiary care, private teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who had isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1982 and 1987 (total, 2297; 79% male and 21% female). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The inhospital mortality rate was significantly higher for women than for men (4.6% compared with 2.6%; P = 0.036; 95% CI for difference in mortality, 0% to 4.0%). Women were older than men (mean, 68.2 and 64.0 years, respectively; P less than 0.001), and a higher percentage of women were referred with unstable angina (P = 0.007), postmyocardial infarction angina (P = 0.029), congestive heart failure (P less than 0.001), and New York Heart Association class IV symptoms (66% compared with 45%, P less than 0.001). More men were referred with a history of an abnormal exercise test (P less than 0.001), and patients referred because of a positive exercise test had a lower mortality (P less than 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, adjustment for the higher preoperative functional class of women and for age accounted for all of the difference in mortality between men and women (odds ratio, 1.04; CI, 0.60 to 1.79; P = 0.89). After correction for functional class alone, there continued to be no significant difference in mortality between men and women (P = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in functional class and age account for the higher operative mortality of women in coronary bypass surgery. Women are referred for coronary bypass surgery later in the course of their disease than men, and later referral may increase their changes of operative death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Diamond, G. A., & Forrester, J. S. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197906143002402 · Cited by 2,664
Cited by
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease
Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107253250401 · Cited by 1,188
Shaw, L. J., Bairey Merz, C. N., Azziz, R., Stanczyk, F. Z., Sopko, G., Braunstein, G. D., Kelsey, S. F., Kip, K. E., Cooper-DeHoff, R. M., Johnson, B. D., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0425 · Cited by 427
RetractedThe Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women
Douglas, P. S., & Ginsburg, G. S. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605163342007 · Cited by 369
Effect of Coronary Artery Diameter in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery
O’Connor, N. J., Morton, J. R., Birkmeyer, J. D., Olmstead, E. M., & O’Connor, G. T. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.93.4.652 · Cited by 263
Gender bias in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease
Beery, T. A. (1995) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/s0147-9563(95)80020-4 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S. S., Nessim, S., Gray, R., Czer, L. S., Chaux, A., & Matloff, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1990-04-15
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 561-567
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1974692629
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Mortality of Women in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Evidence for Referral Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-561
- The paper
- Khan, S. S., Nessim, S., Gray, R., Czer, L. S., Chaux, A., & Matloff, J. (1990). Increased Mortality of Women in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Evidence for Referral Bias. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.