The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Referral Patterns for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment: Gender Bias or Good Clinical Judgment?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a gender bias exists in referral for coronary bypass graft surgery among patients with catheterization-documented coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Historical cohort study (1969 to 1984). SETTING: A referral medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 5795 patients with catheterization-documented coronary artery disease. MEASUREMENTS: Surgical referral patterns of men and women grouped by risk for cardiac death and by treatment effectiveness. Time trends were evaluated for three periods: 1969 to 1974, 1975 to 1979, and 1980 to 1984. RESULTS: Overall, when no adjustment was made for baseline risk for cardiac death, no statistical difference was found between men and women regarding referral for surgery (46% compared with 44%, respectively). When an adjustment was made for such risk, the male-to-female odds ratio for surgical referral was 1.28 (95% Cl, 1.05 to 1.58) among patients with a low risk for cardiac death. This effect was most evident in the 1980 to 1984 period (odds ratio, 1.73; Cl, 1.29 to 2.31). In the high-risk group, the odds ratio was 0.84 (Cl, 0.68 to 1.04), with little change occurring during the study. Men were more likely to be referred for surgery when surgery offered the least survival benefit relative to medical therapy (odds ratio, 1.29; Cl, 1.08 to 1.54). This effect was most pronounced in the 1980 to 1984 period (odds ratio, 1.63; Cl, 1.27 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Women are less likely than men to be referred for coronary bypass graft surgery among patients with a low risk for cardiac death, in whom surgery offers little or no survival benefit over medical treatment. Women are at least as likely as men to be referred for bypass surgery among more symptomatic and more severely diseased patients, in whom surgery offers the greatest survival benefits. These trends were most prominent in the recent years of the study. Based on surgical survival benefits, these referral patterns may represent more appropriate treatment referral for women than men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease
Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107253250401 · Cited by 1,188
Cited by
The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization
Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., Dubé, R., Taleghani, C. K., Burke, J. E., Williams, S., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902253400806 · Cited by 1,934
The Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women
Douglas, P. S., & Ginsburg, G. S. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605163342007 · Cited by 369
Hochman, J. S., McCabe, C. H., Stone, P. H., Becker, R. C., Cannon, C. P., DeFeo-Fraulini, T., Thompson, B., Steingart, R., Knatterud, G., & Braunwald, E. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00107-1 · Cited by 268
Gender bias in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease
Beery, T. A. (1995) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/s0147-9563(95)80020-4 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Bickell, N. A., Pieper, K. S., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Glower, D. D., Pryor, D. B., & Califf, R. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1992-05-15
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 791-797
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2037616009
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Referral Patterns for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment: Gender Bias or Good Clinical Judgment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-791
- The paper
- Bickell, N. A., Pieper, K. S., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Glower, D. D., Pryor, D. B., & Califf, R. M. (1992). Referral Patterns for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment: Gender Bias or Good Clinical Judgment? Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.