The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prudent Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the appropriateness of red blood cell transfusion and current physician practice, with emphasis on the physiologic and symptomatic implications of elective transfusion in the treatment of anemia. DATA SOURCES: Studies on the therapeutic use of red blood cell transfusion were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966 to the present) and through a manual review of bibliographies of identified articles. In addition, evidence was solicited from selected experts in the field and recent consensus panels that have developed transfusion guidelines. DATA SYNTHESIS: No controlled trials of blood transfusion were identified, but data were available on four issues relevant to transfusion practice: current physician practice and evidence for excessive use of red blood cell transfusion; physiologic adaptation to anemia; human tolerance of low hemoglobin levels; and strategies for reducing homologous transfusion requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent decline in red blood cell use because of concerns about infection, current transfusion practice remains variable because physicians have disparate views about its appropriateness. The remarkable human tolerance of anemia suggests that clinicians can accept hemoglobin levels above 70 g/L (7 g/dL) in most patients with self-limited anemia. In patients with impaired cardiovascular status or with anemias that will not resolve spontaneously, however, the data are insufficient to determine minimum acceptable hemoglobin levels, and therapy must be guided by the clinical situation. Several therapeutic strategies and pharmacologic interventions are available in the perioperative and non-operative settings to further reduce red blood cell use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pincus, T., Olsen, N. J., Russell, I. J., Wolfe, F., Robert Harris, E., Schnitzer, T. J., Boccagno, J. A., & Krantz, S. B. (1990) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(90)90294-n · Cited by 226
Cited by
Anemia as a risk factor and therapeutic target in heart failure
Felker, G. M., Adams, K. F., Gattis, W. A., & O'Connor, C. M. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.070 · Cited by 255
Economic impact of inappropriate blood transfusions in coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Goodnough, L. T., Soegiarso, R. W., Birkmeyer, J. D., & Welch, H. G. (1993) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(93)90086-5 · Cited by 129
Self-citationRubin, G. L., Schofield, W. N., Dean, M. G., & Shakeshaft, A. P. (2001) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143617.x · Cited by 34
Ducrocq, G., Puymirat, E., Steg, P. G., Henry, P., Martelet, M., Karam, C., Schiele, F., Simon, T., & Danchin, N. (2015) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.004 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, H. G., Meehan, K. R., & Goodnough, L. T.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1992-03-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 393-402
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2151621769
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.