Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke

Di Tullio, Marco, Sacco, Ralph L., Gopal, Aasha, Mohr, J. P., Homma, Shunichi·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke of undetermined origin (cryptogenic) and in patients with stroke of determined origin to assess the possible role of patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with nested case-control analysis. PATIENTS: A total of 146 patients (73 men, 73 women) with acute ischemic stroke referred to the echocardiography laboratory for evaluation. SETTING: Neurovascular Unit and Echocardiography Laboratory, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were considered to have strokes of determined origin or cryptogenic strokes according to National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Data Bank criteria. The presence of patent foramen ovale was assessed by contrast echocardiography, performed blinded for type of stroke. The association between patent foramen ovale and type of stroke was tested after correcting for patients' demographic variables and stroke risk factors. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of patent foramen ovale was 26 of 146 patients (18%; 95% Cl, 11.4% to 24.6%). Patients with cryptogenic stroke (31%) had a significantly higher prevalence of patent foramen ovale than did patients with an identifiable cause of stroke (69%) in both the younger (less than 55 years; 48% compared with 4%; P less than 0.001) and the older (greater than or equal to 55 years; 38% compared with 8%; P less than 0.001) age groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the presence of a patent foramen ovale as strongly associated with the diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke (odds ratio, 7.2; Cl, 2.4 to 21.7), irrespective of patient age and other stroke risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cryptogenic stroke have a higher prevalence of patent foramen ovale than patients with stroke of determined cause in all age groups, even after correcting for the presence of recognized stroke risk factors. This identifies patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. Regardless of patient age, contrast echocardiography should be considered when the cause of stroke is unknown.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-461

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R. L., Gopal, A., Mohr, J. P., & Homma, S.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-09-15
Volume
117
Issue
6
Pages
461-465
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1493823773
Cited by
600
References
11
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-461
The paper
Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R. L., Gopal, A., Mohr, J. P., & Homma, S. (1992). Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.