Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Weight Patterns and Risk for Cholecystectomy in Women

Syngal, Sapna, Coakley, Eugenie H., Willett, Walter C., Byers, Tim, Williamson, David F., Colditz, Graham A.·1999·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Obesity and rapid weight loss in obese persons are known risk factors for gallstones. However, the effect of intentional, long-term, moderate weight changes on the risk for gallstones is unclear. Objective To study long-term weight patterns in a cohort of women and to examine the relation between weight pattern and risk for cholecystectomy. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting 11 U.S. states. Participants 47,153 female registered nurses who did not undergo cholecystectomy before 1988. Measurements Cholecystectomy between 1988 and 1994 (ascertained by patient self-report). Results During the exposure period (1972 to 1988), there was evidence of substantial variation in weight due to intentional weight loss during adulthood. Among cohort patients, 54.9% reported weight cycling with at least one episode of intentional weight loss associated with regain. Of the total cohort, 20.1% were light cyclers (5 to 9 lb of weight loss and gain), 18.8% were moderate cyclers (10 to 19 lb of weight loss and gain), and 16.0% were severe cyclers (> or = 20 lb of weight loss and gain). Net weight gain without cycling occurred in 29.3% of women; net weight loss without cycling was the least common pattern (4.6%). Only 11.1% of the cohort maintained weight within 5 lb over the 16-year period. In the study, 1751 women had undergone cholecystectomy between 1988 and 1994. Compared with weight maintainers, the relative risk for cholecystectomy (adjusted for body mass index, age, alcohol…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1001/jama.1994.03520030047027 · DOI
  2. French SA, 1995, Int J Obes Rel Metab Disord, 19, 22
  3. 10.1056/NEJM197811302992205 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0021-9681(66)90132-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/gut.30.4.528 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF01296440 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/hep.1840070520 · DOI
  8. 10.1136/jech.36.4.274 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115574 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115573 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/ajcn/55.3.652 · DOI
  12. 10.1136/bmj.288.6424.1113 · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJM198812153192403 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390080036009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/BF01300390 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0002-9610(85)80055-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Deitel M, 1987, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 164, 549
  18. Knecht BH, 1978, Am Surg, 44, 496
  19. 10.1136/bmj.286.6367.763 · DOI
  20. Shiffman ML, 1991, Am J Gastroenterol, 86, 1000
  21. 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90427-3 · DOI
  22. 10.7326/0003-4819-85-1-97 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJM198908313210902 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2105/AJPH.81.7.880 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116281 · DOI
  26. Colditz GA, 1990, Current Problems in Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Fertility, 13, 129
  27. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/sim.4780070122 · DOI
  29. 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00010 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90848-S · DOI
  31. 10.1007/BF01536623 · DOI
  32. 10.7326/0003-4819-122-12-199506150-00002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Syngal, S., Coakley, E. H., Willett, W. C., Byers, T., Williamson, D. F., & Colditz, G. A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1999-03-16
Volume
130
Issue
6
Pages
471-477
ISSN
  • 0003-4819
  • 1539-3704
Cited by
79
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review