Cited by 558Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsSmoking Behavior and CessationHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause.

WILLETT, WALTER, STAMPFER, MEIR J., BAIN, CHRISTOPHER, LIPNICK, ROBERT, SPEIZER, FRANK E., ROSNER, BERNARD, CRAMER, DANIEL, HENNEKENS, CHARLES H.·1983·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

To examine the interrelationships of cigarette smoking, relative weight, and the occurrence of natural menopause, the authors prospectively evaluated the experience of 66,663 female US registered nurses who were premenopausal in 1976. Over a two-year period, 5004 women became post-menopausal. Current smokers were more likely than past or never smokers to develop menopause, although the effects of smoking diminished with age. The rate ratios of menopause for current smokers vs. never smokers (with 95% confidence limits) for women aged 30-39, 40-44, 45-49, and 50-55 years were 1.90 (1.10-3.28), 2.16 (1.73-2.69), 1.53 (1.41-1.67), and 1.20 (1.12-1.28). These rate ratios were not appreciably affected by adjustment for relative weight. Median ages at menopause were 52.4 for never smokers and 51.9, 51.0, 50.7, and 50.4 years for women who currently smoked 1-14, 15-24, 25-34, and 35 or more cigarettes per day. A crude linear relationship between relative weight and occurrence of menopause was observed. Comparing the leanest and heaviest quintiles, rate ratios for menopause among women aged 30-39, 40-44, 45-49, and 50-55 years were 1.42 (0.74-2.75), 1.26 (0.95-1.69), 1.25 (1.13-1.41) and 1.08 (0.99-1.19). The effect of relative weight was in part explained by the tendency of current smokers to weigh less than nonsmokers. After adjustment for current cigarette consumption a weak linear relationship between relative weight and menopause remained among women who smoked, although no such association was seen among nonsmokers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113598

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILLETT, W., STAMPFER, M. J., BAIN, C., LIPNICK, R., SPEIZER, F. E., ROSNER, B., CRAMER, D., & HENNEKENS, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
WILLETT, WALTER
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1983-06
Volume
117
Issue
6
Pages
651-658
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1941832839
Cited by
558
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
cigarette smoking, menopause, relative weight, body weight, age at menopause, smoking cessation, women's health, registered nurses
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Body Weight, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review