Cited by 202Ethics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit.

Mueller, Paul S., Montori, Victor M., Bassler, Dirk, Koenig, Barbara A., Guyatt, Gordon H.·2007·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Stopping randomized trials early because of an apparent benefit is becoming more common. To protect and promote the interests of trial participants, investigators may feel obligated to stop a trial early because of the apparent benefit of a study treatment (compared with placebo or other treatment). There are, however, serious ethical problems with doing so. Truncated trials systematically overestimate treatment effects; in cases where the number of accrued outcome events is small, the overestimation may be very large. Generating seriously inflated estimates of treatment effect violates the ethical research requirement of scientific validity. Subsequent use of inflated estimates to inform clinical decision making and practice guidelines violates the ethical requirements of social value and a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Researchers should ensure that a large number of outcome events accrues before stopping a trial and then continue recruitment to assess whether positive trends continue. This can balance the need to protect research participants with the ethical requirements of scientific validity, social value, and a favorable risk-benefit ratio.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00009

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brion LP, 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003665

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–202 of 202

Metadata

Authors
Mueller, P. S., Montori, V. M., Bassler, D., Koenig, B. A., & Guyatt, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • From Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany; and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
146
Issue
12
Pages
878-881
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2148390494
Cited by
202
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
early trial termination, randomized controlled trials, trial ethics, scientific validity, risk-benefit ratio, social values
MeSH terms
Humans, Informed Consent, Social Values, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Ethics Committees, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review