Cited by 126Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of Extended-Duration Transdermal Nicotine Therapy: A Randomized Trial

Open access
Schnoll, Robert A., Patterson, Freda, Wileyto, E. Paul, Heitjan, Daniel F., Shields, Alexandra E., Asch, David A., Lerman, Caryn·2010·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco dependence is a chronic, relapsing condition that may require extended treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether extended-duration transdermal nicotine therapy increases abstinence from tobacco more than standard-duration therapy in adult smokers. DESIGN: Parallel randomized, placebo-controlled trial from September 2004 to February 2008. Participants and all research personnel except the database manager were blinded to randomization. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00364156) SETTING: Academic center. PARTICIPANTS: 568 adult smokers. INTERVENTION: In an unstratified small block-randomization scheme, participants were randomly assigned to standard therapy (Nicoderm CQ [GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina], 21 mg, for 8 weeks and placebo for 16 weeks) or extended therapy (Nicoderm CQ, 21 mg, for 24 weeks). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed point-prevalence abstinence at weeks 24 and 52. Secondary outcomes were continuous and prolonged abstinence, lapse and recovery events, cost per additional quitter, and side effects and adherence. RESULTS: At week 24, extended therapy produced higher rates of point-prevalence abstinence (31.6% vs. 20.3%; odds ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.23 to 2.66]; P = 0.002), prolonged abstinence (41.5% vs. 26.9%; odds ratio, 1.97 [CI, 1.38 to 2.82]; P = 0.001), and continuous abstinence (19.2% vs. 12.6%; odds ratio, 1.64 [CI, 1.04 to 2.60]; P = 0.032) versus standard therapy. Extended therapy reduced the risk for lapse (hazard ratio, 0.77 [CI, 0.63 to 0.95]; P = 0.013) and increased the chances of recovery from lapses (hazard ratio, 1.47 [CI, 1.17 to 1.84]; P = 0.001). Time to relapse was slower with extended versus standard therapy (hazard ratio, 0.50 [CI, 0.35 to 0.73]; P < 0.001). At week 52, extended therapy produced higher quit rates for prolonged abstinence only (P = 0.027). No differences in side effects and adverse events between groups were found at the extended-treatment assessment. LIMITATION: The generalizability of the findings may be limited because participants were smokers without medical comorbid conditions who were seeking treatment, and differences in adherence across treatment groups were detected. CONCLUSION: Transdermal nicotine for 24 weeks increased biochemically confirmed point-prevalence abstinence and continuous abstinence at week 24, reduced the risk for smoking lapses, and increased the likelihood of recovery to abstinence after a lapse compared with 8 weeks of transdermal nicotine therapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00005

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jonk YC, 2005, Am J Manag Care, 11, 77
  2. Tilson L, 2004, Ir Med J, 97, 270
  3. Fiore MC, 2000, Respir Care, 45, 1196
  4. Stead LF, 2008, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD000146
  5. Hughes JR, 2007, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD000031
  6. McPhillips-Tangum C, 2004, Prev Chronic Dis, 1, A04
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 55, 1194

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–126 of 126

Metadata

Authors
Schnoll, R. A., Patterson, F., Wileyto, E. P., Heitjan, D. F., Shields, A. E., Asch, D. A., & Lerman, C.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Schnoll, Robert A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-02-02
Volume
152
Issue
3
Pages
144-151
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2016263931
Cited by
126
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50CA084718, P50CA/DA-84718, P50CA143187)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
tobacco dependence, smoking cessation, abstinence, relapse, treatment duration, adherence, adverse effects, nicotine withdrawal symptoms
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Smoking, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review