Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial

Gallagher, J. Christopher, Sai, Adarsh, Templin, Thomas, Smith, Lynette·2012·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-[OH]D) is considered the best biomarker of clinical vitamin D status. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of increasing oral doses of vitamin D(3) on serum 25-(OH)D and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in postmenopausal white women with vitamin D insufficiency (defined as a 25-[OH]D level ≤50 nmol/L) in the presence of adequate calcium intake. These results can be used as a guide to estimate the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) (defined as meeting the needs of 97.5% of the population) for vitamin D(3). DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00472823) SETTING: Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. PARTICIPANTS: 163 healthy postmenopausal white women with vitamin D insufficiency enrolled in the winter or spring of 2007 to 2008 and followed for 1 year. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo or vitamin D(3), 400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, or 4800 IU once daily. Daily calcium supplements were provided to increase the total daily calcium intake to 1200 to 1400 mg. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were 25-(OH)D and PTH levels at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The mean baseline 25-(OH)D level was 39 nmol/L. The dose response was curvilinear and tended to plateau at approximately 112 nmol/L in patients receiving more than 3200 IU/d of vitamin D(3). The RDA of vitamin D(3) to achieve a 25-(OH)D level greater than 50 nmol/L was 800 IU/d. A mixed-effects model predicted that 600 IU of vitamin D(3) daily could also meet this goal. Compared with participants with a normal body mass index (<25 kg/m(2)), obese women (≥30 kg/m(2)) had a 25-(OH)D level that was 17.8 nmol/L lower. Parathyroid hormone levels at 12 months decreased with an increasing dose of vitamin D(3) (P = 0.012). Depending on the criteria used, hypercalcemia occurred in 2.8% to 9.0% and hypercalciuria in 12.0% to 33.0% of participants; events were unrelated to dose. LIMITATION: Findings may not be generalizable to other age groups or persons with substantial comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: A vitamin D(3) dosage of 800 IU/d increased serum 25-(OH)D levels to greater than 50 nmol/L in 97.5% of women; however, a model predicted the same response with a vitamin D(3) dosage of 600 IU/d. These results can be used as a guide for the RDA of vitamin D(3), but prospective trials are needed to confirm the clinical significance of these results. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Gallagher, J. C., Sai, A., Templin, T., & Smith, L.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
425-437
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1988221010
Cited by
310
References
2
FWCI
25.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005
The paper
Gallagher, J. C., Sai, A., Templin, T., & Smith, L. (2012). Dose Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.