The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science
Rossiter, M. W. (1993) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631293023002004 · Cited by 1,013
Light, J. S. (1999) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.1353/tech.1999.0128 · Cited by 530
Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama?
Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008 · Cited by 433
Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense
Anderson, E. (1995) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x · Cited by 354
WOMEN, SCIENCE, AND ACADEMIA: Graduate Education and Careers
FOX, M. F. (2001) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124301015005002 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1983-06-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1040-1041
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W4243944139
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-98-6-1040_2
- The paper
- Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. (1983). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-98-6-1040_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
