Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The CAM-S: Development and Validation of a New Scoring System for Delirium Severity in 2 Cohorts

Open access
Inouye, Sharon K., Kosar, Cyrus M., Tommet, Douglas, Schmitt, Eva M., Puelle, Margaret R., Saczynski, Jane S., Marcantonio, Edward R., Jones, Richard N.·2014·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the severity of delirium is essential to advancing clinical care by improved understanding of delirium effect, prognosis, pathophysiology, and response to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new delirium severity measure (CAM-S) based on the Confusion Assessment Method. DESIGN: Validation analysis in 2 independent cohorts. SETTING: Three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: The first cohort included 300 patients aged 70 years or older scheduled for major surgery. The second included 919 medical patients aged 70 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: A 4-item short form and a 10-item long form were developed. Association of the maximum CAM-S score during hospitalization with hospital and posthospital outcomes related to delirium was evaluated. RESULTS: Representative results included adjusted mean length of stay, which increased across levels of short-form severity from 6.5 days (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.9 days) to 12.7 days (CI, 11.2 to 14.3 days) (P for trend < 0.001) and across levels of long-form severity from 5.6 days (CI, 5.1 to 6.1 days) to 11.9 days (CI, 10.8 to 12.9 days) (P for trend < 0.001). Representative results for the composite outcome of adjusted relative risk of death or nursing home residence at 90 days increased progressively across levels of short-form severity from 1.0 (referent) to 2.5 (CI, 1.9 to 3.3) (P for trend < 0.001) and across levels of long-form severity from 1.0 (referent) to 2.5 (CI, 1.6 to 3.7) (P for trend < 0.001). LIMITATION: Data on clinical outcomes were measured in an older data set limited to patients aged 70 years or older. CONCLUSION: The CAM-S provides a new delirium severity measure with strong psychometric properties and strong associations with important clinical outcomes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m13-1927

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Inouye, S. K., Kosar, C. M., Tommet, D., Schmitt, E. M., Puelle, M. R., Saczynski, J. S., Marcantonio, E. R., & Jones, R. N.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
160
Issue
8
Pages
526-533
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2166637321
Cited by
363
References
33
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The CAM-S: Development and Validation of a New Scoring System for Delirium Severity in 2 Cohorts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m13-1927
The paper
Inouye, S. K., Kosar, C. M., Tommet, D., Schmitt, E. M., Puelle, M. R., Saczynski, J. S., Marcantonio, E. R., & Jones, R. N. (2014). The CAM-S: Development and Validation of a New Scoring System for Delirium Severity in 2 Cohorts. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-1927

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.