Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,632

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Moyer, Virginia A., on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*·2014·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lung cancer. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography, chest radiography, and sputum cytologic evaluation for lung cancer screening in asymptomatic persons who are at average or high risk for lung cancer (current or former smokers) and the benefits and harms of these screening tests and of surgical resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The USPSTF also commissioned modeling studies to provide information about the optimum age at which to begin and end screening, the optimum screening interval, and the relative benefits and harms of different screening strategies. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to asymptomatic adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends annual screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography in adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Screening should be discontinued once a person has not smoked for 15 years or develops a health problem that substantially limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to have curative lung surgery. (B recommendation).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m13-2771

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00690 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/jnci/djq434 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301851 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.7326/M13-2316 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209120 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/cncr.28326 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.08.040 · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.08.040
  8. 10.1164/rccm.200901-0076OC · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200736 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328351e1b6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1001/jama.2011.1591 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1001/jama.2012.5521 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.060 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3322/caac.21172 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,632

Metadata

Authors
Moyer, V. A., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
160
Issue
5
Pages
330-338
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2139277921
Cited by
2,632
References
1
FWCI
160.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acpjournals.org/journal/aim/text-and-data-mining (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m13-2771
The paper
Moyer, V. A., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*. (2014). Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-2771

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.