Cited by 150Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and InterventionsHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Firearm-Related Hospitalization and Risk for Subsequent Violent Injury, Death, or Crime Perpetration: A Cohort Study

Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali, Zatzick, Douglas, Wang, Jin, Mills, Brianna M., Simonetti, Joseph A., Fan, Mary D., Rivara, Frederick P.·2015·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Risk for violent victimization or crime perpetration after firearm-related hospitalization (FRH) must be determined to inform the need for future interventions. Objective To compare the risk for subsequent violent injury, death, or crime perpetration among patients with an FRH, those hospitalized for noninjury reasons, and the general population. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting All hospitals in Washington. Patients Patients with an FRH and a random sample of those with a non-injury-related hospitalization in 2006 to 2007 (index hospitalization). Measurements Primary outcomes included subsequent FRH, firearm-related death, and the combined outcome of firearm- or violence-related arrest ascertained through 2011. Results Among patients with an index FRH (n = 613), rates of subsequent FRH, firearm-related death, and firearm- or violence-related arrest were 329 (95% CI, 142 to 649), 100 (CI, 21 to 293), and 4221 (CI, 3352 to 5246) per 100 000 person-years, respectively. Compared with the general population, standardized incidence ratios among patients with an index FRH were 30.1 (CI, 14.9 to 61.0) for a subsequent FRH and 7.3 (CI, 2.4 to 22.9) for firearm-related death. In survival analyses that accounted for competing risks, patients with an index FRH were at greater risk for subsequent FRH (subhazard ratio [sHR], 21.2 [CI, 7.0 to 64.0]), firearm-related death (sHR, 4.3 [CI, 1.3 to 14.1]), and firearm- or violence-related arrest (sHR, 2.7 [CI, 2.0 to 3.5]) t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-2362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Without any interventions after discharge, individuals hospitalized with firearm injuries have a 7.3-fold greater chance of dying from a firearm injury than those in the general population.

    “Without any interventions after discharge, individuals hospitalized with firearm injuries have a 30-fold greater chance of being re-hospitalized with a firearm injury and a 7.3-fold greater chance of dying from a firearm injury than those in the general population [16].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Without any interventions after discharge, individuals hospitalized with firearm injuries have a 30-fold greater chance of being re-hospitalized with a firearm injury than those in the general population.

    “Without any interventions after discharge, individuals hospitalized with firearm injuries have a 30-fold greater chance of being re-hospitalized with a firearm injury and a 7.3-fold greater chance of dying from a firearm injury than those in the general population [16].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The comprehensive and representative sample may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.

    “This may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.15,18,33-44”
  • Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.

    “Among the four studies that conducted a survival analysis, cumulative incidence for recurrent firearm injuries ranged from approximately 2% after five years to 16% after 10 years.18,35,42,44”
  • The time-based approach is most often applied to studies of firearm injury recurrence, with days since prior injury ranging from 1 to 90 days depending on the study.

    “The time-based approach is most often applied to studies of firearm injury recurrence, with days since prior injury ranging from 1 to 90 days, depending on the study [7][8][9]”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 150

Authors
Rowhani-Rahbar, A., Zatzick, D., Wang, J., Mills, B. M., Simonetti, J. A., Fan, M. D., & Rivara, F. P.
Affiliations
  • From the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2015-04-07
Volume
162
Issue
7
Pages
492-500
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2152980656
Cited by
150
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
firearm-related injuries, violent injury, firearm deaths, violent victimization, hospitalization outcomes, competing risks
MeSH terms
Adult, Crime, Female, Firearms, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Violence, Washington, Wounds, Gunshot, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review