Cited by 187Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Treatments for the Prevention and Management of Suicide: A Systematic Review

D'Anci, Kristen E., Uhl, Stacey, Giradi, Gina, Martin, Constance·2019·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Suicide is a growing public health problem, with the national rate in the United States increasing by 30% from 2000 to 2016. Purpose: To assess the benefits and harms of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to prevent suicide and reduce suicide behaviors in at-risk adults. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and other databases from November 2011 through May 2018. Study Selection: Systematic reviews (SRs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed nonpharmacologic or pharmacologic therapies for adults at risk for suicide. Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data and assessed study quality, and a second investigator checked abstractions and assessments for accuracy. Data Synthesis: Eight SRs and 15 RCTs were included. The evidence for psychological interventions suggests that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) reduces suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness compared with treatment as usual (TAU). Limited evidence suggests that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) reduces suicidal ideation compared with wait-list control or crisis planning. The evidence for pharmacologic treatments suggests that ketamine reduces suicidal ideation with minimal adverse events compared with placebo or midazolam. Lithium reduces rates of suicide among patients with unipolar or bipolar mood disorders compared with placebo. However, no differences were observed between lithium and other medications in reducing suicide. Limitation: Qualitative synthesis of new evidence with existing meta-analyses, methodological shortcomings of studies, heterogeneity of nonpharmacologic interventions, and limited evidence for pharmacologic treatments and harms. Conclusion: Both CBT and DBT showed modest benefit in reducing suicidal ideation compared with TAU or wait-list control, and CBT also reduced suicide attempts compared with TAU. Ketamine and lithium reduced the rate of suicide compared with placebo, but there was limited information on harms. Limited data are available to support the efficacy of other nonpharmacologic or pharmacologic interventions. Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration. (PROSPERO: CRD42018104978).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m19-0869

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D'Anci et al. systematically reviewed treatments for suicide prevention, reporting that cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based interventions were among the most frequently supported approaches.

    “D’Anci et al. [53] systematically reviewed treatments for suicide prevention, reporting that cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based interventions were among the most frequently supported approaches.”
  • Prior reviews indicate the relevance of cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based strategies for psychological pain and identify psychological pain as both a state and trait phenomenon.

    “Overall, prior reviews [53,54,55,56,57] indicate the relevance of cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based strategies and identify psychological pain as both a state and trait phenomenon, supporting psychological pain as a meaningful intervention target.”
  • Psychological pain domains-states and traits-are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention.

    “domains—states and traits—are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention, underscoring the centrality of psychological pain in suicide risk and the need for targeted interventions aimed at broadening emotional and behavioural coping repertoires.”
  • Multiple interventions have evidence of efficacy in reducing suicide risk, including cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, and active contact and follow-up interventions.

    “Multiple interventions have evidence of efficacy in reducing suicide risk, including cognitive behavioral therapy,3,4 dialectical behavioral therapy,3 and active contact and follow-up interventions.5,6”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Anci, K. E., Uhl, S., Giradi, G., & Martin, C.
Affiliations
  • ECRI Institute, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania (K.E.D., S.U., G.G., C.M.)
  • ECRI Institute (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
171
Issue
5
Pages
334-342
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2971153040
Cited by
187
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
20.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, ketamine, lithium, bipolar disorder, unipolar mood disorders, non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacological interventions, at-risk adults, hopelessness
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Suicide Prevention, Antidepressive Agents, Crisis Intervention, Humans, Ketamine, Patient Education as Topic, Risk Factors, Suicide, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Lithium Compounds, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review