Cited by 184Personality Disorders and PsychopathologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

A randomized trial of brief dialectical behaviour therapy skills training in suicidal patients suffering from borderline disorder

McMain, Shelley F., Guimond, Tim, Barnhart, Ryan, Habinski, Liat, Streiner, David L.·2017·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Evidence‐based therapies for borderline personality disorder (BPD) are lengthy and scarce. Data on brief interventions are limited, and their role in the treatment of BPD is unclear. Our aim was therefore to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of brief dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) skills training as an adjunctive intervention for high suicide risk in patients with BPD. Method: Eighty‐four out‐patients were randomized to 20 weeks of DBT skills (n = 42) or a waitlist (WL; n = 42). The primary outcome was frequency of suicidal or non‐suicidal self‐injurious (NSSI) episodes. Assessments were conducted at baseline 10, 20 and 32 weeks. Results: DBT participants showed greater reductions than the WL participants on suicidal and NSSI behaviours between baseline and 32 weeks (P < 0.0001). DBT participants showed greater improvements than controls on measures of anger, distress tolerance and emotion regulation at 32 weeks. Conclusions: This abbreviated intervention is a viable option that may be a useful adjunctive intervention for the treatment of high‐risk behaviour associated with the acute phase of BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12664

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMain, S. F., Guimond, T., Barnhart, R., Habinski, L., & Streiner, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Royal Alexandra Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
McMain, Shelley F.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-13
Volume
135
Issue
2
Pages
138-148
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2551164964
Cited by
184
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ontario Mental Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, skills training, borderline personality disorder, suicide risk, suicidal behavior, non-suicidal self-injury, brief intervention, adjunctive therapy, anger, distress tolerance, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review