Cited by 79Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive behavioural therapy halves the risk of repeated suicide attempts: systematic review.

Open access
Gøtzsche, Peter C, Gøtzsche, Pernille K·2017·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To study whether cognitive behavioural therapy decreases suicide attempts in people with previous suicide attempts. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: Randomised trials that compare cognitive behavioural therapy with treatment as usual. Participants: Patients who had engaged in any type of suicide attempt in the six months prior to trial entry resulting in presentation to clinical services. Main outcome measure: Suicide attempt. Results: We included ten trials, eight from Cochrane reviews and two from our updated searches (1241 patients, 219 of whom had at least one new suicide attempt). Cognitive behavioural therapy compared to treatment as usual reduced the risk of a new suicide attempt; risk ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.73; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 57%. Only seven suicides were reported (3 versus 4). One trial had an unusually large effect; if this trial is excluded, the risk ratio becomes 0.61 (0.46–0.80) and the heterogeneity in the results disappears (I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: Cognitive behavioural therapy reduces not only repeated self-harm but also repeated suicide attempts. It should be the preferred treatment for all patients with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076817731904

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gøtzsche, P. C., & Gøtzsche, P. K.
Affiliations
Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2017-10
Volume
110
Issue
10
Pages
404-410
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2765875828
Cited by
79
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, suicide attempts, repeated suicide attempts, self-harm, depression, suicide prevention, usual care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review