Cited by 154Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationHistory of Computing Technologies

The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information

Dourish, Paul·2017·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

An argument that the material arrangements of information—how it is represented and interpreted—matter significantly for our experience of information and information systems. Virtual entities that populate our digital experience, like e-books, virtual worlds, and online stores, are backed by the large-scale physical infrastructures of server farms, fiber optic cables, power plants, and microwave links. But another domain of material constraints also shapes digital living: the digital representations sketched on whiteboards, encoded into software, stored in databases, loaded into computer memory, and transmitted on networks. These digital representations encode aspects of our everyday world and make them available for digital processing. The limits and capacities of those representations carry significant consequences for digital society. In The Stuff of Bits, Paul Dourish examines the specific materialities that certain digital objects exhibit. He presents four case studies: emulation, the creation of a “virtual” computer inside another; digital spreadsheets and their role in organizational practice; relational databases and the issue of “the databaseable”; and the evolution of digital networking and the representational entailments of network protocols. These case studies demonstrate how a materialist account can offer an entry point to broader concerns—questions of power, policy, and polity in the realm of the digital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/10999.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nostr and Farcaster embed a politics of sovereignty, privileging user control even at the expense of relative ease of use.

    “Nostr and Farcaster embed a politics of sovereignty, privileging user control even at the expense of relative ease of use [36].”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dourish, P.
Corresponding author
Dourish, Paul
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2017-04-28
OpenAlex
W4230940151
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
8.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
Keywords
materiality of information, digital representation, information systems, emulation, virtual machines, relational databases, network protocols, digital networking, materialist theory, digital society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review