The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge
Abstract
Exploring the software design, social practices, and collaboration theory that would be needed to support group cognition; collective knowledge that is constructed by small groups online. Innovative uses of global and local networks of linked computers make new ways of collaborative working, learning, and acting possible. In Group Cognition Gerry Stahl explores the technological and social reconfigurations that are needed to achieve computer-supported collaborative knowledge building—group cognition that transcends the limits of individual cognition. Computers can provide active media for social group cognition where ideas grow through the interactions within groups of people; software functionality can manage group discourse that results in shared understandings, new meanings, and collaborative learning. Stahl offers software design prototypes, analyzes empirical instances of collaboration, and elaborates a theory of collaboration that takes the group, rather than the individual, as the unit of analysis. Stahl's design studies concentrate on mechanisms to support group formation, multiple interpretive perspectives, and the negotiation of group knowledge in applications as varied as collaborative curriculum development by teachers, writing summaries by students, and designing space voyages by NASA engineers. His empirical analysis shows how, in small-group collaborations, the group constructs intersubjective knowledge that emerges from and appears in the discourse itself. This discovery of group meaning becomes the springboard for Stahl's outline of a social theory of collaborative knowing. Stahl also discusses such related issues as the distinction between meaning making at the group level and interpretation at the individual level, appropriate research methodology, philosophical directions for group cognition theory, and suggestions for further empirical work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841
A research framework of smart education
Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 · Cited by 782
Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0 · Cited by 351
A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning
Yang, X. (2023) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9 · Cited by 199
Chuang, H.-H. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9438-5 · Cited by 61
Greenhow, C., & Belbas, B. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9023-3 · Cited by 60
ChatGPT in higher education—a student's perspective
Shuhaiber, A., Kuhail, M. A., & Salman, S. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100565 · Cited by 55
“Students’ Willingness to Practice Collaborative Learning.”
Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2020) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280 · Cited by 54
Berlanga, A. J., van Rosmalen, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Sloep, P. B. (2012) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00425.x · Cited by 34
Student Engagement in Open, Distance, and Digital Education
Bond, M., & Bergdahl, N. (2022) · Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_79-1 · Cited by 33
Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions
Öztok, M. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9233-7 · Cited by 32
The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition
Goldstone, R. L., & Theiner, G. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1295635 · Cited by 31
Jung, J., Shin, Y., & Zumbach, J. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1619592 · Cited by 30
Design and application of automatic feedback scaffolding in forums to promote learning
Wang, Q., Rose, C. P., Ma, N., Jiang, S., Bao, H., & Li, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2022.3156914 · Cited by 15
Group Cognition and Collaborative AI
Koch, J., & Oulasvirta, A. (2018) · Human–Computer Interaction Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_15 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Stahl, G.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2006-03-24
- OpenAlex
- W4243048058
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.49
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.