Cited by 119Embodied and Extended CognitionMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Reafference and the origin of the self in early nervous system evolution

Open access
Jékely, Gáspár, Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Keijzer, Fred·2021·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B

Abstract

Discussions of the function of early nervous systems usually focus on a causal flow from sensors to effectors, by which an animal coordinates its actions with exogenous changes in its environment. We propose, instead, that much early sensing was reafferent; it was responsive to the consequences of the animal's own actions. We distinguish two general categories of reafference—translocational and deformational—and use these to survey the distribution of several often-neglected forms of sensing, including gravity sensing, flow sensing and proprioception. We discuss sensing of these kinds in sponges, ctenophores, placozoans, cnidarians and bilaterians. Reafference is ubiquitous, as ongoing action, especially whole-body motility, will almost inevitably influence the senses. Corollary discharge—a pathway or circuit by which an animal tracks its own actions and their reafferent consequences—is not a necessary feature of reafferent sensing but a later-evolving mechanism. We also argue for the importance of reafferent sensing to the evolution of the body-self, a form of organization that enables an animal to sense and act as a single unit. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Basal cognition: multicellularity, neurons and the cognitive lens’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2019.0764

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motile predators must be able to subtract their own motion from incoming sensory information to accurately track prey or conspecifics, via reafference.

    “For example, motile predators must be able to subtract their own motion from incoming sensory information to accurately track prey or conspecifics, via a process known as reafference, which may have been one of the earliest functions of neuronal systems [15,33,34].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Flow sensing section (page unavailable) describes filtering self-generated sensory signals to improve detection of external changes, including suppression by corollary discharge. It does not establish that motile predators must do this to track prey or conspecifics. The Abstract also distinguishes early reafferent sensing from corollary discharge, which it describes as a later-evolving mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early neural systems had a feedback loop used for reafference.

    “It has been suggested that early neural systems had just such a feedback loop, which was used for reafference ([34]; reafference is also present in extant sponges and ctenophores, supporting its early origins [33]).”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [89]Chapman RF. 1971 The insects, their structure and function. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jékely, G., Godfrey-Smith, P., & Keijzer, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • 2 School of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Jékely, Gáspár
  • Keijzer, Fred
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
376
Issue
1821
Pages
20190764-20190764
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W3126220937
Cited by
119
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-392)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
reafference, body self, proprioception, gravity sensing, flow sensing, corollary discharge, ctenophores, placozoans, Cnidaria, bilaterians, basal cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Efferent Pathways, Nervous System, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Porifera, Proprioception, Ctenophora, Placozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review