Artificial embodied circuits uncover neural architectures of vertebrate visuomotor behaviors
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the neural and biomechanical mechanisms of sensorimotor transformations, we constructed realistic neuromechanical simulations (simZFish) of the zebrafish optomotor response, a visual stabilization behavior. By computationally reproducing the body mechanics, physical body-water interactions, hydrodynamics, visual environments, and experimentally derived neural network architectures, we closely replicated the behavior of real larval zebrafish. Changing lens properties and retinal connectivity revealed why the lower posterior visual field drives optimal optomotor responses in the simZFish. In virtual rivers, the simZFish performed rheotaxis autonomously by using current-induced optic flow patterns as navigational cues. Last, experiments with a physical robot (ZBot) validated the role of embodied sensorimotor circuits in maintaining position in a real river.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
41 of 64 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
These visuomotor computations can compensate for water current-induced displacement, especially where mechanosensory information from the lateral line organ is not reliable.
“In principle, this suggests that these visuomotor computations can compensate for water current-induced displacement, especially in situations where mechanosensory information from the lateral line organ is not reliable (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
The paper’s Abstract says flow-induced displacement is readily detectable as visual whole-field motion, and explains that a fish in a homogeneous current cannot detect the flow without cues from an external frame of reference. It does not establish that the particular visuomotor computations in the citing sentence compensate for displacement, or test their use when lateral-line information is unreliable. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
When initialized with different heading directions, simZFish eventually oriented its heading direction against the flow, performing rheotaxis, as observed in real fish maintaining position in rivers.
“When initialized with different heading directions, simZFish eventually oriented its heading direction against the flow, performing rheotaxis, as observed in real fish maintaining position in rivers (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
The Abstract reports that real larval zebrafish oriented and swam against water flow in a laboratory tube, and that their ability to hold position improved with stronger flow gradients. It does not report observing fish maintain position in rivers; its discussion of small rivers concerns where the proposed mechanism might apply. The simZFish result is the citing authors’ own result, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Systematic manipulations of sensory features, including simZFish's optical lens and retinal connectivity, revealed key factors driving neural architecture and response characteristics.
“Further, we used systematic manipulations of sensory features, including simZFish’s optical lens and retinal connectivity, to reveal key factors driving neural architecture and response characteristics (31, 37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] source
The Introduction (p. 4) reports mapping retinal inputs and reconstructing optic-flow-responsive neurons, supporting the retinal-connectivity and neural-architecture aspects. The paper does not describe simZFish, an optical-lens manipulation, or systematic manipulations of those simulated features. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] source
The paper’s Summary and conclusions discusses multisensory rheotaxis and proposes future mapping of neural circuitry; its methodological-pitfalls section discusses sensory-deprivation treatments. Searches for simZFish, an optical lens, retinal connectivity, and systematic manipulations revealing neural architecture found no passage addressing the attributed result. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
These neurons exist in real zebrafish in at least eight mirror symmetric sets of direction-selective functional response types.
“These neurons exist in real zebrafish in at least eight mirror symmetric sets of direction-selective functional response types (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
- Findingown data
simZFish spontaneous bout frequency is 0.6 Hz, compared to zebrafish 0.67 Hz ± 0.09 Hz.
“To modulate the spontaneous bout frequency (simZFish: 0.6 Hz; zebrafish: 0.67 Hz +/− 0.09 Hz), the lPTs connect to symmetric neural nodes, representing the diencephalic nuclei of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (nMLF) known to control bout frequency (27), tail posture, and bout initialisation (41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] source
The Results section on whole-field visual motion reports that interbout duration changes with grating speed, but gives no spontaneous bout frequency of 0.67 ± 0.09 Hz. Searches for the stated frequency, its uncertainty, and spontaneous bout frequency found no passage establishing that value in our copy; the simZFish value is likewise not reported. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] source
- Study design and conductcitation
The artificial neural architecture was synthesized from anatomical, functional, and computational findings, creating an embedded multi-layer network model of the OMR visuomotor pathways consisting of rate-coding artificial neurons.
“To achieve a biorealistic artificial neural architecture, we synthesized anatomical (30, 41), functional (25, 31, 32), and computational findings (25), creating an embedded multi-layer network model of the OMR visuomotor pathways consisting of rate-coding artificial neurons (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] source
The Abstract and the section on neural correlates of adaptive motor control report functional observations during optomotor behavior and map four types of neural dynamics to brain areas. The Discussion proposes a possible error-signal computation, but does not establish a computational finding or describe an embedded, multilayer network of rate-coding artificial neurons. The citing authors describe that architecture as their own creation, rather than attributing it directly to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] source
- cites [25] source
- Premisecitation
The upper visual field contains little information about visual motion generated by being dragged underwater.
“This upper visual field contains little information about visual motion generated by being dragged underwater (55).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
The Summary (p. 3) says the upper visual field contains little color, not little information about visual motion. The photoreceptor discussion (p. 9) suggests that looking downward may support detection of optic flow on the ground, but does not assess motion information in the upper field. Searches for visual motion, optic flow, and being dragged underwater found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Medial/forward motion-responsive neurons are the most frequent monocular response type in real zebrafish, responding to medial and forward motion.
“Moreover, medial/forward motion-responsive neurons are the most frequent monocular response type in real zebrafish (iMM (25), cf.,’MoNL’ (32)), which respond to medial (nasalward) and forward (translational) motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] source
In Results, ‘Most Pt Neurons Can Be Classified into a Few Functional Response Types’ (page unavailable), the paper identifies iMM as a monocular class responsive to medial motion with a strong preference for forward motion. It does not establish in the available text that iMM is the most frequent monocular response type; it says only that eight response types occurred at elevated frequency. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [32] source
- Findingcitation
Like real zebrafish, simZFish swims in bouts of rapid tail undulations and passive glides.
“Like real zebrafish (40), simZFish swims in bouts of rapid tail undulations and passive glides (Supplementary Movie 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
The Results section (Validations on numerical and experimental methodologies; page unavailable) describes observed zebrafish tail beats. But the Experiment setup section says the study investigated only quasi-steady cruising with cyclic motion; it does not report bouts alternating with passive glides. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In a virtual river, simZFish's artificial embodied neural circuits enabled it to swim against a virtual water flow, performing rheotaxis.
“Furthermore, when experiencing a virtual river, simZFish’s artificial embodied neural circuits enabled it to swim against a virtual water flow, performing a behavior known as rheotaxis (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
The Modeling section and Extended Data Fig. 5 describe a modeled fish performing rheotaxis in a virtual flow field. They describe a simulated particle following a behavioral algorithm, not simZFish or artificial embodied neural circuits; that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The open-source simZFish faithfully reproduces the zebrafish OMR using experimentally observed neural activity.
“Benefitting from detailed experimental data (25, 29–34) and recent advances in physics simulation technologies (35), our open-source simZFish faithfully reproduces the zebrafish OMR, utilizing experimentally observed neural activity (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim7 of 8 sources checked- cites [25] source
- cites [29] source
The Results sections on motion integration report experimentally observed neural activity in larval zebrafish, and the Introduction identifies their motion-following behavior as the optomotor response (page numbers unavailable). The paper also compares a network model with measured neural dynamics, but it does not assess simZFish or establish that simZFish faithfully reproduces the OMR. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] source
- cites [31] source
- cites [32] source
- cites [33] source
- cites [34] source
- cites [35] source
- Study design and conductown data
Initializing simZFish's circuits with experimentally derived best-fit connection weights and minimal additional tuning achieved functional connectivity with activation patterns similar to zebrafish neurons for direction and eye-specific stimuli.
“By initializing simZFish’s circuits with our experimentally derived, best-fit (25) connection weights (Fig. S3G), minimal additional tuning achieved functional connectivity that demonstrated similar activation patterns to zebrafish neurons to the direction and eye-specific stimuli (Fig. 2F, G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
- Interpretationown data
The simZFish circuits are, in principle, sufficient to drive visually guided rheotaxis without other sensory input.
“Whereas multiple sensory modalities play a role in rheotaxis (20, 36), we demonstrate that the simZFish circuits are, in principle, sufficient to drive visually guided rheotaxis without other sensory input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
simZFish circuits alone can effectively drive rheotaxis when visual information is available.
“Although multiple sensory modalities, including mechanosensation and proprioception, influence rheotaxis (36, 71), simZFish circuits alone can effectively drive rheotaxis if visual information is available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] source
- cites [71] source
The Introduction describes the mechanosensory lateral line as contributing to rheotaxis, but our copy does not identify proprioception as a contributing modality. The citation is attached to that sensory-modalities clause, not to the citing authors’ subsequent claim about simZFish circuits and visual information; this paper tested larval zebrafish with visual cues eliminated (Methods, “Lateral line isolation and rheotaxis trials”). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Brain-scale imaging and causal manipulations via optogenetics in zebrafish are costly and technically challenging, especially during movement.
“Although brain scale imaging (25, 60, 68) and causal manipulations (69) via optogenetics are possible in zebrafish, they are costly and technically challenging, particularly during movement (70).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Results section on whole-brain imaging says the fish were restrained during imaging, and the STAR*METHODS imaging section describes immobilization to prevent movement artifacts. This supports the difficulty of imaging during movement, but the paper does not establish that these methods are costly or that optogenetic manipulations face the same difficulty. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [60] source
The Kinematics recordings and Flow recordings sections (page unavailable) describe filming swimming larvae and measuring water flow, not brain-scale imaging or optogenetic manipulation. Searches for those methods and for technical challenges during movement found no passage assessing their cost or difficulty. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [68] source
- cites [69] source
- cites [70] source
- Interpretationcitation
Restricting retinal-pretectal connectivity to only one quadrant may confer computational advantages by allowing combined processing of forward/medial and backward/lateral motion, which drive or reduce locomotion, respectively.
“Restricting retinal-pretectal connectivity to only one quadrant, may confer computational advantages, allowing combined processing of forward/medial and backward/lateral motion which drive or reduce locomotion, respectively (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Results section on eye- and direction-specific motion reports that medial motion drives forward swimming while lateral motion suppresses it. The pretectal-activity Results section also describes integration of monocular motion signals. However, our copy does not describe retinal-pretectal connectivity as restricted to one quadrant or propose a computational advantage from that restriction; the Discussion instead raises possible functional inefficiencies in eye-specific pathways. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The simulations explain why pretectal neurons in real zebrafish preferentially respond to motion in the lower posterior visual field.
“Specifically, our simulations explain why pretectal neurons in real zebrafish preferentially respond to motion in the lower posterior visual field (25, 30, 31), because with laterally positioned eyes, translational, bottom-projected visual stimuli generate opposing rotational optic flow patterns (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Results section on pretectal activity reports that zebrafish pretectal neurons respond to motion, and the Methods say motion stimuli were presented from below. Neither passage establishes that the neurons preferentially respond to the lower posterior visual field; the paper does not provide that spatial preference as an explanation for the citing authors’ simulations. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] source
The Measurement of motor-related activity section reports neurons near the pretectum whose activity correlates with visual input. It does not report that pretectal neurons preferentially respond to motion in the lower posterior visual field; searches for that location and for receptive-field selectivity found no such result. The citing authors' simulation-based explanation is their own, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
The Summary (p. 2) reports that zebrafish pretectal neurons respond to optic flow, and the Results (pp. 8–9) examine motion presented from the side and below. But those passages do not establish that pretectal neurons preferentially respond to motion in the lower posterior visual field; the reported locations are neural structures, not a preferred region of visual space. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Changing lens properties and retinal connectivity revealed why the lower posterior visual field drives optimal optomotor responses in simZFish.
“Changing lens properties and retinal connectivity revealed why the lower posterior visual field drives optimal optomotor responses in simZFish, explaining receptive field properties observed in real zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The predicted neuronal response types were identified via two-photon calcium imaging in live zebrafish.
“When challenged with novel visual stimuli, simZFish predicted previously unknown neuronal response types, which we identified via two-photon calcium imaging in the live brain of real zebrafish and incorporated to update the simZFish neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The simZFish simulation closely reproduced the behavior of real larval zebrafish.
“By computationally reproducing the body mechanics, physical body-water interactions, hydrodynamics, visual environments, and experimentally derived neural network architectures, we closely replicated the behavior of real larval zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: To model real animals' neural dynamics accurately, one must validate sensorimotor loops in complex physical environments and account for nuanced behavioral outcomes.
- Findingown data
When challenged with novel visual stimuli, simZFish predicted previously unknown neuronal response types.
“When challenged with novel visual stimuli, simZFish predicted previously unknown neuronal response types, which we identified via two-photon calcium imaging in the live brain of real zebrafish and incorporated to update the simZFish neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Focal length does not affect areas without contours, such as the simulated featureless sky, which appears like the real sky for submersed zebrafish when looking upward through Snell's window at ~42° elevation.
“When analyzed for optic flow, focal length does not affect areas without contours, such as the simulated, featureless ‘sky’ above the horizon, appearing like the real sky for submersed zebrafish when looking upward through Snell’s window, ~42° elevation (54).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
- Findingown data
simZFish performs forward, left, and right swim bouts like real zebrafish.
“Comparing general kinematic functionality, simZFish performs forward, left, and right swim bouts like real zebrafish (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Movie 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When conflicting forward and backward motion was presented to either eye, mimicking rotational or shearing motion, real zebrafish bout rate remained near spontaneous levels.
“When conflicting forward and backward motion was presented to either eye (BF, FB), mimicking rotational or shearing motion, real zebrafish bout rate remained near spontaneous levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The identified neuronal response types were incorporated to update the simZFish neural network.
“When challenged with novel visual stimuli, simZFish predicted previously unknown neuronal response types, which we identified via two-photon calcium imaging in the live brain of real zebrafish and incorporated to update the simZFish neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
simZFish recapitulates the characteristic trimodal behavioral distribution of real zebrafish, with frequent forward swims (0°±5°) and balanced leftward and rightward routine turns (~±35°).
“Overall, simZFish recapitulates the characteristic trimodal behavioral distribution of real zebrafish, with frequent forward swims (0°+/− 5°) and balanced leftward and rightward routine turns (~+/−35°) (Fig. 3D, S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Focal length mainly changes the amount of measurable optic flow for stimuli containing orthogonal light-dark edges.
“Analysis of the simZFish perceived sensory information shows that focal length mainly changes the amount of measurable optic flow for stimuli containing orthogonal light-dark edges (Fig. S5B–H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In virtual rivers, simZFish performed rheotaxis autonomously by using current-induced optic flow patterns as navigational cues, compensating for simulated water flow.
“In virtual rivers, simZFish performed rheotaxis autonomously by using current-induced optic flow patterns as navigational cues, compensating for the simulated water flow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lenses with shorter focal lengths produce expected perspective exaggerations, rendering closer features larger and more distant features smaller.
“However, contoured features, such as river rocks, reveal that lenses with shorter focal lengths produce expected perspective exaggerations, rendering closer features larger and those that are more distant smaller (Supplementary Movie 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
simZFish1.0 predicted strong turning when tested with novel stimuli it had not previously encountered, including forward-moving gratings to one eye and backward to the other.
“Unexpectedly, simZFish1.0 predicted strong turning when tested with these novel stimuli it had not previously encountered, including forward-moving gratings to one eye and backward to the other (FB, Fig. 5B, S6C–F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ZBot experiments in a real river with rich visual stimuli and complex fluid dynamics confirmed that the artificial circuits are effective in counteracting real water currents.
“Corroborating the results from simulations, ZBot experiments in a real river with rich visual stimuli and complex fluid dynamics confirmed that these artificial circuits are effective in counteracting real water currents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Experiments with the physical robot ZBot validated the role of embodied sensorimotor circuits in maintaining position in a real river with complex fluid dynamics and visual environments.
“Finally, experiments with a physical robot (ZBot) validated the role of embodied sensorimotor circuits in maintaining position in a real river with complex fluid dynamics and visual environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In contrast, orthogonal stimuli only activate either inferior or superior DSGCs across the lower visual field.
“In contrast, orthogonal stimuli only activate either inferior or superior DSGCs across the lower visual field (Fig. 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Due to perspective distortion of bottom-projected parallel forward stimuli, local optic flow co-activates inferior and anterior selective DSGCs in the lower posterior retina and superior and anterior selective DSGCs in the lower anterior retina.
“Due to perspective distortion of bottom-projected parallel, forward stimuli, the local optic flow co-activates inferior and anterior selective DSGCs in the lower posterior retina and superior and anterior selective DSGCs in the lower anterior retina (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When comparing bout probabilities, the relative proportion of right, forward, and left bouts, there is strong quantitative behavioral correspondence between simZFish and real zebrafish, with exceptions for challenges in fitting behavior to backward motion.
“Nonetheless, when comparing bout probabilities, the relative proportion of right, forward, and left bouts, we find strong quantitative behavioral correspondence, with exceptions for challenges in fitting behavior to backward motion (Fig. 3F, S4C–E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
simZFish1.0 exhibited difficulties in modeling neural activity and behavior to backward motion.
“However, simZFish1.0, relying on neurons classified by their responses to these stimuli, exhibited difficulties in modeling neural activity and behavior to backward motion (Fig. 3F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incorporating these subtypes into simZFish1.0 drastically improved its behavior.
“Updating the simulated neural architecture, we incorporated these subtypes into simZFish1.0, drastically improving its behavior (Fig. 5G, S7H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With laterally positioned eyes, translational, bottom-projected visual stimuli generate opposing rotational optic flow patterns.
“Specifically, our simulations explain why pretectal neurons in real zebrafish preferentially respond to motion in the lower posterior visual field (25, 30, 31), because with laterally positioned eyes, translational, bottom-projected visual stimuli generate opposing rotational optic flow patterns (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In head-fixed OMR experiments, neuronal responses were comparable across ZBot, simZFish, and real zebrafish.
“As expected, we observed comparable neuronal responses across ZBot, simZFish, and real zebrafish, suggesting that ZBot visual processing aligns with that of real zebrafish in these laboratory conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Real fish in natural rivers receive visual inputs that are richer than those that can be simulated, including differences in texture, turbidity, and lighting.
- Findingown data
In head-fixed OMR experiments, ZBot and simZFish camera views corresponded strongly.
“These controlled experiments demonstrate the strong correspondence between ZBot and simZFish camera views (Fig. 6B, C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Real fish in natural rivers receive visual inputs that are richer than those that can be simulated, including differences in texture, turbidity, and lighting.
- Findingown data
Even with active OMR circuits, ZBot eventually drifted downstream, similar to simZFish in faster virtual water currents.
“Nonetheless, even with active OMR circuits, the ZBot eventually drifted downstream, like the simZFish in faster virtual water currents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ZBot with an activated OMR circuit maintained its position 188% longer than when drifting with motors off.
“Further, the activated OMR circuit allowed the ZBot to maintain its position far (188%) longer than drifting with motors off (Fig. 6G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quantitative comparisons of bout probabilities confirmed that simZFish2.0 functionally replicates real zebrafish behavior.
“Quantitative comparisons of bout probabilities confirmed that simZFish2.0 functionally replicates real zebrafish behavior (Fig. 5I–J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ZBot with an active OMR circuit remained in the drone's field of view 57% longer than when its OMR circuit was blinded with cameras off.
“As predicted from our simulations (Fig. 3G), the OMR circuit aided the ZBot to maintain its position in the river as it remained in the drone’s field of view notably (57%) longer than when its OMR circuit was blinded (cameras off), but spontaneously swimming in bouts in random directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Optic flow processing is biased to the lower visual field.
“By systematically analyzing visual input through simZFish’s eyes (Fig. 4), we confirmed that optic flow processing is biased to the lower visual field, where most contrast and chromatic content is found in underwater habitats (54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The OMR circuit enabled ZBot to navigate upstream despite highly variable and blurry visual input in the river.
“Remarkably, the OMR circuit enabled the ZBot to navigate upstream despite the highly variable and blurry visual input in the river (Fig. S10B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
simZFish's visuomotor circuits are sufficient to reorient upstream.
“Beyond replicating controlled lab experiments, simZFish’s visuomotor circuits are sufficient to reorient upstream (Fig. 3G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Incorporating these neurons into simZFish improved behavioral accuracy.
“Incorporating these neurons into simZFish improved behavioral accuracy and provided a valuable strategy for reverse-engineering visuomotor systems, uncovering previously overlooked, behaviorally relevant neural computations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
simZFish and the physical ZBot generate OMR behaviors like live zebrafish.
“Equipped with realistic brain-scale neural circuits, from photoreceptors to motor neurons, simZFish and the physical ZBot generate OMR behaviors like live zebrafish (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
ZBot traveled twice as far per bout as real zebrafish.
“ZBot traveled twice as far per bout as the real zebrafish, likely due to differences in fluid dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Systematic manipulation of physiological and circuit connectivity features shows that embodiment shapes neural activity, circuit architecture, and behavior.
“Through systematic manipulation of physiological and circuit connectivity features, impossible in biological experiments, we demonstrate how embodiment shapes neural activity, circuit architecture, and behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: To grasp how neural circuits work, one must test the whole brain-body system in settings that resemble the real world.
- Interpretationown data
The lower posterior visual field driving optimal OMR in simZFish explains receptive field properties observed in real zebrafish.
“Changing lens properties and retinal connectivity revealed why the lower posterior visual field drives optimal optomotor responses in simZFish, explaining receptive field properties observed in real zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The simZFish head and body are modeled as seven segments connected by six hinge joints actuated by simulated servomotors, with dimensions and masses matching biophysical measurements of real zebrafish.
“In this simulated reality, the head and body of the simZFish are modeled as seven segments connected by six hinge joints actuated by simulated servomotors (Fig. S1B), with dimensions and masses matching biophysical measurements of real zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This cancellation reduces the network's ability to differentiate the direction of motion using local motion processing.
“This cancellation reduces the network’s ability to differentiate the direction of motion using local motion processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The sensory input, specifically rotational optic flow patterns in the lower visual field, dictates the architecture of the neural circuits.
“Conceptually, these results suggest that the sensory input—specifically, rotational optic flow patterns in the lower visual field— dictates the architecture of the neural circuits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The poor OMR performance from connecting all DSGCs occurred because perspective-distorted rotational direction information generated by stimuli with parallel gratings cancels each other out.
“Optic flow analysis of perceived visual input suggested that this occurred because the perspective-distorted rotational direction information generated by stimuli with parallel gratings cancels each other out (Fig. 4D, Supplementary Movie 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ZBot visual processing aligns with that of real zebrafish under these laboratory conditions.
“As expected, we observed comparable neuronal responses across ZBot, simZFish, and real zebrafish, suggesting that ZBot visual processing aligns with that of real zebrafish in these laboratory conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Real fish in natural rivers receive visual inputs that are richer than those that can be simulated, including differences in texture, turbidity, and lighting.
- Interpretationreasoning
The approach overcomes experimental limitations of real zebrafish by testing functionalities in virtual conditions that are difficult or impossible to test in vivo.
“This approach overcomes the experimental limitations of real zebrafish, testing functionalities in virtual conditions that are difficult or impossible to test in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Neural circuits, body morphology, and environmental context interact to shape neural circuits and adaptive behavior.
“Ultimately, our findings demonstrate how neural circuits, body morphology, and environmental context interact to shape neural circuits and adaptive behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Neural circuit design principles are influenced by embodiment.
“These results, supported by the prevalence of these response types in real zebrafish, uncover neural circuit design principles influenced by embodiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Physical attributes and connectivity influence neural activity across the network, behavior, and neural circuit design.
“Through controlled manipulations of visual input, lens properties, and retina-pretectal connectivity, we revealed how physical attributes and connectivity influence neural activity across the network, behavior, and, ultimately, neural circuit design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Manipulations of simZFish showed that embodiment influences neural architecture by giving access to otherwise hidden variables such as visual input from the fish's perspective.
“Manipulations to simZFish exposed how embodiment influences neural architecture by permitting access to otherwise hidden variables, such as visual input from the fish’s perspective, highlighting how sensory morphology shapes emergent neural functionality and how the physical properties of visual stimuli dictate optimal neural connectivity (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Rheotaxis can emerge from sensing local optic flow.
“Thus, this relatively complex behavior can emerge from sensing local optic flow, demonstrating that simZFish generalized to unseen visual environments, robustly and autonomously performing rheotaxis (36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
- Premisecitation
In underwater habitats, most contrast and chromatic content is found in the lower visual field.
“By systematically analyzing visual input through simZFish’s eyes (Fig. 4), we confirmed that optic flow processing is biased to the lower visual field, where most contrast and chromatic content is found in underwater habitats (54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Physical constraints of the underwater environment and constraints imposed by embodiment dictate the design of optimal neural architecture in both real fish and artificial agents.
“Thus, the physical constraints of the underwater environment, as well as those imposed by embodiment, dictate the design of the optimal neural architecture in both real fish and these artificial agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The physical properties of visual stimuli dictate optimal neural connectivity.
“Manipulations to simZFish exposed how embodiment influences neural architecture by permitting access to otherwise hidden variables, such as visual input from the fish’s perspective, highlighting how sensory morphology shapes emergent neural functionality and how the physical properties of visual stimuli dictate optimal neural connectivity (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The greater distance per bout of ZBot compared with real zebrafish is likely caused by differences in fluid dynamics.
“ZBot traveled twice as far per bout as the real zebrafish, likely due to differences in fluid dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The sensory-driven OMR circuit helps the physical ZBot reorient its body against the flow to compensate for downstream drift.
“Together, these results demonstrate that our sensory-driven OMR circuit aids the physical ZBot to reorient its body against the flow to compensate for being dragged downriver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sensory morphology shapes emergent neural functionality.
“Manipulations to simZFish exposed how embodiment influences neural architecture by permitting access to otherwise hidden variables, such as visual input from the fish’s perspective, highlighting how sensory morphology shapes emergent neural functionality and how the physical properties of visual stimuli dictate optimal neural connectivity (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Artificial OMR circuits in fish-like simulated and physical bodies are useful for compensating for downstream drift.
“Our findings demonstrate the utility of artificial OMR circuits in fish-like simulated and physical bodies for compensating for downstream drift (Fig. 3G, 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The design principles of brain sensorimotor systems cannot be solved with models that are decoupled from the body and sensory feedback.
“Solving the design principles of brain sensorimotor systems remains a challenge that cannot be solved with models decoupled from the body and sensory feedback (5, 61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] source
- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 51
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationsimZFish1.0 successfully replicates key behavioral aspects of zebrafish OMR, partly due to its tuning to match behaviors for limited orthogonal stimuli.
“The first iteration, simZFish1.0, successfully replicates key behavioral aspects of zebrafish OMR, partly due to its tuning to match behaviors for limited orthogonal stimuli (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Results section, “Identifying Critical Dimensions of Functional Connectivity” (page unavailable), says the circuit-model architecture could accurately predict behavioral data, and the Methods describe fitting predictions to responses under ten stimulus conditions. Our copy does not identify that model as simZFish1.0 or establish that its success was partly due to tuning on limited orthogonal stimuli. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlternative neural circuits favoring lower anterior DSGC connectivity could be equally effective but would require downstream visuomotor circuits different from those experimentally observed.
“Although it is plausible that alternative neural circuits favoring lower anterior DSGCs connectivity could be equally effective, they would require downstream visuomotor circuits different from those experimentally observed (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Results section, “Identifying Critical Dimensions of Functional Connectivity” (page unavailable), says that multiple sets of connections can yield similar behavioral predictions, supporting the possibility of equally effective alternatives. It does not identify alternatives favoring lower anterior DSGC connectivity or say that they would require downstream visuomotor circuits different from those experimentally observed. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe findings align well with biological studies showing that the OMR is most strongly evoked by motion in the lower posterior visual field, matching real pretectal receptive fields.
“Notably, our findings align well with biological studies, which show that the OMR is most strongly evoked by motion in the lower posterior visual field (55), matching real pretectal receptive fields (31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] source
The paper reports anisotropic color-processing circuits in the lower and outward visual field (Large-Scale Functional Anisotropies of the Inner Retina Match Natural Spectral Statistics, p. 10), but does not establish where motion most strongly evokes the OMR. Searches for optomotor responses and lower-posterior motion found no passage addressing that claim. The pretectal receptive-field statement has a separate citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
The citation to this paper is attached to the claim about pretectal receptive fields, not the separate claim about where motion most strongly evokes the OMR. The AF5 results (p. 9) show pretectal direction-selective responses to stimuli presented from the side and from below, but do not establish receptive fields preferentially covering the lower posterior visual field. The paper therefore supports pretectal motion sensitivity, not the asserted spatial match. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationlPTs collectively control movement direction by activating neurons of the anterior hindbrain, which suppresses behavioral oscillation via reciprocal inhibition.
“As suggested by our previous modeling, lPTs collectively control the movement direction by activating neurons of the anterior hindbrain (aHB) (25, 30), which suppresses behavioral oscillation via reciprocal inhibition (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] source
- cites [30] source
The ‘Motor related’ section maps neurons associated with locomotion, and the ‘Motor-off related’ section suggests that some dorsal-hindbrain neurons might inhibit motor output. Neither establishes that lPTs activate anterior-hindbrain neurons to control movement direction. A search for lPTs and reciprocal inhibition found no passage addressing that proposed circuit; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent models of zebrafish visuomotor transformations rely on correlation-based neural activity, lack realistic retina or motor representations, omit neural connectivity manipulation, and exclude closed-loop observations of neural activation during behavior.
“Current models of zebrafish visuomotor transformations rely on correlation-based neural activity, lack realistic representations of the retina or motor systems (25, 29), omit the ability to manipulate neural connectivity, and exclude closed-loop observations of neural activation during behavior, which limits the integrative investigation of the system within its sensory and physical environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] source
The Discussion says the model ignores processing in the retina and spinal cord, and the Methods describe correlation-based neural activity maps. But the Results report both an experimental commissure ablation and its simulation in the model, so the claim that connectivity cannot be manipulated is not supported. The Introduction mentions closed-loop stimulus delivery, while the Methods describe neural imaging in restrained, paralyzed fish; these passages do not establish closed-loop neural observations during behavior. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] source
The Online methods (Algorithmic modeling; Anterior hindbrain network modeling, pages unavailable) describe simplified sensory inputs and swim-bout outputs, consistent with the claim that the model lacks realistic retina and motor-system representations. But the same methods say the authors varied connectivity weights and modeled visual feedback. The Two-photon calcium imaging methods also describe simultaneous neural imaging and behavioral readout with stimulus changes triggered by detected bouts, so the broader claims of omitted connectivity manipulation and excluded closed-loop observations are not supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe simZFish platform generates a faithful virtual sensory environment with fluid dynamics, drag, and viscous forces, resulting in realistic locomotion behaviors.
“The simZFish platform generates a faithful virtual sensory environment, complete with fluid dynamics, modeling drag, and viscous forces (Fig. S1C), resulting in realistic locomotion behaviors (Fig. S1D, E)(40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
The Methods section (page unavailable) describes a zebrafish swimming simulation that models fluid flow and viscous forces. The Results section (page unavailable) reports that its simulated body shapes matched recorded fish and could imitate self-propelled swimming. The paper does not identify this model as simZFish or describe a virtual sensory environment, so it does not support those parts of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReal larval zebrafish experience intermediate Reynolds numbers of 10-1000 and are influenced by both viscous and pressure drag.
“ZBot operates in a turbulent regime, with a higher Reynolds number (1.35*105, at 0.15 m/s), experiencing lower viscous drag than the real larval zebrafish, which experience intermediate Reynolds numbers: 10–1000 (58) and are influenced by both viscous and pressure drag (59).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) mentions fish only in a discussion of optokinetic eye movements. Searches for larval zebrafish Reynolds numbers and for viscous and pressure drag found no passage in our copy addressing the hydrodynamic claim. In the citing sentence, the Reynolds-number range is attached to citation 58, while the drag claim is attached to this source as citation 59. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [59] source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationInvestigating ZBot's visual input shows the complexity of natural visual input, including turbidity, glare, and Snell's window, which limits the underwater field of view due to surface refraction.
“Investigating the visual input of the ZBot demonstrates the complexity of natural visual input, including turbidity, glare, and Snell’s window, which limits the field of view underwater due to surface refraction (80).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] source
The paper’s discussion of Figure 1 says that refraction at an air–water interface compresses the apparent horizon into a 97.2° Snell window for a fish in an experimental arena. It does not investigate ZBot’s natural visual input or address turbidity and glare, so those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationZBot operates in a turbulent regime with a Reynolds number of 1.35×10^5 at 0.15 m/s and experiences lower viscous drag than real larval zebrafish.
“ZBot operates in a turbulent regime, with a higher Reynolds number (1.35*105, at 0.15 m/s), experiencing lower viscous drag than the real larval zebrafish, which experience intermediate Reynolds numbers: 10–1000 (58) and are influenced by both viscous and pressure drag (59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] source
The Introduction discusses the optokinetic reflex, and the Results and Methods passages concern retinal activity and eye movements in mice; no page numbers are provided. Searches for ZBot, larval zebrafish, Reynolds number, and viscous or pressure drag found no passage addressing the attributed fluid-dynamics claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [59] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationsimZFish and ZBot lack motor adaptation, such as adjusting speed to compensate for faster river flow, and are limited by their maximal swimming speed and bout frequency.
“As simZFish and ZBot currently lack any ability for motor adaptation (60), such as adjusting their speed to compensate for faster river flow, they are limited by their maximal swimming speed and bout frequency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] source
The Abstract and Burst and coast behavior section examine swimming and coasting in living zebrafish larvae, while Two ways to maximize coast distance discusses physical limits on fish speed. Our copy does not address simZFish or ZBot, whether they can adapt their swimming to river flow, or limits on their bout frequency (searched: model names, motor adaptation, river flow, and bout frequency). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSystematically altering connectivity between DSGCs and ePTs revealed that the lower posterior visual field is most effective, as only this connectivity strongly activated the downstream circuit to drive increased bout frequency.
“Systematically altering the connectivity between DSGCs and ePTs revealed that the lower posterior visual field is most effective, as only this connectivity strongly activated the downstream circuit to drive increased bout frequency (Fig. S6E, F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datasimZFish and zebrafish respond to converging motion to both eyes with increased bout frequency, while diverging motion decreases bout frequency below spontaneous levels.
“Comparing average histograms of bout angle distributions (Fig. 3E), simZFish and zebrafish respond to converging motion to both eyes, with increased bout frequency, while diverging motion decreases bout frequency below spontaneous levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAs predicted from optical principles, focal length affected the perceived visual projection onto the simulated retina, with a wider field of view corresponding to shorter focal lengths.
“As predicted from optical principles, the focal length affected the perceived visual projection onto the simulated retina, with a wider field of view corresponding to shorter focal lengths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPresenting these new stimuli to real zebrafish revealed substantial behavioral differences, suggesting mismatches between the real and simulated neural architectures.
“Presenting these new stimuli to real zebrafish (Fig. 5C, middle), we observed substantial behavioral differences (Fig. S7A, B), suggesting mismatches between the real and simulated neural architectures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNarrower angle lenses increase the optic flow magnitude of gratings moving orthogonally to the image plane of the camera or eye but have minimal effect on the optic flow magnitude of parallel stimuli.
“Narrower angle lenses increase the optic flow magnitude of gratings moving orthogonally to the image plane of the camera or eye but have minimal effect on the optic flow magnitude of parallel stimuli (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGuided by simZFish predictions, neurons with previously undiscovered response profiles were identified through calcium imaging in live zebrafish brains and incorporated, leading to improved performance.
“Guided by simZFish predictions, we also identified neurons with previously undiscovered response profiles through calcium imaging in live zebrafish brains and incorporated these newly discovered neural subtypes, leading to improved performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome backward-selective neurons were suppressed by forward motion to the opposite eye, indicating a neural mechanism that reduces turning.
“Mirroring the behavior, we discovered some backward-selective neurons were suppressed by forward motion to the opposite eye, indicating a neural mechanism that reduces turning (Fig. S8A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningDuring early network tuning, connecting all DSGCs led to poor OMR performance, with no increased bout frequency in response to forward motion.
“During early network tuning, we found that connecting all DSGCs led to poor OMR performance, with no increased bout frequency in response to forward motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn real zebrafish, monocular backward motion induced turning in the direction of the stimulated eye, indicating that the brain interprets this as a turning stimulus despite the absence of formal directional information.
“However, in real zebrafish, monocular backward (xB, Bx) induced turning in the direction of the stimulated eye, indicating that the brain interprets this as a turning stimulus despite the absence of formal directional information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn different flow velocities, simZFish maintains its position for speeds up to 0.3 cm/s, overcompensating for slower flow velocities.
“In different flow velocities, simZFish maintains its position for speeds up to 0.3 cm/s, overcompensating for slower flow velocities (Fig. 3H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReal zebrafish and simZFish1.0 strongly increased bout frequency to binocular forward motion, and monocular forward motion triggered about 50% of the bout rate.
“As expected, real zebrafish and simZFish1.0 strongly increased bout frequency to binocular forward motion (FF, Fig. S7C–E), and monocular forward motion (xF, Fx) triggered ~50% of the bout rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese behavioral results reveal complex interactions across eyes and motion directions in real zebrafish, which were not identified before and were absent from simZFish1.0.
“These behavioral results reveal complex interactions across eyes and motion directions in real zebrafish, which were not identified before and, therefore, absent from simZFish1.0 (Fig. S7G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn simZFish1.0, these stimuli strongly increased turning to the opposite side, predicting discrepancies in their neural architecture.
“In simZFish1.0, these stimuli strongly increased turning to the opposite side, predicting discrepancies in their neural architecture (Fig. S7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBinocular leftward motion increased leftward bout frequency (0.027 Hz at −46°), increased biased forward bouts (0.089 Hz at −4°), and suppressed turns in the opposite direction (0.012 Hz at 34°).
“Binocular leftward motion increased leftward bout frequency (0.027 Hz, at −46°), increased biased forward bouts (0.089 Hz, at −4°), and suppressed turns in the opposite direction (0.012 Hz, at 34°).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe physical ZBot validated these neural algorithms in the wild and helped stabilize its position in challenging natural environments with fast-flowing, turbid water.
“The physical ZBot further validated these neural algorithms in the wild, contributing to stabilizing its position in challenging, natural environments with fast-flowing, turbid water conditions (Fig. 6), reinforcing its potential for studying sensorimotor systems in real-world environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn a stationary lake, ZBot showed swimming kinematics similar to real larval zebrafish, with realistic bout and glide behavior, a preset bout frequency of 0.09 Hz, and tail-beating frequencies of 1.5 Hz.
“Despite the size differences, ZBot exhibited swimming kinematics like real larval zebrafish, demonstrating realistic bout and glide behavior with preset bout (0.09 Hz), and tail-beating frequencies (1.5 Hz).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Real fish in natural rivers receive visual inputs that are richer than those that can be simulated, including differences in texture, turbidity, and lighting.
- Rests on an assumption: The larger-scale ZBot design reasonably balances approximating larval zebrafish morphology with the technical requirements of a moving fish-like robot.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeurons most critical for turning split into forward and backward selective types, with additional neurons responding to both and showing suppression to the contralateral eye.
“Notably, neurons most critical for turning (oB, B, Mm, S), split into forward and backward selective types, with additional neurons responding to both and showing suppression to the contralateral eye (Supplementary Movie 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datasimZFish accurately reproduces body-water interactions, neural circuits, and visual environments.
“By synthesizing empirical neurobiological data into a physics-based simulator, we created simZFish, which accurately reproduces body-water interactions, neural circuits, and visual environments (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn expanded set of translational stimuli uncovered discrepancies between simZFish and real behavior and directly predicted functional neural subtypes with specific stimulus preferences and circuit layouts.
“Crucially, these insights prompted us to use an expanded set of translational stimuli, uncovering discrepancies between the simZFish and real behavior, which directly predicted functional neural subtypes with specific stimulus preferences and circuit layouts (Fig. 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningsimZFish provides full control over sensory input and artificial neurons during free locomotion, allowing manipulation of neuronal properties and physical attributes such as lens characteristics or body proportions.
“simZFish provides full control over sensory input and artificial neurons during free locomotion, offering virtually unlimited opportunities to manipulate neuronal properties and physical attributes like lens characteristics or body proportions (Supplementary Discussion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNatural visual input was sufficient to orient ZBot upstream, with directed turn bouts adjusting heading and increased forward bout frequency when aligned with optic flow.
“The remotely recorded neural activity demonstrates that the natural visual input is sufficient to orient ZBot upstream, adjusting heading direction with directed turn bouts and increasing forward bout frequency when aligned with the direction of optic flow (Fig. 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn ZBot camera recordings, even in clear water, visual features above a certain elevation tend to be blurred and saturated by light, which emphasizes the importance of lower visual fields.
“Recordings of the ZBot’s cameras, even in clear waters, emphasized the importance of lower visual fields, as visual features above a certain elevation tend to be blurred and saturated by light (Fig. 6C, S10A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese forward and backward-preferring subtypes were prevalent across all zebrafish, highlighting their importance in motion processing.
“These forward and backward-preferring subtypes were prevalent across all zebrafish, highlighting their importance in motion processing (Fig. S8C–E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEach ZBot tail-beating bout phase lasted about 5 seconds and completed five tail-beating cycles.
“Each tail-beating bout phase lasted ~5 s, completing five tail-beating cycles (Fig. S9G–H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLens morphology directly affects neural activation and sensory-driven behavior in identical neural networks.
“Thus, lens morphology directly affects neural activation and sensory-driven behavior in identical neural networks (Fig. S6C, D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown datasimZFish's circuits contribute to maintaining position in moving waters with visual input alone, effectively performing rheotaxis autonomously.
“These simulations show that simZFish’s circuits contribute to maintaining position in moving waters with visual input alone, effectively performing rheotaxis autonomously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf evolutionary pressure favors minimizing neural connections, this configuration provides an effective solution, maximizing optic flow information for downstream neural circuits while minimizing wiring and computational load.
“If evolutionary pressure favors minimizing neural connections, this configuration provides an effective solution, maximizing optic flow information for downstream neural circuits while minimizing wiring and computational load.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Evolutionary pressure favors minimizing the number of neural connections.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationNeural connectivity and ethologically relevant sensory input not only affect neural activity and resulting behavior but might even dictate neural architecture itself.
“Practically, these results demonstrate that neural connectivity and ethologically relevant sensory input not only affect neural activity and resulting behavior but might even dictate neural architecture itself (57).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn real zebrafish, all DSGCs project contralaterally, activating neurons in the early pretectum.
“As in real zebrafish (32), all DSGCs project contralaterally, activating neurons in the early pretectum (ePTs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results underscore how embodiment shapes neural circuits and how mechanisms identified in idealized laboratory conditions can be implemented to lead to adaptive behaviors in the real world.
“Together, our results underscore how embodiment shapes neural circuits and how mechanisms identified in idealized laboratory conditions can be implemented to lead to adaptive behaviors in the real world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese results validate the circuit functionality and provide evidence for OMR's purpose as a sensory-guided stabilization mechanism.
“Importantly, these results not only validate the circuit functionality but also provide evidence for OMR’s purpose as a sensory-guided stabilization mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationsimZFish generalized to unseen visual environments and performed rheotaxis robustly and autonomously.
“Thus, this relatively complex behavior can emerge from sensing local optic flow, demonstrating that simZFish generalized to unseen visual environments, robustly and autonomously performing rheotaxis (36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimulations are cost-effective and allow systematic testing of modifications to the body or neural connectivity.
“In contrast, simulations are cost-effective and allow for systematic testing of body or neural connectivity modifications (6, 61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] source
- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIncorporating these neurons provided a valuable strategy for reverse-engineering visuomotor systems and uncovered previously overlooked, behaviorally relevant neural computations.
“Incorporating these neurons into simZFish improved behavioral accuracy and provided a valuable strategy for reverse-engineering visuomotor systems, uncovering previously overlooked, behaviorally relevant neural computations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFor all trials, ZBot was released with the same initial upstream heading direction of 0°.
“For all trials, ZBot was released with the same initial upstream heading direction (0°).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAt least five repetitions of the 16 binocular and monocular orthogonal and parallel moving stimuli were presented.
“At least five repetitions of the 16 binocular and monocular orthogonal and parallel moving stimuli were presented with a black bar underneath the fish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll river experiments were conducted within one hour on the same day to ensure comparable visibility and current velocity.
“As the water flow in natural rivers varies rapidly, we conducted all experiments within one hour on the same day to ensure comparable visibility and current velocity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis iterative process enhanced the simulated neural circuit's accuracy and realism, offering important insights into circuit function.
“This iterative process enhanced the simulated neural circuit’s accuracy and realism, offering important insights into circuit function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningsimZFish served as a predictive framework that suggested new behavioral and neural experiments and led to identification of neural characteristics critical for biorealistic OMR behaviors.
“Ultimately, simZFish served as a predictive framework that suggested novel behavioral and neural experiments, leading to the identification of neural characteristics critical for biorealistic OMR behaviors (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll live zebrafish experiments were approved by Duke University School of Medicine's animal care and use program (IACUC, Protocol Registry #A058-24-03).
“All live zebrafish experiments were approved by Duke University School of Medicine’s animal care and use program (IACUC, Protocol Registry #A058-24-03).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCurrent stabilization methods in floating robots such as quadcopters and underwater vehicles often use multiple cameras pointing downward.
“The current methods for stabilization in floating robots, such as quadcopters and underwater vehicles often use multiple cameras pointing downward (81).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOf 29 trials, 14 were included in the final analysis; 16 were excluded because of collisions with the river edge (4), swimming upstream out of the drone camera view (3), and Wi-Fi communication failure (6).
“Of 29 trials, we included 14 trials in the final analysis because the other 16 trials were corrupted due to collisions with the river edge (4 trials), swimming upstream out of the drone camera view (3 trials), and failure of Wi-Fi communication (6 trials).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenZBot is unique in using a biorealistic, neurobiologically derived artificial neural architecture.
“Nonetheless, ZBot is unique in using a biorealistic, neurobiologically derived artificial neural architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningRiver experiments were conducted only if it had not rained in the past five days, to avoid muddy water decreasing visibility.
“As rain muddied the water, decreasing visibility, experiments were only conducted if it had not rained in the past five days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe zebrafish-inspired artificial neural architecture with just two laterally positioned eyes offers a bio-inspired strategy for stabilizing fish-like robots in fluid flows and reduces cost and weight.
“Our zebrafish-inspired artificial neural architecture, featuring just two laterally positioned eyes, offers a bio-inspired strategy for stabilizing fish-like robots in fluid flows, thereby reducing cost and weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenZebrafish were removed from further analysis if there were imaging artifacts or if the pretectal population response did not show consistent activation by whole-field visual stimuli.
“We removed zebrafish from further analysis if there were imaging artifacts or if the population response in the pretectum did not show consistent activation by whole-field visual stimuli.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenZebrafish were removed from further analysis if there were tracking artifacts or if the fish did not perform at least one trial of each visual stimulus repetition.
“We removed zebrafish from further analysis if there were tracking artifacts or the fish did not perform at least one trial of each visual stimulus repetition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFor all zebrafish behavior, the study met or exceeded the field's standard for number of experimental animals (>16) and trial repetitions (>10, >25 s trial length); for imaging studies (>7 animals), stimulus repetitions (>5).
“For all zebrafish behavior, we met or exceeded the field’s standard for the number of experimental animals (>16) and trial repetitions (>10, >25 s trial length); for imaging studies (> 7 animals), stimulus repetitions (>5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBecause viscous drag exceeds pressure drag during gliding, larval zebrafish experience higher drag while gliding and therefore have proportionally shorter gliding distances than ZBot.
“Since viscous drag is higher than pressure drag during the gliding phase, the comparatively small body of larval zebrafish experiences higher drag while gliding (59), resulting in proportionally shorter gliding distances compared to the ZBot (Fig. S9I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
The authors state this as an assumption.
To grasp how neural circuits work, one must test the whole brain-body system in settings that resemble the real world.
“Understanding of their function requires integrative brain-body testing in realistic contexts.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
To model real animals' neural dynamics accurately, one must validate sensorimotor loops in complex physical environments and account for nuanced behavioral outcomes.
“However, accurate modeling of neural dynamics observed in real animals requires validation of sensorimotor loops within the complexities of the physical world and associated nuanced behavioral consequences.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Evolutionary pressure favors minimizing the number of neural connections.
“If evolutionary pressure favors minimizing neural connections, this configuration provides an effective solution, maximizing optic flow information for downstream neural circuits while minimizing wiring and computational load.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real fish in natural rivers receive visual inputs that are richer than those that can be simulated, including differences in texture, turbidity, and lighting.
“For instance, real fish in natural rivers experience far richer visual inputs than we can simulate, including variations in texture, turbidity, and lighting.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real-world fluid dynamics pose challenges such as turbulence and irregular flow patterns.
“Real-world fluid dynamics present challenges, such as turbulences and irregular flow patterns.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current technology does not allow construction of robots as small as the larval zebrafish body while including the necessary hardware.
“Although the ZBot would ideally replicate the small size (~4 mm) of the larval zebrafish body, current technology does not permit the construction of such small robots with the required hardware (cameras, controller, motors, electronic boards, batteries, waterproofing, etc.).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The larger-scale ZBot design reasonably balances approximating larval zebrafish morphology with the technical requirements of a moving fish-like robot.
“Thus, our larger-scale ZBot (~ 80 cm) balances key features of real larval zebrafish with technological requirements (Fig. S9A).”
“ZBot’s length (~80 cm) and weight (2.7 kg) represent reasonable trade-offs between approximating real larval zebrafish morphological features and satisfying technical requirements to equip a moving fish-like robot with cameras, electronic boards, batteries, motors, and waterproofing.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Corruption subcategories do not add to the stated total
MajorThe listed reasons for excluding trials are 4 collisions, 3 out of view, and 6 Wi-Fi failures. These add to 13, not the stated 16 corrupted trials.
Reported 16 · recomputed 13
“the other 16 trials were corrupted due to collisions with the river edge (4 trials), swimming upstream out of the drone camera view (3 trials), and failure of Wi-Fi communication (6 trials).”
Included and excluded ZBot trials do not sum to total trials
MajorThe methods state that 29 trials were run, 14 were included, and the other 16 were corrupted. But 14 plus 16 equals 30, not 29, so the trial accounting is internally inconsistent.
Reported 29 · recomputed 30
“Of 29 trials, we included 14 trials in the final analysis because the other 16 trials were corrupted due to collisions with the river edge (4 trials), swimming upstream out of the drone camera view (3 trials), and failure of Wi-Fi communication (6 trials).”
Cites
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · see citing works
Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity
Chen, T.-W., Wardill, T. J., Sun, Y., Pulver, S. R., Renninger, S. L., Baohan, A., Schreiter, E. R., Kerr, R. A., Orger, M. B., Jayaraman, V., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12354 · Cited by 6,474 · see citing works
The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina.
Barlow, H. B., & Levick, W. R. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007638 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity
Stringer, C., Pachitariu, M., Steinmetz, N., Reddy, C. B., Carandini, M., & Harris, K. D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav7893 · Cited by 1,510 · see citing works
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis
White, R. M., Sessa, A., Burke, C., Bowman, T., LeBlanc, J., Ceol, C., Bourque, C., Dovey, M., Goessling, W., Burns, C. E., et al. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy
Ahrens, M. B., Orger, M. B., Robson, D. N., Li, J. M., & Keller, P. J. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2434 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Cyberbotics Ltd. Webots <sup>™</sup> : Professional Mobile Robot Simulation
Michel, O. (2004) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/5618 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model
Ijspeert, A. J., Crespi, A., Ryczko, D., & Cabelguen, J.-M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138353 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Self-citationLucas/Kanade Meets Horn/Schunck: Combining Local and Global Optic Flow Methods
Bruhn, A., Weickert, J., & Schnörr, C. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000045324.43199.43 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Suite2p: beyond 10,000 neurons with standard two-photon microscopyPreprint
Pachitariu, M., Stringer, C., Dipoppa, M., Schröder, S., Rossi, L. F., Dalgleish, H. W. P., Carandini, M., & Harris, K. D. (2016) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/061507 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.017574 · Cited by 1,056 · see citing works
NoRMCorre: An online algorithm for piecewise rigid motion correction of calcium imaging data
Pnevmatikakis, E. A., & Giovannucci, A. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.07.031 · Cited by 1,038 · see citing works
How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence
Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. (2006) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3585.001.0001 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
The motor infrastructure: from ion channels to neuronal networks
Grillner, S. E. (2003) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1137 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Brain-wide neuronal dynamics during motor adaptation in zebrafish
Ahrens, M. B., Li, J. M., Orger, M. B., Robson, D. N., Schier, A. F., Engert, F., & Portugues, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11057 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
King, R. D., Rowland, J., Oliver, S. G., Young, M., Aubrey, W., Byrne, E., Liakata, M., Markham, M., Pir, P., Soldatova, L. N., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165620 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Geyer, H., & Herr, H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2010.2047592 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
The Development of Vision in the Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
Easter, S. S., & Nicola, G. N. (1996) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.1996.0335 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Biorobotics: Using robots to emulate and investigate agile locomotion
Ijspeert, A. J. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254486 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Self-citationOptogenetic dissection of a behavioural module in the vertebrate spinal cord
Wyart, C., Bene, F. D., Warp, E., Scott, E. K., Trauner, D., Baier, H., & Isacoff, E. Y. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08323 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion
Kim, I.-J., Zhang, Y., Yamagata, M., Meister, M., & Sanes, J. R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06739 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Whole-brain serial-section electron microscopy in larval zebrafish
Hildebrand, D. G. C., Cicconet, M., Torres, R., Choi, W., Quan, T. M., Moon, J., Wetzel, A. W., Champion, A. S., Graham, B. J., Randlett, O., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22356 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
An Anatomically Constrained Model for Path Integration in the Bee Brain
Stone, T., Webb, B., Adden, A., Weddig, N. B., Honkanen, A., Templin, R., Wcislo, W., Scimeca, L., Warrant, E., & Heinze, S. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.052 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Huberman, A. D., Wei, W., Elstrott, J., Stafford, B. K., Feller, M. B., & Barres, B. A. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.014 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?
Webb, B. H. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000127 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain
Pack, C. C., & Born, R. T. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35059085 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion
LAUDER, G. V., Anderson, E. J., Tangorra, J. L., & Madden, P. G. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.000265 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Neural circuits underlying visually evoked escapes in larval zebrafish
Dunn, T. W., Gebhardt, C., Naumann, E. A., Riegler, C., Ahrens, M. B., Engert, F., & Del Bene, F. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.021 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species
Baden, T., Euler, T., & Berens, P. (2019) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0242-1 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Prey capture behavior evoked by simple visual stimuli in larval zebrafish
Bianco, I. H., Kampff, A. R., & Engert, F. (2011) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00101 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function
Vaney, D. I., Sivyer, B., & Taylor, W. R. (2012) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3165 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
From Whole-Brain Data to Functional Circuit Models: The Zebrafish Optomotor Response
Naumann, E. A., Fitzgerald, J. E., Dunn, T. W., Rihel, J., Sompolinsky, H., & Engert, F. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.019 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping brain activity at scale with cluster computing
Freeman, J., Vladimirov, N., Kawashima, T., Mu, Y., Sofroniew, N. J., Bennett, D. V., Rosen, J., Yang, C.-T., Looger, L. L., & Ahrens, M. B. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3041 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Architecture, Function, and Assembly of the Mouse Visual System
Seabrook, T. A., Burbridge, T. J., Crair, M. C., & Huberman, A. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033842 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Srinivasan, M. V. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2010 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
A combined neuronal and mechanical model of fish swimming
Ekeberg, Ö. (1993) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00199436 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
A combined neuronal and mechanical model of fish swimming
Ekeberg, Ö. (1993) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf01185408 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Control of visually guided behavior by distinct populations of spinal projection neurons
Orger, M. B., Kampff, A. R., Severi, K. E., Bollmann, J. H., & Engert, F. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2048 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A Cellular-Resolution Atlas of the Larval Zebrafish Brain
Kunst, M., Laurell, E., Mokayes, N., Kramer, A., Kubo, F., Fernandes, A. M., Förster, D., Maschio, M. D., & Baier, H. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.034 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Direction-Selective Units in Rabbit Retina: Distribution of Preferred Directions
Oyster, C. W., & Barlow, H. B. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.155.3764.841 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Early‐eye morphogenesis in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio
Schmitt, E. A., & Dowling, J. E. (1994) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903440404 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Burrill, J. D., & Easter, S. S. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903460410 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Structure of the Zebrafish Locomotor Repertoire Revealed with Unsupervised Behavioral Clustering
Marques, J. C., Lackner, S., Félix, R., & Orger, M. B. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.002 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Internal state dynamics shape brainwide activity and foraging behaviour
Marques, J. C., Li, M., Schaak, D., Robson, D. N., & Li, J. M. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1858-z · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Neural control and modulation of swimming speed in the larval zebrafish
Severi, K. E., Portugues, R., Marques, J. C., O’Malley, D. M., Orger, M. B., & Engert, F. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.032 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Behavioral genetic approaches to visual system development and function in zebrafish
Neuhauss, S. C. F. (2002) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10165 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Modelling of intersegmental coordination in the lamprey central pattern generator for locomotion
Cohen, A. H., Ermentrout, B., Kiemel, T., Kopell, N., Sigvardt, K. A., & Williams, T. L. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90006-t · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Vortex phase matching as a strategy for schooling in robots and in fish
Li, L., Nagy, M., Graving, J. M., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Xie, G., & Couzin, I. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19086-0 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Zebrafish Differentially Process Color across Visual Space to Match Natural Scenes
Zimmermann, M. J. Y., Nevala, N. E., Yoshimatsu, T., Osorio, D., Nilsson, D.-E., Berens, P., & Baden, T. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.075 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Visuomotor Transformations Underlying Hunting Behavior in Zebrafish
Bianco, I. H., & Engert, F. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.042 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Robles, E., Laurell, E., & Baier, H. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.080 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
A novel mechanism for mechanosensory-based rheotaxis in larval zebrafish
Oteiza, P., Odstrcil, I., Lauder, G., Portugues, R., & Engert, F. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23014 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Towards Robot Scientists for autonomous scientific discovery
Sparkes, A., Aubrey, W., Byrne, E., Clare, A. J., Khan, M. N. A., Liakata, M., Markham, M., Rowland, J. J., Soldatova, L., Whelan, K. E., et al. (2010) · Automated Experimentation · doi:10.1186/1759-4499-2-1 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
A Bio-Inspired Flying Robot Sheds Light on Insect Piloting Abilities
Franceschini, N. H., Ruffier, F., & Serres, J. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.032 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Descending Control of Swim Posture by a Midbrain Nucleus in Zebrafish
Thiele, T. R., Donovan, J. C., & Baier, H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.018 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Kubo, F., Hablitzel, B., Dal Maschio, M., Driever, W., Baier, H., & Arrenberg, A. B. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.043 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Wu, F.-Y., Tian, R.-Y., Shi, Y., Xu, Z.-Q., Liu, J.-Y., Huang, J., Xue, F.-F., Liu, B.-Y., & Liu, G. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-04154-6 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
A retinal code for motion along the gravitational and body axes
Sabbah, S., Gemmer, J. A., Bhatia-Lin, A., Manoff, G., Castro, G. D. O., Siegel, J. K., Jeffery, N. S., & Berson, D. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22818 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant visual-motion information in the fly
Egelhaaf, M. (2002) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02063-5 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
dal Maschio, M., Donovan, J. C., Helmbrecht, T. O., & Baier, H. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.034 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Neural circuits for evidence accumulation and decision making in larval zebrafish
Bahl, A., & Engert, F. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0534-9 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Yonehara, K., Ishikane, H., Sakuta, H., Shintani, T., Nakamura-Yonehara, K., Kamiji, N. L., Usui, S., & Noda, M. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004320 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Parametric Functional Maps of Visual Inputs to the Tectum
Nikolaou, N., Lowe, A., Walker, A., Abbas, F. H., Hunter, P. R., Thompson, I. D., & Meyer, M. P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.040 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Cellular Mechanisms for Direction Selectivity in the Retina
Demb, J. B. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.001 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Divergent stereo in autonomous navigation: From bees to robots
Santos-Victor, J., Sandini, G., Curotto, F., et al. (1995) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf01418981 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation
Song, S., Kidziński, Ł., Peng, X. B., Ong, C. F., Hicks, J. L., Levine, S., Atkeson, C. G., & Delp, S. L. (2021) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00919-y · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Emergence of robust self-organized undulatory swimming based on local hydrodynamic force sensing
Thandiackal, R., Melo, K., Paez, L., Herault, J., Kano, T., Akiyama, K., Boyer, F., Ryczko, D., Ishiguro, A., & Ijspeert, A. J. (2021) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abf6354 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationFly visual course control: behaviour, algorithms and circuits
Borst, A. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3799 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
OFF ganglion cells cannot drive the optokinetic reflex in zebrafish
Emran, F., Rihel, J., Adolph, A. R., Wong, K. Y., Kraves, S., & Dowling, J. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709337104 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flow patterns of larval fish: undulatory swimming in the intermediate flow regime
Müller, U. K., van den Boogaart, J. G. M., & van Leeuwen, J. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.005629 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Flow-relative control of an underwater robot
Salumäe, T., & Kruusmaa, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2012.0671 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Spinal projection neurons control turning behaviors in zebrafish
Huang, K.-H., Ahrens, M. B., Dunn, T. W., & Engert, F. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.044 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Fetcho, J. R., & McLean, D. L. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05539.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Neural Circuit to Integrate Opposing Motions in the Visual Field
Mauss, A. S., Pankova, K., Arenz, A., Nern, A., Rubin, G. M., & Borst, A. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.035 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Giolli, R. A., Blanks, R. H. I., & Torigoe, Y. (1984) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902270208 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Sefati, S., Neveln, I. D., Roth, E., Mitchell, T. R. T., Snyder, J. B., MacIver, M. A., Fortune, E. S., & Cowan, N. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309300110 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Connectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system
Lappalainen, J. K., Tschopp, F. D., Prakhya, S., McGill, M., Nern, A., Shinomiya, K., Takemura, S.-Y., Gruntman, E., Macke, J. H., & Turaga, S. C. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Cerebellar Neurodynamics Predict Decision Timing and Outcome on the Single-Trial Level
Lin, Q., Manley, J., Helmreich, M., Schlumm, F., Li, J. M., Robson, D. N., Engert, F., Schier, A., Nöbauer, T., & Vaziri, A. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.018 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Precise Lamination of Retinal Axons Generates Multiple Parallel Input Pathways in the Tectum
Robles, E., Filosa, A., & Baier, H. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4990-12.2013 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The mechanical scaling of coasting in zebrafish ( Danio rerio )
McHenry, M. J., & LAUDER, G. V. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01642 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Yonehara, K., Shintani, T., Suzuki, R., Sakuta, H., Takeuchi, Y., Nakamura-Yonehara, K., & Noda, M. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001533 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Vision-Based Target Tracking and Collision Avoidance for Two Autonomous Robotic Fish
Hu, Y., Zhao, W. T., & Wang, L. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2009.2014675 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Štih, V., Petrucco, L., Kist, A. M., & Portugues, R. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006699 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The neuromechanics of animal locomotion: From biology to robotics and back
Ramdya, P., & Ijspeert, A. J. (2023) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adg0279 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence accumulation during a sensorimotor decision task revealed by whole-brain imaging
Dragomir, E. I., Štih, V., & Portugues, R. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0535-8 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
NeuroMechFly, a neuromechanical model of adult Drosophila melanogaster
Lobato-Rios, V., Ramalingasetty, S. T., Özdil, P. G., Arreguit, J., Ijspeert, A. J., & Ramdya, P. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01466-7 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationRheotaxis revisited: a multi-behavioral and multisensory perspective on how fish orient to flow
Coombs, S., Bak-Coleman, J., & Montgomery, J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.223008 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Pretectal neurons control hunting behaviour
Antinucci, P., Folgueira, M., & Bianco, I. H. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48114 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The optics of the spherical fish lens
Jagger, W. S. (1992) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90222-5 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Zhou, M., Bear, J., Roberts, P., Janiak, F. K., Semmelhack, J. L., Yoshimatsu, T., & Baden, T. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.055 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Comparison of optomotor and optokinetic reflexes in mice
Kretschmer, F., Tariq, M., Chatila, W. K., Wu, B. P., & Badea, T. C. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00055.2017 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Ijspeert, A. J., & Daley, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.245784 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuronal Architecture of a Visual Center that Processes Optic Flow
Kramer, A., Wu, Y., Baier, H., & Kubo, F. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.018 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Floreano, D., Ijspeert, A. J., & Stefan Schaal, A. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.058 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationWiggin, T. D., Anderson, T. M., Eian, J., Peck, J. H., & Masino, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00233.2012 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Collery, R. F., Veth, K. N., Dubis, A. M., Carroll, J., & Link, B. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110699 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Underwater Target Tracking Control of an Untethered Robotic Fish With a Camera Stabilizer
Yu, J., Wu, Z., Yang, X., Yang, Y., & Zhang, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2019.2963246 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A primal role for the vestibular sense in the development of coordinated locomotion
Ehrlich, D., & Schoppik, D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.45839 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Pichler, P., & Lagnado, L. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.020 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Evolution of neural processing for visual perception in vertebrates
Knudsen, E. I. (2020) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24871 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
A virtual rodent predicts the structure of neural activity across behaviours
Aldarondo, D., Merel, J., Marshall, J. D., Hasenclever, L., Klibaite, U., Gellis, A., Tassa, Y., Wayne, G., Botvinick, M., & Ölveczky, B. P. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07633-4 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
A cerebellar internal model calibrates a feedback controller involved in sensorimotor control
Markov, D., Petrucco, L., Kist, A., & Portugues, R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26988-0 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Parallel Channels for Motion Feature Extraction in the Pretectum and Tectum of Larval Zebrafish
Wang, K., Hinz, J., Zhang, Y., Thiele, T. R., & Arrenberg, A. B. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.031 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A spinal organ of proprioception for integrated motor action feedback
Picton, L. D., Bertuzzi, M., Pallucchi, I., Fontanel, P., Dahlberg, E., Björnfors, E. R., Iacoviello, F., Shearing, P. R., & El Manira, A. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.018 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kist, A. M., & Portugues, R. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.024 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A bioinspired autonomous swimming robot as a tool for studying goal-directed locomotion
Manfredi, L., Assaf, T., Mintchev, S., et al. (2013) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-013-0566-2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila
Wang-Chen, S., Stimpfling, V. A., Lam, T. K. C., Özdil, P. G., Genoud, L., Hurtak, F., & Ramdya, P. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02497-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Whole-brain interactions underlying zebrafish behavior
Loring, M. D., Thomson, E. E., & Naumann, E. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2020.09.011 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationA Systematic Comparison of Simulation Software for Robotic Arm Manipulation using ROS2
Audonnet, F. P., Hamilton, A., & Aragon-Camarasa, G. (2022) · 2022 22nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) · doi:10.23919/iccas55662.2022.10003832 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Comparing Popular Simulation Environments in the Scope of Robotics and Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Körber, M., Lange, J., Rediske, S., Steinmann, S., & Glück, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.04616 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Newton, K. C., Kacev, D., Nilsson, S. R. O., Saettele, A. L., Golden, S. A., & Sheets, L. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04449-2 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Lamination Speeds the Functional Development of Visual Circuits
Nikolaou, N., & Meyer, M. P. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.020 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Retinal direction selectivity in the absence of asymmetric starburst amacrine cell responses
Hanson, L., Sethuramanujam, S., deRosenroll, G., Jain, V., & Awatramani, G. B. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42392 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A Neural Representation of Naturalistic Motion-Guided Behavior in the Zebrafish Brain
Yildizoglu, T., Riegler, C., Fitzgerald, J. E., & Portugues, R. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.043 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Alexander, E., Cai, L. T., Fuchs, S., Hladnik, T. C., Zhang, Y., Subramanian, V., Guilbeault, N. C., Vijayakumar, C., Arunachalam, M., Juntti, S. A., et al. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Masseck, O. A., & Hoffmann, K. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00415.2009 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Finding the gap: neuromorphic motion-vision in dense environments
Schoepe, T., Janotte, E., Milde, M. B., Bertrand, O. J. N., Egelhaaf, M., & Chicca, E. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45063-y · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Trump, W. J. V., & McHenry, M. J. (2013) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/ict064 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A robust receptive field code for optic flow detection and decomposition during self-motion
Zhang, Y., Huang, R., Nörenberg, W., & Arrenberg, A. B. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.048 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Functional and ultrastructural analysis of reafferent mechanosensation in larval zebrafish
Odstrcil, I., Petkova, M. D., Haesemeyer, M., Boulanger-Weill, J., Nikitchenko, M., Gagnon, J. A., Oteíza, P., Schalek, R. L., Peleg, A., Portugues, R., et al. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.007 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A viral toolbox for conditional and transneuronal gene expression in zebrafish
Satou, C., Neve, R. L., Oyibo, H. K., Zmarz, P., Huang, K., Bouldoires, E. A., Mori, T., Higashijima, S., Keller, G. B., & Friedrich, R. W. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77153 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A computational model of visually guided locomotion in lamprey
Sarvestani, I. K., Kozlov, A., Harischandra, N., Grillner, S. E., & Ekeberg, Ö. (2012) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-012-0524-4 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based
VanRullen, R. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.030 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Bilateral visual projections exist in non-teleost bony fish and predate the emergence of tetrapods
Vigouroux, R. J., Duroure, K., Vougny, J., Albadri, S., Kozulin, P., Herrera, E., Nguyen-Ba-Charvet, K. T., Braasch, I., Suárez, R., Bene, F. D., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe7790 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Asymmetric retinal direction tuning predicts optokinetic eye movements across stimulus conditions
Harris, S. C., & Dunn, F. A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81780 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mangan, M., Floreano, D., Yasui, K., Trimmer, B. A., Gravish, N., Hauert, S., Webb, B. H., Manoonpong, P., & Szczecinski, N. S. (2023) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/acc223 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Transsynaptic labeling and transcriptional control of zebrafish neural circuits
Coomer, C. E., Naumova, D., Talay, M., Zolyomi, B., Snell, N. J., Sorkaç, A., Chanchu, J. M., Cheng, J., Roman, I., Li, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01815-z · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fouke, K. E., He, Z., Loring, M. D., & Naumann, E. A. (2024) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.04.027 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationModelling 3D saccade generation by feedforward optimal control
John, A., Aleluia, C., Opstal, A. J. V., et al. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008975 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationYoussef, I., Mutlu, M., Bayat, B., Crespi, A., Hauser, S., Conradt, J., Bernardino, A. J. M., & Ijspeert, A. J. (2020) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2020.2972839 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationDunn, T. W., & Fitzgerald, J. E. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53684 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Li, C., Kreiman, G., & Ramanathan, S. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00854-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Quantitative Reassessment of Speed Tuning in the Accessory Optic System and Pretectum of Pigeons
Winship, I. R., Crowder, N. A., & WYLIE, D. R. W. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00921.2005 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Quantification of the influence of drugs on zebrafish larvae swimming kinematics and energetics
Zhao, Z., Li, G., Xiao, Q., Jiang, H.-R., Tchivelekete, G. M., Shu, X., & Liu, H. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.8374 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Transience of the Retinal Output Is Determined by a Great Variety of Circuit Elements
Ganczer, A., Szarka, G., Balogh, M., Hoffmann, G., Tengölics, Á. J., Kenyon, G. T., Kovács‐Öller, T., & Völgyi, B. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11050810 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
An Un-Momentous Start to Life: Can Hydrodynamics Explain Why Fish Larvae Change Swimming Style?
MÜLLER, U. K., LEEUWEN, J. L. V., DUIN, S. V., & LIU, H. (2009) · Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering · doi:10.1299/jbse.4.37 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Balance Sense: Response Motifs that Pervade the Brain
Ehrlich, D., & Schoppik, D. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.032 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07633-4 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Merel D. Aldarondo J. Marshall Y. Tassa G. Wayne B. Olveczky “Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodent” in ICLR 2020: The Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2019) pp. 1–20; https://openreview.net/forum?id=SyxrxR4KPS.
- D. E. Rumelhart R. Durbin R. Golden Y. Chauvin “Backpropagation: The basic theory” in Backpropagation: Theory Architectures and Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 1995) pp. 1–34.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, J., Ye, Q., Hu, Z., Wang, X., & Zhou, X. (2026) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2026.117889 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Energy efficiency and neural control of continuous versus intermittent swimming in a fishlike robot
Liu, X., Longchamp, F. A., Zunino, L., Gevers, L., Schneider, L. R., Bothner, S. I., Guignard, A., Crespi, A., Bellegarda, G., Bernardino, A. J. M., et al. (2026) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adw7868 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationIjspeert, A. J., Francesco Mondada, C., Standen, E. M., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72478-6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-organized Recovery of Coordinated Locomotion in Crickets via Prosthetic Limb IntegrationPreprint
Owaki, D., & Aonuma, H. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.15.699627
The embodied brain: Bridging the brain, body, and behavior with biorealistic neuromechanical models
Wang, S., & Ramdya, P. P. (2026) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2026.103244
Zebrafish as a translational model for peptide-mediated synaptic dysfunction related to obesity
Rodrigues, A. C., Lacerda, A. P., Mukoyama, L. T. H., de Carvalho, G. B., da Mata, J. A. L., Buccini, D. F., Franco, O. L., & Migliolo, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1845252
Building digital twin brains at the limits of measurement
Zhang, R., Hou, Y., Lu, W., & Feng, J. (2026) · Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44287-026-00320-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…the ready availability of calcium imaging, has shifted focus to circuit-level emulations constrained by functional recordings: the simZFish model 76 simulates the zebrafish optomotor response and replicates real larval behaviour in an embodied model, with parameters calibrated from behavioural…”
Neuromechanical models deepen our understanding of animal motor control
Ijspeert, A. J. (2026) · The Transmitter · doi:10.53053/acrl8123
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, X., Loring, M. D., Zunino, L., Fouke, K. E., Longchamp, F. A., Bernardino, A., Ijspeert, A. J., & Naumann, E. A.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Duke University (US)
- Instituto Superior Técnico (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Naumann, Eva A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Robotics
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 107
- Pages
- eadv4408-eadv4408
- ISSN
- 2470-9476 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13077711
- OpenAlex
- W4415221481
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Science Robotics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY033845)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R34NS116738, RF1NS128895, R01NS128895)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Keywords
- sensorimotor circuits, embodiment, zebrafish larvae, rheotaxis, optical flow, retinal connectivity, receptive fields, fluid dynamics, neural circuit architecture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain, Computer Simulation, Larva, Nerve Net, Robotics, Swimming, Zebrafish, Neural Networks, Computer, Rivers, Hydrodynamics, Optic Flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review