The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Psychological and Biological Models
Abstract
What makes people smarter than computers? These volumes by a pioneering neurocomputing group suggest that the answer lies in the massively parallel architecture of the human mind. They describe a new theory of cognition called connectionism that is challenging the idea of symbolic computation that has traditionally been at the center of debate in theoretical discussions about the mind. The authors' theory assumes the mind is composed of a great number of elementary units connected in a neural network. Mental processes are interactions between these units which excite and inhibit each other in parallel rather than sequential operations. In this context, knowledge can no longer be thought of as stored in localized structures; instead, it consists of the connections between pairs of units that are distributed throughout the network. Volume 1 lays the foundations of this exciting theory of parallel distributed processing, while Volume 2 applies it to a number of specific issues in cognitive science and neuroscience, with chapters describing models of aspects of perception, memory, language, and thought.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognitive science has developed computational models that decompose cognition into functional components.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Networks for approximation and learning
Poggio, T., & Girosi, F. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58326 · Cited by 3,256
30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation
Widrow, B. C., & Lehr, M. A. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58323 · Cited by 2,270
Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks
Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2621 · Cited by 2,063
Metadata
- Authors
- McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & AU
- ORCID
- McClelland, James L.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1987
- OpenAlex
- W4253020087
- Cited by
- 3,315
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 42.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
- Keywords
- parallel distributed processing, connectionism, artificial neural networks, cognitive architecture, symbolic computation, distributed knowledge, perception, memory, language, thinking, neuroscience, cognitive science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review