The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Nonparametric Approach to Bottom-Up Visual Saliency
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the bottom-up influence of local image information on hu-man eye movements. Most existing computational models use a set of biolog-ically plausible linear filters, e.g., Gabor or Difference-of-Gaussians filters as a front-end, the outputs of which are nonlinearly combined into a real number that indicates visual saliency. Unfortunately, this requires many design parameters such as the number, type, and size of the front-end filters, as well as the choice of nonlinearities, weighting and normalization schemes etc., for which biological plausibility cannot always be justified. As a result, these parameters have to be chosen in a more or less ad hoc way. Here, we propose to learn a visual saliency model directly from human eye movement data. The model is rather simplistic and essentially parameter-free, and therefore contrasts recent developments in the field that usually aim at higher prediction rates at the cost of additional parameters and increasing model complexity. Experimental results show that—despite the lack of any biological prior knowledge—our model performs comparably to existing ap-proaches, and in fact learns image features that resemble findings from several pre-vious studies. In particular, its maximally excitatory stimuli have center-surround structure, similar to receptive fields in the early human visual system. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DISCHARGE PATTERNS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MAMMALIAN RETINA
Kuffler, S. W. (1953) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37 · Cited by 2,609
Cited by
Learning to predict where humans look
Judd, T., Ehinger, K., Durand, F., & Torralba, A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459462 · Cited by 2,016
SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics
Zhang, L., Tong, M. H., Marks, T. K., Shan, H., & Cottrell, G. W. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.7.32 · Cited by 1,227
Saliency in VR: How Do People Explore Virtual Environments?
Sitzmann, V., Serrano, A., Pavel, A., Agrawala, M., Gutierrez, D., Masia, B., & Wetzstein, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2793599 · Cited by 459
Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images
Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Cox, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.358 · Cited by 428
Saliency estimation using a non-parametric low-level vision model
Murray, N., Vanrell, M., Otazu, X., & Parraga, C. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995506 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Kienzle, W., Wichmann, F. A., Schölkopf, B., & Franz, M. O.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-09-07
- Pages
- 689-696
- OpenAlex
- W2138015733
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Nonparametric Approach to Bottom-Up Visual Saliency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0091
- The paper
- Kienzle, W., Wichmann, F. A., Schölkopf, B., & Franz, M. O. (2007). A Nonparametric Approach to Bottom-Up Visual Saliency. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.