Cited by 63Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

An experimentally validated network of nine haematopoietic transcription factors reveals mechanisms of cell state stability

Open access
Schütte, Judith, Wang, Huange, Antoniou, Stella, Jarratt, Andrew, Wilson, Nicola K, Riepsaame, Joey, Calero-Nieto, Fernando J, Moignard, Victoria +9 more·2016·eLife

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF) networks determine cell-type identity by establishing and maintaining lineage-specific expression profiles, yet reconstruction of mammalian regulatory network models has been hampered by a lack of comprehensive functional validation of regulatory interactions. Here, we report comprehensive ChIP-Seq, transgenic and reporter gene experimental data that have allowed us to construct an experimentally validated regulatory network model for haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Model simulation coupled with subsequent experimental validation using single cell expression profiling revealed potential mechanisms for cell state stabilisation, and also how a leukaemogenic TF fusion protein perturbs key HSPC regulators. The approach presented here should help to improve our understanding of both normal physiological and disease processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.11469

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combinatorial occupancy of chromatin by multiple master transcription factors has revealed regulatory networks important for hematopoiesis.

    “For instance, the combinatorial occupancy of chromatin by multiple master TFs has revealed regulatory networks that are important for hematopoiesis (Beck et al., 2013; Schütte et al., 2016), as well as key regulatory elements necessary for HSC self-renewal (Bahr et al., 2018).”

    From Unraveling Hematopoiesis through the Lens of Genomics (2020) · cites this paper as Schütte et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schütte, J., Wang, H., Antoniou, S., Jarratt, A., Wilson, N. K., Riepsaame, J., Calero-Nieto, F. J., Moignard, V., Basilico, S., Kinston, S. J., Hannah, R. L., Chan, M. C., Nürnberg, S. T., Ouwehand, W. H., Bonzanni, N., de Bruijn, M. F., & Göttgens, B.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • NHS Blood and Transplant (GB)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
  • Bonzanni, Nicola
  • Göttgens, Berthold
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-02-22
Volume
5
Pages
e11469-e11469
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2287204676
Cited by
63
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (100140, G097922, G0900729/1)
  • Cancer Research UK (C1163/A12765)
  • Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research (12029)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I00050X/1)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Medical Research Council (G0900951)
  • MRC Molecular Haematology Unit (Oxford) core award
  • Weizmann-UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, transcriptional regulatory networks, regulatory network reconstruction, lineage identity, ChIP-seq, single-cell expression profiling, hematopoiesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Computer Simulation, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Models, Theoretical, Transcription Factors, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review