Cited by 82Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Regulatory network control of blood stem cells

Göttgens, Berthold·2015·Blood

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are characterized by their ability to execute a wide range of cell fate choices, including self-renewal, quiescence, and differentiation into the many different mature blood lineages. Cell fate decision making in HSCs, as indeed in other cell types, is driven by the interplay of external stimuli and intracellular regulatory programs. Given the pivotal nature of HSC decision making for both normal and aberrant hematopoiesis, substantial research efforts have been invested over the last few decades into deciphering some of the underlying mechanisms. Central to the intracellular decision making processes are transcription factor proteins and their interactions within gene regulatory networks. More than 50 transcription factors have been shown to affect the functionality of HSCs. However, much remains to be learned about the way in which individual factors are connected within wider regulatory networks, and how the topology of HSC regulatory networks might affect HSC function. Nevertheless, important progress has been made in recent years, and new emerging technologies suggest that the pace of progress is likely to accelerate. This review will introduce key concepts, provide an integrated view of selected recent studies, and conclude with an outlook on possible future directions for this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2014-08-570226

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recently, genomic approaches have helped to unravel the mechanisms by which these factors alter hematopoietic cell differentiation.

    “More recently, genomic approaches have helped to unravel the mechanisms by which these factors alter hematopoietic cell differentiation (Göttgens, 2015).”

    From Unraveling Hematopoiesis through the Lens of Genomics (2020) · cites this paper as Göttgens, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Göttgens, B.
Affiliations
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Göttgens, Berthold
Venue
Blood
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
125
Issue
17
Pages
2614-2620
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2015059346
Cited by
82
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (97922)
  • Cancer Research UK (12765)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I00050X/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
hematopoietic stem cells, gene regulatory networks, transcription factors, cell fate decision-making, self-renewal, quiescence, hematopoiesis, network topology, stem cell differentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Models, Molecular, Transcription Factors, Gene Regulatory Networks, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review