Cited by 157Forensic and Genetic ResearchEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic diversity and population structure

Background selection and biased gene conversion affect more than 95% of the human genome and bias demographic inferences

Open access
Pouyet, Fanny, Aeschbacher, Simon, Thiéry, Alexandre, Excoffier, Laurent·2018·eLife

Abstract

Disentangling the effect on genomic diversity of natural selection from that of demography is notoriously difficult, but necessary to properly reconstruct the history of species. Here, we use high-quality human genomic data to show that purifying selection at linked sites (i.e. background selection, BGS) and GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) together affect as much as 95% of the variants of our genome. We find that the magnitude and relative importance of BGS and gBGC are largely determined by variation in recombination rate and base composition. Importantly, synonymous sites and non-transcribed regions are also affected, albeit to different degrees. Their use for demographic inference can lead to strong biases. However, by conditioning on genomic regions with recombination rates above 1.5 cM/Mb and mutation types (C↔G, A↔T), we identify a set of SNPs that is mostly unaffected by BGS or gBGC, and that avoids these biases in the reconstruction of human history.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.36317

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study used a subset of data restricted to genomic regions with high recombination rates (>1.5 cM/Mb) and removed regions closer than 100 base pairs from conserved elements, following Pouyet et al.

    “The second considered the same Full Eurasia model, but using a subset of data restricted to genomic regions with high recombination rates (>1.5 cM/Mb), also removing regions closer than 100 base pairs from conserved elements, following (63).”

    From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results identify >1.5 cM/Mb as the threshold used to define a set of SNPs suitable for demographic inference. The Discussion considers proximity to conserved elements but says that nearby sites remained in that set; it does not describe excluding sites within 100 base pairs. Thus the recombination criterion follows Pouyet et al., but the additional exclusion does not. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The high-recombination subset is presumably less affected by background selection but still affected by GC-biased gene conversion.

    “This dataset is much more limited in size (n = 1190) and genomic positions (~80% less), but presumably less affected by background selection, while still affected by GC-biased gene conversion (63).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pouyet, F., Aeschbacher, S., Thiéry, A., & Excoffier, L.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Pouyet, Fanny
  • Excoffier, Laurent
Venue
eLife
Published
2018-08-23
Volume
7
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888373299
Cited by
153
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030B-166605)
  • University of California Berkeley (Visiting Miller Professorship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
background selection, GC-biased gene conversion, purifying selection, human genome, recombination rate, nucleotide composition, synonymous sites, demographic inference, human population history, mutation types, single nucleotide polymorphisms
MeSH terms
Base Composition, Demography, Gene Conversion, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review