Cited by 138Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expandable and reversible copy number amplification drives rapid adaptation to antifungal drugs

Open access

Abstract

Previously, we identified long repeat sequences that are frequently associated with genome rearrangements, including copy number variation (CNV), in many diverse isolates of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans (Todd et al., 2019). Here, we describe the rapid acquisition of novel, high copy number CNVs during adaptation to azole antifungal drugs. Single-cell karyotype analysis indicates that these CNVs appear to arise via a dicentric chromosome intermediate and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles that are repaired using multiple distinct long inverted repeat sequences. Subsequent removal of the antifungal drug can lead to a dramatic loss of the CNV and reversion to the progenitor genotype and drug susceptibility phenotype. These findings support a novel mechanism for the rapid acquisition of antifungal drug resistance and provide genomic evidence for the heterogeneity frequently observed in clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.58349

Cites

186 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 184 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Metadata

Authors
Todd, R. T., & Selmecki, A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Selmecki, Anna
Venue
eLife
Published
2020-07-20
Volume
9
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042508348
Cited by
138
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI143689)
  • Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (LB506-2017-55)
  • Nebraska Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (First Award)
  • National Center for Research Resources (COBRE P20RR018788 sub-award)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
Candida albicans, copy number variation, antifungal resistance, azole antifungals, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, inverted repeats, drug sensitivity, genome rearrangement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Genotype, Drug Resistance, Fungal, DNA Copy Number Variations, Single-Cell Analysis, Karyotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review